On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:24 PM, François Poulain <fpoul...@metrodore.fr>wrote:
> If you intend to dynamically link TeXmacs, you will have to build and > maintain about one build environment by version and by OS on which you > want to consider. > Then why dynamically link? I'm happy with static linking or maybe bundling of the necessary libs. > Also, afaik, Denis is currently working on static build. > Meaning a tar.gz? or an .rpm? My proposal is an .rpm containing a statically linked TeXmacs and scripts setting up our own repo for auto updates. > If moreover, you consider to build "idiomatic" packages (.deb, .rpm, > etc.), you will have to provide some extra work, about dependencies, > unbundling, etc. > Then let's provide just the most popular one. Also, there are tools to install rpms in debian and viceversa, right? alien? -- Miguel de Benito.
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
