Dear Alex, I've been busy in the last week, so I was not able to take a look at these issues yet. I hope that things will settle down soon, I will start to process the issue queue then. No need to worry about the number of issues.
Best regards, Michal > Just a follow-up about the bug reports/feature requests I sent out a week > ago. I realize I asked for a lot all at once, so I thought I would single out > a couple that are highest priority: > > 1. Superscript (and subscripts) not working in footnotes > (https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/474005/superscript-not-working-in-footnotes-in-tex4ht-output). > This is the main one because it can't be fixed by find/replace. I use > superscript to refer to the "recto" and "verso" of folios in medieval > manuscripts (e.g., `folio 2\textsuperscript{r}` for the recto side of folio > 2), and I use subscript for line numbers when referring to manuscripts or > critical editions (e.g., `22\textsubscript{1-24}` for lines 1-24 of page 22). > Especially in the latter case, information is actually lost in the > conversion, since "221-24" means something quite different from "22, lines > 1-24". > > 2. Less important because it's about formatting rather than information, but > still problematic because it can't be fixed with find/replace, is the problem > of spuriously italicized (or boldface) footnote hooks > (https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/474003/spuriously-italicized-footnote-hooks-in-tex4ht-output). > > The rest are less important. The section break issue can be fixed with > find/replace in MS Word (find ^b = Section break, replace it with nothing). > The section numbering issue is not an issue at all (I was confused). As for > formatting footnotes, that is certainly not urgent! > > I hope this helps. I would also like to express my gratitude to all who work > on and maintain tex4ht, which is a life-saver for those of us working with > publishers who are still in the Word world! > > Best wishes, > Alex
