What's the point of insuring the camera under one's homeowner's
policy? So I can get insurance to pay for the repairs next time it
falls out of the car and breaks?

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Pete Lindsley <caverp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like it is now a caving camera (if it still works). Then either buy a
> better cave camera (like one of the new waterproof Pentax cameras, my 4-year
> old Pentax is a W-60), or upgrade your Canon to a newer one for probably
> cheaper than the repair, or both, and then insure the cameras under an
> itemized list attached to your home owners policy.
>
>  - Pete
>
> On Aug 10, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Geary Schindel wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I have (had) a Canon EOS Rebel XT digital (8 mg) camera.  The camera bag
> rolled out of the car and fell on its head at convention and now the LCD
> screen doesn’t function (the one with all the camera data, not the screen
> which shows the picture).  Lens works fine. So, is this thing worth
> repairing considering there is probably a repair cost to tell me how much
> more it will cost to repair or should I buy a new camera.  If so, I was
> thinking of just buying the same or similar body.  Seems they have upgraded
> it some and they now use SD cards which would be nice.  Any thoughts on what
> I should do.  It has been a pretty good camera up until now.  I certainly
> don’t need any of the high end professional cameras but still like a SLR.
>
> Geary
>
>
>
>



-- 
Lyndon Tiu

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: texascavers-unsubscr...@texascavers.com
For additional commands, e-mail: texascavers-h...@texascavers.com

Reply via email to