On 10/25/2013 06:32 PM, Christian Mondrup wrote:
Jean-Pierre Coulon wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Rutger Hofman wrote:
I have completed the corrections for all 3 movements; Biebricher made
quite some errors in mvt 1, fewer in 2, still fewer in 3. Is there any
interest in the errata list? Should I mention that I corrected only
clear errors?
I think this is a question about imslp habits. I have never seen such
erratas or comments on imslp. In doubt ask in
http://imslpforums.org/viewforum.php?f=2
Many of own WIMA/IMSLP editions include critical notes where I specify
the changes I made in relation to my source(s). I suggest that you
prepare such notes for your revised edition of Biebricher's arrangement.
In the critical notes you could refer to Biebricher's editions as well
as to J.S.Bach sources to the music. You should also specify the change
of engraving software.
Including the errata in the scores seems far too heavyweight to me; this
is simply about typing errors, nothing musicologically remotely
interesting. I will include a text file with errata in the source zip,
though, and re-upload that.
[snip]
Rutger
-------------------------------
[email protected] mailing list
If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
