On 23/8/2006, at 19:53, Allan Odgaard wrote:
It would probably be more appropriate with something like:
data.atom.string
data.atom.constant
data.composite.array
data.composite.dictionary
...
Just a little nitpick -- strings are generally treated in languages
as arrays (with the possibility of addressing individual characters),
and so I don't think they should be called atoms. Symbols, on the
other hand, would. ;)
--
(desp)
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
