At the school in which I teach, all students and teachers have a
RFID. Kinda cool, easy to tell when students are skipping out. Once
I was relaxing for a few minutes on the porcelain thrown and got a
knock at the door with a question from a student! Now as soon as I
get in the door I swap the battery out for a very weak one ... drives
'em nuts ; )

> For RFID, you might not need a Faraday cage - you might just microwave
> it for a while. Should disable it. (never tried it though).
>
> I am not sure that microwaving iPhone is a good idea in that sense :)
>
> That's the spirit!
>
> Katy
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Brian Riordan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Brian Riordan <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: RE: [Texascavers] Big-Brother related
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 6:03 PM
> > Foil hat- I hear ya Joe!
> > I'm currently working on building a compliant Faraday Cage
> > to keep out
> > Big Brother (who I'll from here on out I'll refer to as
> > "Big Stepdad")
> > I'm gonna call it the "Faraday Freedom Frock" (working
> > title).
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage
> >
> > If you don't mind eliminating any way for someone to call
> > you, I
> > believe there are cases comercially available to put your
> > phone in to
> > block any signals in or out, but then why carry
> > phone?  Personally,
> > I'm still a big fan of the pager.  There are also
> > sleaves available
> > for blocking RFID signals- passive and active (like the
> > ones in the
> > new passports).
> >
> > As for physically taking data storage devices and searching
> > them: what
> > a crock!  If I really want to hide something, I'll
> > have no problem
> > disguising or hiding 2 gigs the size of my thumbnail. 
> > What a waste of
> > government resources (surprise!).
> >
> > As for the teachers:  My wife is one of those teachers
> > who "meekly
> > gave up her right to privacy".  But of course, after 4
> > years of school
> > to teach they spring that rule on you, and there are plenty
> > of people
> > willing to be fingerprinted to get the job- what do you
> > do?  If she
> > kept her "privacy" she'd have to have 3 roomates to pay the
> > bills.
> > OR, give up her privacy so she could have enough money to
> > have her own
> > place (at the time).  It's just like the social
> > security number: "not
> > to be used as identification".  Try to get credit
> > without one!
> >
> > I disagree with it too, but not a lot of options...
> >
> > -B
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:43 AM, <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > The cell phone tracking is something I had read about
> > but never gave a ton
> > > of thought to until I bought the new iphone. On my
> > first generation iphone
> > > the tracking feature could put me in a 10 or 20 block
> > area. A little close
> > > for comfort but not awful. My new iphone without using
> > gps often shows my
> > > precise location to within 10-30 feet. It does this by
> > triangulating my
> > > location from the cell towers but then goes a step
> > further using the wifi
> > > networks nearby to greatly improve the accuracy. Using
> > the built in
> > > accelerometer the phone even knows what direction I am
> > facing...
> > >
> > > I'm not entirely sure this makes me comfortable but
> > then again I continue to
> > > use it. I suppose the moral of the story is that if
> > you need privacy don't
> > > buy any portable electronic device.
> > >
> > > Heck, my cat has her own RFID chip. I used to think
> > that using cash instead
> > > of cards also helps but now I am hearing that the
> > strips in new money can be
> > > picked up by sensors at customs. I've not yet
> > completely substantiated this
> > > one yet...
> > >
> > > Time to get out my foil hat!
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > On Sep 1, 2009 8:59am, Linda Palit <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >> The local grocery is about to require a
> > fingerprint with check and
> > >>
> > >> identification, if you want to use a check.  It
> > has been tested in Austin,
> > >>
> > >> etc, and seems to have worked out.  Babies and
> > children are sometimes
> > >>
> > >> fingerprinted to use as comparison in the case of
> > crimes.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Anonymity is becoming rare and more difficult, and
> > fingerprinting is
> > >>
> > >> associated with things much different than it once
> > was.
