Jean-Pierre Coulon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, Robin Fairbairns wrote: > > > the tug office is rather sparsely staffed, aiui. perhaps you should > > propose an increase in subs to pay for more staffing hours? > > But then why does the tug office "mow the lawn of the house next door" > in the sense that tex-music already has its own archiving system at > mail-archive.com?
the tug office doesn't do that (it's there to answer non-texnical queries and to manage subscriptions and publishing). whoever responded to the original request for the list presumably. > At least mail-archive.com does the munging job correctly! for this month, i.e., until whichever address harvester decodes it. as i said, if you want better things than the volunteers provide, you may need to volunteer to help. remember, tug (outside of the office) is a name, not a collection of staff. pretty much _everything_ else is done on a voluntary basis. this is the last post i shall respond to, suggesting that "tug should" do things about computing services -- it's clear that no-one wants to read my posts. if you want to complain, complain to the relevant list managers. ------------------------------- [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
