Hello, Felix Breuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For use with literate programming, we would have two clones of every > code snippet. The one would reside in an "untangled" part of the document, > and the other would reside in the tangled part. Via some mechanism, we > could make sure that the content is actually stored in the tangled part > of the document, so that, given the new serialization format, we would > then get the tangled version of the code automatically. If the user > makes changes to the code via a text editor, there is no need to propagate > the changes to the untangled part, because the content is serialized only > once. Your clone idea seems, at first read, similar to my reference suggestion (albeit more elaborated ;). If I have understood correctly, the "serialized form" is compilable source code, that includes both original source code in a first part, with appropriate labels as comments, and a second texmacs part that references the code snippets in the first part, possibly re-ordered. When the user opens the LP file in texmacs, he only sees the re-ordered and literate version. Right? I like this idea. Best wishes, d. -- pub 1024D/A3AD7A2A 2004-10-03 David MENTRE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5996 CC46 4612 9CA4 3562 D7AC 6C67 9E96 A3AD 7A2A _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
