On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 05:09:48AM +0000, Felix Breuer wrote: > In the light of the literate programming discussion: Is it possible to > define a D.R.D. that says "the contents of this tag are supposed to be > serialized verbatim when using the literate serialization mechanism"?
Yes, that would be a typical DRD property. > > > 2) scripting language independence > > > > > > I think something was mentioned about making it possible to script > > > TeXmacs with other languages than scheme. What became of this? > > > > At the moment, I have no time for this. I would already be happy to > > have a decent and well document interface in Scheme. I also more and > > more believe that Scheme is a great scripting language for TeXmacs. > > I can live with Scheme. I was just asking out of interest. > > More important than a different language would be a more complete > documentation of the TeXmacs API, but I can understand that this is > a lot of work. Yes, especially because the API itself has to be made more robust during the documentation process (documenting things is a good way to discover things which should be improved). _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
