There's a lot in your proposal that makes sense to me, R.D.  Many  cavers 
wonder what it is that the TSA does for them as a member of the  organization, 
aside from receiving a TxCvr, which  for a long time was  infrequent at best.  
That said, I think we all need to support the TSA as  one of it's principal 
functions is to bring cavers from all parts of the state  together in venues 
such 
as conventions, projects, workshops, etc...  It's  very easy for separate 
grottos to become isolated and out of touch with each  other, sometimes even to 
the point of ugly rivalries.  There are few  opportunities for inter-grotto 
socialism and information sharing outside of  planned statewide affairs that 
either TSA, TSS, TCMA, TCC, or TCR  coordinate.  Of those organizations, the 
TSA 
focuses most of their energies  toward communication functions.  It's true that 
individuals can coordinate  their own projects, but we've seen precious few 
people come forward on a  volunteer basis to offer large scale and continuing 
cave projects that were not  aided, encouraged, or coordinated by the TSA.  
It's a huge effort  and many people soon burn out.  It usually takes a larger 
group to keep the  momentum going.
 
We could use another state cave project right about now.  We just need  
volunteers and caves to make it happen.
 
Jerry.
 
In a message dated 1/16/2008 10:36:51 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

OK, you are  right. I seem to remeber a grant the TSA land fund made to TCMA
when the  down payment for Deep/Punkin was being put together. But the
primary  purpose of the TSA is not to buy caves, ostensibly not even a
secondary one  since they have never bought one. There are two organizations
in the state  dedicated to doing that though, each in their own unique ways.
I would  argue that if cave acquisition is your goal (and a worthy goal in  my
estimation) then get involved and donate to TCMA or TCC.

I think  the TSA meeting was this previous Saturday at CBSP.

My take.

TSA  was traditionally a social gathering mechanism for cavers is a  vast
geographic area. The Texas Caver was an invaluable source for  information.
That was before the internet. I asked at a grotto meeting  tonight that the
president designate a caver, preferably a TSA member, to  act as TSA liaison,
to announce TSA activities to the meeting attendees.  Couldn't find a TSA
member in the room. Why? Too much money; well more like  not getting anything
for the dues. Several people cited the , um,  infrequest publication
schedules of the past. I still feel that twenty  bucks is way out of line for
what you get.

And this is not to take  anything away from Mark, the editor, he does a great
job, and this from a  grotto editor. But in a weird sort of way the TC editor
is in direct  competition with grotto editors for material. The UT Grotto
effectively  uses the Texas Caver as their grotto newsletter. Pretty slick,
getting a  guy from Dallas to edit your Austin cave news. In the era of
instant  communication the TSA seems like something of an achronism, an
unneeded  layer in the caving cake.

My proposal.

Someone in Austin get the  UT grotto newsletter going. Use the Texas Caver as
a DIGEST for the best  articles, maps, trip reports, cave poetry, technical
reports, art work,  photography, etc. and publish quarterly. Go online as was
previously  suggested, and start back the Activities Newsletter, again
online. Lower  online membership to $10 bucks. Raise the dues for hard copy
to $25 or  whatever it takes to cover printing and postage costs plus a
little for the  bank acount, let the folks needing paper for paper. The $10
from online  subscribers is pure gravy, no costs incurred to produce it. More
people  join, membership swells, everyone contributes to their grotto
newletter  hoping the TC editor or editorial board chooses their work for
statewide  publication; cavers all over the state camp out by their mailbox
waiting to  see what wondrous stuff is happening in other parts of the state.
Uh...  well maybe not.

In summary, I fully appreciate that the leaders of the  TSA and members who
have stuck with it have done so for what they genuinely  feel are good
reasons. I think some of the old timers have a sentimental  attachment to the
"way we used to do things" and have not allowed things to  move along into
the future, er... present. I have expressed these ideas to  several TSA
leaders in the past and was scolded in most cases for not being  onboard. A
few (who were not elected) agreed with some or all of what I  expressed. I
basically posited this same scheme tonight, and several grotto  members who
were once TSA members or had never joined stated they would  seriously
consider joining/rejoining. That includes me. You know, joining a  group of
like-minded people seems to be a natural response, unless the  group makes it
to difficult to do so, or can't show a reasonable set of  benefits for doing
so.







**************Start the year off right.  Easy ways to stay in shape.     
http://body.aol.com/fitness/winter-exercise?NCID=aolcmp00300000002489

Reply via email to