On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:49:22PM +0700, Andrey G. Grozin wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Joris van der Hoeven wrote: > > Someone knows what is the most standard way to convert a jpeg image > > to postscript? The current way TeXmacs does this is not fully correct. > I use jpeg2ps (http://www.pdflib.com/products/more/jpeg2ps.html). It > produces the most compact .eps files - it just inlines jpeg image (this > is allowed by PostScript, and ghostscript understands this).
I finally added jpeg2ps as a converter, as well as 'convert' from ImageMagick. It is true that the produced images by jpeg2ps are about 20 times smaller... _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
