I would also say that there are those of us no longer in Texas, not a TSA 
member (but former TSA for many years), who are still interested in what goes 
on there. > Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:36:57 -0600> To: 
[email protected]> From: [email protected]> Subject: 
[Texascavers] TEXAS CAVER Online makes sense> > Charles is exactly right. The 
whole idea of an online TEXAS CAVER is > that it CAN be printed out (in color, 
no less) and hard copy (and > digitally) archived for a whole lot less money 
than the cost of > printing and mailing. I cannot imagine reading an important 
digital > publication on line. I almost always print them out, collate them, > 
and read the hard copy--with my feet up on the desk. Everybody has a > printer 
and damned near everybody has internet. Those that don't can > have a friend do 
it. The CAVER can be bigger, in color, more friendly > to submit to, timely, 
and cheaper to produce and distribute. It is > one of the most important 
positive decisions the TSA has made in a > long time. The technology is here 
and the rewards will be great. The > only thing missing is that The TEXAS CAVER 
is still an elite > subscription newsletter online which will not be readily 
available to > all of the Texas cavers who would benefit from it and the TSA 
(and > all of Texas caving) will suffer the consequences of not having those > 
cavers as readers and contributors. They will miss out on the > important 
information published in The CAVER and and the subscribers > will miss out on 
the information which would normally be contributed > by those barred from 
2-way access to The CAVER. The TSA is not an > association of Texas cavers; it 
is an association of dues payers > beating a dying dog. It can accomplish its 
goals only by reaching out > to and including ALL Texas cavers in its coverage. 
The internet > offers a cheap and simple and effective way to do that. The 
first > step has been taken. It's too bad that money rather than intellect > 
prompted that change. Let's see if common sense can move it make the > next 
step to include all Texas cavers in on the benefits of being a > part of the 
Association by offering them access to both read and > contribute to the 
valuable contents of The TEXAS CAVER.> > I must ask those in the TSA: Why do 
you not want to reach everybody > who is caving in Texas with your safety and 
conservation message and > to promote good and smart caving practices among 
them and induce more > submission to The TEXAS CAVER? Why? The mechanism is in 
place; let's > use it to reach out to those non-participants. Draw them in with 
a > positive influence and counteract any bad caving habits they may > 
have--all at no cost to anyone.> > --Ediger> > At 10:36 PM 1/15/2009, Charles 
Goldsmith wrote:> >Now, to the issue at hand, I disagree, if anyone wants a 
hard copy,> >have it printed, you'll come out a bit more expensive, but that 
way> >the rest of us don't have to pay for the additional cost via higher> 
>subscriptions.> >> >The TSA is moving in the correct direction.> >> >As far as 
making sure these are always available, until time ends,> >proper planning of 
the TSA with this is prudent.> >> >Multiple off-site storage of the files 
should be mandatory, and> >accurate accounting of the off-site files.> >> 
>Requiring everyone to pay more for a hard-copy is selfish and not> >prudent in 
these economical times. I can afford for higher dues, do I> >want them, no. Not 
everyone could afford them, we should probably> >talk about dropping them a bit 
to help everyone out.> >> >If you don't have a printer, you can take the pdf to 
many printing> >shops to have it printed. If you insist on having one mailed to 
you> >in hard copy, perhaps the TSA will consent with doing a special rate> 
>for those, paying a higher dues to cover the printing/mailing cost.> >This 
should not be imposed on everyone though, only to those who elect> >to pay that 
cost.> > > 
---------------------------------------------------------------------> Visit 
our website: http://texascavers.com> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[email protected]> For additional commands, e-mail: 
[email protected]> 

Reply via email to