Hi Nancy:


Forgive me if this is not quite cave and karst related, but ---------.



A smaller but similar "event" occurred about 25 miles southeast of Carlsbad in 
1961.  This was the Gnome Project and the first test as part of  Project 
Plowshare, a poorly-conceived attempt by Sandia National Labs at demonstrating 
the "peaceful use" of atomic bombs.  The idea was to blow a big hole in the 
middle of the Salado Salt (about 2,000 feet thick there) and use it to store 
petroleum as part of our strategic reserve.



In some ways it worked quite nicely, except for a couple of details.



1. The plug failed and the blast vented to the surface. Official news releases 
stated "Some radiation was released and detected off-site, but it quickly 
decayed". True enough, but the cloud of radioactive particles was blown 
northwest and right over the town of Roswell.  I attribute that event to the 
next generation of natives behaving erratically and embracing the belief that 
aliens from outer space crashed near Roswell.


1. A blast chamber was formed (with a glassy, fused salt floor but with 
breakdown on top of it) and the surrounding salt remained impervious. The 
chamber remained a good container for fluids. The detonation created a cavity 
about 170 ft wide and almost 90 ft high. They actually drilled a shaft (a 
little over 1,000 feet deep) into it after the blast and lowered men down. I 
have talked with one of the guys that was down in there. Six months after the 
detonation, the temperature inside the cavity was still around 140 °F. 
Unfortunately the radioactivity in the blast chamber was so high and long lived 
that any petroleum that would have been stored in it would become too 
radioactive for later use.


Duh!!!!



There was also the idea that perhaps the cavity would be so hot that you could 
pump water into it and then produce "geothermal" energy.  Not a chance!



I got involved in the 1980s-90s because the Gnome blast was very close to the 
WIPP (Waste Isolation Pilot Plant) where I was the geotechnical manager. The 
WIPP is where a peculiar kind of radioactive waste is now being stored. 
Opposition to the storage facility was concerned that water might carry 
contaminated materials away underground from the WIPP.



There is no fluid flow through the salt at those depths because under that much 
confining pressure (the weight of the overlying rocks - roughly 14 atmospheres) 
the salt flows plastically and there is no permeability (connected pore spaces) 
for fluids to flow through.  You must have connected, open pores for fluids to 
move through rocks.  The Gnome site was a location where you could prove that 
the containment of radioactive waste at the WIPP was safe.  If no contaminated 
fluids flow through the undisturbed salt away from Gnome, they could not flow 
away from the next door WIPP site.



But don't befuddle me with science and facts!



DirtDoc



Attached is an image taken inside the blast chamber before the entry shaft was 
permanently sealed.  I think that is a person on top of the rubble pile for 
scale.





xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> On May 30, 2020 at 2:06 PM Nancy Weaver <nan...@prismnet.com> wrote:
> 
>     oops said the geologists.  gotta love the scientific ’try it and see what 
> happens’ attitude
>     
> https://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/do-underground-nuclear-tests-have-fallout?utm_source=Atlas+Obscura+Daily+Newsletter&utm_campaign=52ab7f1d89-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_05_29&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_f36db9c480-52ab7f1d89-71292933&mc_cid=52ab7f1d89&mc_eid=994603381e
>     Nancy
>     _______________________________________________
>     Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
>     Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
>     http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
> 


_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers

Reply via email to