Louise,
I agree with your statements that big corporations (such as Reliant, TXU, Exxon 
and AT&T are the only ones with the resources to supply the energy needs of our 
nation. Four Johnny come lately small electric providers have folded in the 
last 30 days, probably due to undercapitalization among other things. These 
"big corporations" are basically the life blood of our economy, paying billions 
in taxes, supplying hundreds of thousands of jobs and making it possible for 
all of the lesser companies to exist. Regardless of ones political leanings, a 
windfall profits tax along with the many other taxes and imposed government 
restrictions is unreasonable and detrimental to our economy and to us as 
individuals. Unless you are a welfare recipient and have contributed little or 
nothing to our economy, you should be for downsizing our federal government, 
not growing it. Our citizens already have too great of a tax burden due to our 
wasteful government agencies and their policies. More agencies and more 
programs mean higher taxes and few of us want that. We need big business but 
not big government (which we already have).
Fritz

________________________________
From: Louise Power [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 11:29 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [ot_caving] Texas solar power

rdmilhollin said: "This all smell like a plan of, by, and for the big corporate 
energy providers."

What I'd like to know is who besides "big corporate energy providers" is going 
to provide power and energy to this country? We can't get it from the little 
mill down by the old mill stream. Too many people in this country, too few ways 
to provide big amounts of energy economically. So tell me, who else is going to 
provide energy for this energy-hungry country? Most people don't have the 
expertise, desire or resources to provide energy for themselves, much less a 
whole country. So tell me, what is the alternative? It's easy to criticize, but 
do you have a better plan?


________________________________

From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:48:05 -0500
Subject: RE: [ot_caving] Texas solar power

This all smell like a plan of, by, and for the big corporate energy providers. 
What about using all the empty roof-top space INSIDE the cities, such as the 
roofs of malls, Walmarts, grocery stores, car lots, parking lots, 
strip-centers, individual homes, apartment buildings etc. I can see this as a 
job opportunity for the Barnett Shale "landmen" once all the drillable 
real-estate is leased up. They could go from roof-owner to roof-owner 
negotiating for "roof-rights" to set up solar panels for set amounts of time. 
Shrewd building owners could bargain for a certain amount of "free" 
electricity, since the juice coming off the roof is much more consumer-friendly 
than crude oil or natural gas brought up by wells on people's property.


________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ot_caving] Texas solar power

Well this is some info I found today pasted below.
It comes from 
http://environmenttexas.org/action/clean-energy/transmission?id4=ES

I was interested in the numbers they say would power all of Texas. Just FYI.
Quinta

Texas is the national leader in wind power and we have the potential to meet 
the rest of our energy needs with solar power. In fact, if we put solar panels 
on an area thirty miles by thirty miles in west Texas, we could generate enough 
electricity to power the entire state at prices competitive with new nuclear 
plants!

But to bring all that clean wind and solar power from west Texas, we need to 
invest in our transmission grid. Right now, the Public Utilities Commission is 
deciding how much renewable energy transmission to build.

The most ambitious plan they're looking at would create transmission capacity 
for almost an additional 18,000 megawatts of wind and solar power, which would 
reduce smog pollution from power plants by 13% and global warming pollution by 
16%.


Reply via email to