> > >>
> > >> I put this in a different category than invading
> > my personal laptop or
> > >>
> > >> tapping my phone, but in a digital age, perhaps it
> > all runs together.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >>
> > >> From: Katy Roodenko [mailto:[email protected]]
> > >>
> > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 8:50 AM
> > >>
> > >> To: Cavers Texas
> > >>
> > >> Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Big-Brother related
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Hm,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Can we (the foreigners who for whatever reason
> > come to visit USA) encrypt
> > >>
> > >> our fingerprints? I have never been to any as
> > humiliating process as this
> > >>
> > >> one: being taken my fingerprints at the US
> > border.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I guess it is really not the best way to make
> > friends. I know many of my
> > >>
> > >> friends in Europe who would not come to USA
> > precisely for this reason.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> For whatever reasons, very recently, Texas
> > Teachers were ordered to give
> > >>
> > >> their fingerprints as well. I expected riots and
> > protests - but they went
> > >>
> > >> silently to gave up all their privacy as easily as
> > that! What a KGB
> > >> country
> > >>
> > >> of obedient society who shouts loudly on privacy
> > but really forgot what
> > >>
> > >> "privacy" really means!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Really, if I had a kid, I would not like it to be
> > educated by these
> > >>
> > >> teachers.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Katy
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --- On Tue, 9/1/09, Don Cooper [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > From: Don Cooper [email protected]>
> > >>
> > >> > Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Big-Brother
> > related
> > >>
> > >> > To: "Mixon Bill" [email protected]>
> > >>
> > >> > Cc: "Cavers Texas" [email protected]>
> > >>
> > >> > Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2009, 5:10 AM
> > >>
> > >> > I figure if you re-constitute zeros and ones
> > >>
> > >> > on my computer with enough permutations, you
> > can make up
> > >>
> > >> > just about anything including 9/11 plans and
> > blueprints for
> > >>
> > >> > thermonuke devices.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > I am all FOR encryption.   If its MY
> > bizness, then it
> > >>
> > >> > should STAY my business.  As far as probing
> > things I've
> > >>
> > >> > thought about and not done - well that is
> > MINE ALONE.  Stay
> > >>
> > >> > out of my HEAD - FEDS!
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > And as far as tracking my relative position
> > between cell
> > >>
> > >> > phone towers - How else can I receive a phone
> > call when
> > >>
> > >> > I'm out and about?  But yeah - thanks for
> > reminding me,
> > >>
> > >> > Bill - I should always remember to always
> > turn it off when
> > >>
> > >> > I'm out there committing crimes!
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > -WaV
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:47 PM,
> > >>
> > >> > Mixon Bill [email protected]>
> > >>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > Surely the authority of the customs people to
> > inspect
> > >>
> > >> > vessels or vehicles applies only to those
> > that have been
> > >>
> > >> > outside the United States?
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > Anyway, there was an amusing thing in the
> > news a few months
> > >>
> > >> > ago. Some guy came into the US from Canada
> > and somehow the
> > >>
> > >> > customs people learned that there was kiddy
> > porn on his
> > >>
> > >> > laptop computer and arrested him. However,
> > the files were
> > >>
> > >> > encrypted, and even the feds were unable to
> > break the
> > >>
> > >> > encryption and prove it. Courts ruled that
> > the defendent
> > >>
> > >> > could not be required to give up the key to
> > the code. (I
> > >>
> > >> > suspect this might have been a deliberate
> > test case, with
> > >>
> > >> > the offending image deliberately out where
> > the customs
> > >>
> > >> > inspector would see it.)
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > Drive them crazy. Get PGP (Pretty Good
> > Privacy) and encrypt
> > >>
> > >> > lots of perfectly innocent stuff on your
> > computer. Don't
> > >>
> > >> > use some wimpy encryption facility that comes
> > with your
> > >>
> > >> > operating system; it is probably not
> > NSA-proof. (Actually,
> > >>
> > >> > of course, unless you deliberately do
> > something to make them
> > >>
> > >> > suspicious--not recommended--, it is
> > extremely unlikely that
> > >>
> > >> > they'll ever check.) It would be really nice
> > if it was
> > >>
> > >> > easy and convenient to encrypt everything,
> > including all
> > >>
> > >> > voice communications. But almost nobody
> > really cares about
> > >>
> > >> > his privacy. Witness all those people who
> > travel around with
> > >>
> > >> > their cell phones turned on, making it
> > possible to track
> > >>
> > >> > them in real time.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > --Mixon
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > ----------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > A fearless man cannot be brave.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > ----------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > You may "reply" to the address this message
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > came from, but for long-term use, save:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > Personal: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > AMCS: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> > or [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >> > [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > >>
> > >> Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> > >>
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > -
> > >>
> > >> Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> > >>
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [email protected] For additional commands,
> > e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [email protected] For additional commands,
> e-mail: [email protected]
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to