I get fingerprinted every time I go across the border and need to go beyond
20 miles inland into the states.
No big deal
Nico

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Cynthia Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

> I was finger printed in 1975 when I went to work for UPS as a temp.
>
> Cindy
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Linda Palit <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  Traditionally being fingerprinted was associated with being a criminal.
>>
>>
>> This view is sure to change as it becomes so common.
>>
>>
>>
>> Probably this is becoming way off topic, and I am not meeting the word
>> limits, so enough of this for me.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Louise Power [mailto:[email protected]]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 01, 2009 12:23 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]; Texas Cavers
>> *Subject:* RE: [Texascavers] Big-Brother related
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm a federal employee. My prints have been on file for years. I do not
>> find it humiliating or feel that my privacy has been invaded. Why were you
>> so humiliated? Our country has suffered some terrible blows in recent years
>> from people disguised as friends. I'm not sure where you're from, but how
>> does your country verify the identification of foreign nationals?
>>
>> Louise
>>
>> > Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:49:50 -0700
>> > From: [email protected]
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Big-Brother related
>> >
>> > Hm,
>> >
>> > Can we (the foreigners who for whatever reason come to visit USA)
>> encrypt our fingerprints? I have never been to any as humiliating process as
>> this one: being taken my fingerprints at the US border.
>> >
>> > I guess it is really not the best way to make friends. I know many of my
>> friends in Europe who would not come to USA precisely for this reason.
>> >
>> > For whatever reasons, very recently, Texas Teachers were ordered to give
>> their fingerprints as well. I expected riots and protests - but they went
>> silently to gave up all their privacy as easily as that! What a KGB country
>> of obedient society who shouts loudly on privacy but really forgot what
>> "privacy" really means!
>> >
>> > Really, if I had a kid, I would not like it to be educated by these
>> teachers.
>> >
>> > Katy
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Don Cooper <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > From: Don Cooper <[email protected]>
>> > > Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Big-Brother related
>> > > To: "Mixon Bill" <[email protected]>
>> > > Cc: "Cavers Texas" <[email protected]>
>> > > Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 5:10 AM
>> > > I figure if you re-constitute zeros and ones
>> > > on my computer with enough permutations, you can make up
>> > > just about anything including 9/11 plans and blueprints for
>> > > thermonuke devices.
>> > >
>> > > I am all FOR encryption.   If its MY bizness, then it
>> > > should STAY my business.  As far as probing things I've
>> > > thought about and not done - well that is MINE ALONE.  Stay
>> > > out of my HEAD - FEDS!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > And as far as tracking my relative position between cell
>> > > phone towers - How else can I receive a phone call when
>> > > I'm out and about?  But yeah - thanks for reminding me,
>> > > Bill - I should always remember to always turn it off when
>> > > I'm out there committing crimes!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > -WaV
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM,
>> > > Mixon Bill <[email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Surely the authority of the customs people to inspect
>> > > vessels or vehicles applies only to those that have been
>> > > outside the United States?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Anyway, there was an amusing thing in the news a few months
>> > > ago. Some guy came into the US from Canada and somehow the
>> > > customs people learned that there was kiddy porn on his
>> > > laptop computer and arrested him. However, the files were
>> > > encrypted, and even the feds were unable to break the
>> > > encryption and prove it. Courts ruled that the defendent
>> > > could not be required to give up the key to the code. (I
>> > > suspect this might have been a deliberate test case, with
>> > > the offending image deliberately out where the customs
>> > > inspector would see it.)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Drive them crazy. Get PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) and encrypt
>> > > lots of perfectly innocent stuff on your computer. Don't
>> > > use some wimpy encryption facility that comes with your
>> > > operating system; it is probably not NSA-proof. (Actually,
>> > > of course, unless you deliberately do something to make them
>> > > suspicious--not recommended--, it is extremely unlikely that
>> > > they'll ever check.) It would be really nice if it was
>> > > easy and convenient to encrypt everything, including all
>> > > voice communications. But almost nobody really cares about
>> > > his privacy. Witness all those people who travel around with
>> > > their cell phones turned on, making it possible to track
>> > > them in real time.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --Mixon
>> > >
>> > > ----------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > A fearless man cannot be brave.
>> > >
>> > > ----------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > You may "reply" to the address this message
>> > >
>> > > came from, but for long-term use, save:
>> > >
>> > > Personal: [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > AMCS: [email protected]
>> > > or [email protected]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
>> > >
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to