On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:35 PM, Michael Sheets wrote:
Glad you like it - now that you (and allan, etc) have explained it to
me, I see a lot of use in the scope. Let's see what the rest of the
nitpickers have to say about the revision. :)
(This is why I wander into the room to be such a pain in the a**
about
things I don't understand right away... :D)
Jacobolus is too lame to post here even after I got the list on
Gmane, anyhow his thoughts are that he likes the general layout and
such. His only dislike was the word definition, he thinks it
doesn't really convey the concept as well as he'd like. Best we
could come up with as a substitute was element though, and allan
didn't really like it. Anyone know of any better word?
If I understand everything correctly, the declarations that you're
proposing to delimit with 'punctuation.definition' are the very same
inline data of the type in the Javascript subthread. Maybe use the
outcome of that discussion for consistency?
Using the 'structure' proposal, you'd have categories like:
punctuation.structure.table
punctuation.structure.string
...which makes sense to me.
Chris
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
