On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:02:15PM +0100, Miguel de Benito Delgado wrote: > - I don't like the idea of trying to develop a complete bibliography manager > inside TeXmacs. Not because it wouldn't be cool (*especially* if one could > annotate PDF documents in TeXmacs format, that would totally sell me into > it), but because it would be so much work it would never be as good as a > dedicated bibliography manager, even if it was better in some respects. Or so > I fear. Also, aiming for a sophisticated system effectively sets completion > time to "very distant future".
I don't think that the implementation of such a feature would be very hard. The main bottleneck is a sound way to deal with database information, but this will be needed sometime soon for several reasons. Best, --Joris _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
