Have I missed something all these years? The attached PMX file (also given below) compiles perfectly and gives the first pdf attachment.
If I take out the A labels on the slurs, it gives the second pdf
attachment. As you can see, the sequence
(+4 f2d { e4 | e } )+3
which is supposed to be equivalent to
f2d s+4 e4 t | e t s+3
(if I code that explicitly, it works) behaves as if it is equivalent to
f2d s+4 e4 s | e s s+3
I haven't coded straight PMX without the aid of M-Tx for almost
20 years, so I don't know whether this has always been like that
or whether it crept in with a recent release.
~~~{.pmx}
1 1 4 4 0 0 3 2 0 5 20 0
t
./
% \\input pmxlyr\
% Bars 1-3
% \pmxlyr{all der ir--ren Qua--len los.}\
r4-6 r2-6 | r4-8 d2s e4 | ( c d2r )+0+1 d4 //
% \pmxlyr{all der ir--ren Qua-len los.}\
c25n a4 | (A+4 f2d {u e4 | e } )A+3 dn { d2 /
% Bars 4-5
d2 a | a r+0 //
d } c | d of rb /
~~~
waldesnacht.pmx
Description: Binary data
waldesnacht.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
waldesnacht-nolabel.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
------------------------------- [email protected] mailing list If you want to unsubscribe or look at the archives, go to http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/tex-music
