Dear all, Just a follow-up about the bug reports/feature requests I sent out a week ago. I realize I asked for a lot all at once, so I thought I would single out a couple that are highest priority:
1. *Superscript (and subscripts) not working in footnotes* ( https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/474005/superscript-not-working-in-footnotes-in-tex4ht-output). This is the main one because it can't be fixed by find/replace. I use superscript to refer to the "recto" and "verso" of folios in medieval manuscripts (e.g., `folio 2\textsuperscript{r}` for the recto side of folio 2), and I use subscript for line numbers when referring to manuscripts or critical editions (e.g., `22\textsubscript{1-24}` for lines 1-24 of page 22). Especially in the latter case, information is actually lost in the conversion, since "221-24" means something quite different from "22, lines 1-24". 2. Less important because it's about formatting rather than information, but still problematic because it can't be fixed with find/replace, is the problem of *spuriously italicized (or boldface) footnote hooks* ( https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/474003/spuriously-italicized-footnote-hooks-in- tex4ht-output). The rest are less important. The section break issue can be fixed with find/replace in MS Word (find ^b = Section break, replace it with nothing). The section numbering issue is not an issue at all (I was confused). As for formatting footnotes, that is certainly not urgent! I hope this helps. I would also like to express my gratitude to all who work on and maintain tex4ht, which is a life-saver for those of us working with publishers who are still in the Word world! Best wishes, Alex On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:34 PM Alexandre Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > PS - I've added the MWEs (and in the process realized that one of my > questions was my own mistake and had nothing to do with tex4ht at all, the > one about section numbering). > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 3:16 PM Alexandre Roberts < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Michal, >> >> Absolutely! I'll add them today. >> >> Best, >> Alex >> >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 1:40 PM Michal Hoftich <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Dear Alex, >>> >>> could you please add MWEs to questions where it is missing? It will >>> make it easier for us to replicate the issues. I hope to take a look >>> at all of this in next few days. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Michal >>> >>
