Ken, admittedly I have just quickly scanned the documents on the BLM site. Did I miss something that discussed not working with the FSCSP?
The title of this post is somewhat misleading as I feel it should have read "BLM proposes plan for managing FSC - SRP NCA". The actual management of the cave itself is just one part of the plan. It looks like it addresses all activities related to the NCA. The stuff I read about the management of the cave itself seems to me to be the same stuff that is already in place and has been for years. This process takes it out of its "temporary" form (EA for exploration) and gets it into a more permanent form (RMPA). But none the less I would greatly encourage members to submit comments!! It is vitally important. With this sort of decision (RMPA) complaining about it after the fact won't get you too far. Also, make sure you pay close attention to things listed that don't fall under the cave management sections. There very well could be items in those sections that could be important to comment on (campground issues, etc). Once again, I have just briefly scanned what is on the blm site in my half away daze..... Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry® -----Original Message----- From: Ken Harrington <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] List-Post: [email protected] Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:07:45 To: <[email protected]>; Lee Skinner<[email protected]>; SWR Cavers<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [SWR] BLM issues proposal for managing Fort Stanton cave system _______________________________________________ SWR mailing list [email protected] http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/swr_caver.net _______________________________________________ SWR mailing list [email protected] http://caver.net/mailman/listinfo/swr_caver.net
