On Feb 16, 2007, at 3:02 PM, William D. Neumann wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Thomas Aylott (subtleGradient) wrote:
framework is just too vague.
Having OpenGL in the same category as RubyOnRails is just silly.
There are enough web frameworks to justify another main category.
web framework -- extra/more specific web related junk (Rails,
Django, Prototype, jQuery, …)
But isn't the point of tags to not overly specify the
classification of something? Isn't it more appropriate to tag
rails with both framework and web, and if the user wants to narrow
things they con specify that they want web + framework (+ ruby/
python/smalltalk/whatever)?
William D. Neumann
If we're actually going to be implementing a tags system, then
obviously yes.
afaik we were going to do the tags for future use and only actually
implement a single tag as a category in the actual TextMate UI.
If so, then lumping rails and jquery in with framework is a bad idea.
Lumping them into the web "category" would be best.
Ideally we'd implement a better UI in the app.
Where you can choose web, and then add on any of the web related
frameworks.
I was planning something like that affect for bundleforge and the new
getbundles stuff.
thomas Aylott — subtleGradient — CrazyEgg — sixteenColors
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
