Hi, in fact static tarball does have problem with my 13.10 64 bits ubuntu version.
I really do share the interest of Miguel but since i don't code i don't talk. By the way, the svn version compiles and works like a charm under ubuntu 12.04 but shows some bugs under saucy. ML 2013/11/20 Joris van der Hoeven <vdhoe...@texmacs.org> > Hi Miguel, > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 02:16:14PM +0100, Miguel de Benito Delgado wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Joris van der Hoeven > > <vdhoe...@texmacs.org>wrote: > > > > > I think a .tar.gz remains the simplest option. > > > > IF one forgets about automatic updates. Or if we roll out our own > > auto-updates system. As I said it’s not difficult per se, just wasted > > effort since we have a proven mechanism for that, namely rpm. > > > > Why do you prefer writing an external tool to connect to the server, > parse > > the xml, check for updates, download, unpack, verify the signature and > > install, instead of adding a few lines to the TeXmacs.spec file? > > OK, then I have a nice challenge for you: produce a static rpm which works > on all Intel Linux architectures, evn those from about ten years ago. > Our current X11 static tarballs have this property. > > Best wishes, --Joris > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
