Dear Etan, I’ve just realized that the very same problem exists also with the cmcbxti.htf. All in all, the following files used to have this problem:
/usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/unicode/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbx.htf /usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/unicode/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbxti.htf /usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/win/1251/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbx.htf /usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/win/1251/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbxti.htf /usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/5/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbx.htf /usr/local/texlive/2022basic/texmf-dist/tex4ht/ht-fonts/iso8859/5/cyrillic/cmcyr/cmcbxti.htf Now, only the first one of these seems to have the problem fixed in the latest release, while others still have it. Best regards, — A. > On 18 Feb 2021, at 05:45, Arkady Benediktov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Eitan, > > Thanks for the great tool! > > Just a small suspected typo report: it appears that in the cmcbx.htf the > Unicode fo the glyph \x19 should be U+2116 (Numero sign), not U+2216 (Set > minus). I am attaching the output of pdftex testfont for your convenience. > > Best regards, > – A. > > <testfont.pdf>
