I don't see why the distros should not provide libguile 1 as well as libguile 2. They are clearly different enough to warrant it. On 5 Jun 2016 6:06 p.m., "Karl Hegbloom" <karl.hegbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Work was begun but not completed. I want to help complete it but have > other obligations right now so can't spend full time on it. I'm also not > necessarily the most qualified in terms of knowledge and experience, but > will try. The work that was done is on a branch in my git clone, on > github. It was a long time ago. > > I think that we should go straight to Guile 2.2. > > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016, 02:45 Ingolf Schaefer <ingolf.schae...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Am Samstag, 4. Juni 2016, 10:26:34 schrieb kamaraju kusumanchi: >> > I see that my name is mentioned in the maintainers of Debian package >> > of texmacs - http://www.texmacs.org/tmweb/download/linux.en.html#debian >> > . Could you please remove it? I stopped maintaining it a while ago. In >> > fact, Texmacs is removed from Debian unstable due to dependency on >> > guile-1.8 (Debian has moved to guile-2.0) and lack of maintainer >> > [1],[2]. >> > >> > >> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797833 >> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825252 >> > >> > thanks >> > raju >> Hi, >> >> I can confirm that a similar discussion is happening in Mageia community. >> I'm >> afraid that this will come for other Linux distributions as well in >> future. >> >> Is there any progress on a port to a recent Guile or another recent scheme >> dialect? >> >> Yours, >> >> Ingolf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Texmacs-dev mailing list >> Texmacs-dev@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
