Dear Etan,

I’ve just realized that the very same problem exists also with the cmcbxti.htf. 
All in all, the following files used to have this problem:

/usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/unicode/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbx.htf
/usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/unicode/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbxti.htf
/usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/win/1251/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbx.htf
/usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/win/1251/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbxti.htf
/usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/5/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbx.htf
/usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/5/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbxti.htf

Now, only the first one of these seems to have the problem fixed in the latest 
release, while others still have it.

Best regards,
— A.

> On 18 Feb 2021, at 05:45, Arkady Benediktov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Eitan,
> 
> Thanks for the great tool!
> 
> Just a small suspected typo report: it appears that in the cmcbx.htf the 
> Unicode fo the glyph \x19 should be U+2116 (Numero sign), not U+2216 (Set 
> minus). I am attaching the output of pdftex testfont for your convenience.
> 
> Best regards,
> – A.
> 
> <testfont.pdf>

Reply via email to