On Tue May 15 12:53 , 'Thomas Aylott (subtleGradient)' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > You've done some awesome awesome stuff! :D
:) >Bracketed version of the language [...] >Is anyone else interested in having that option available?[..] Possibly... >Or should it be in the main language and people can choose their theme to >either show it or hide it. >This option would let us make some more precise assumptions for some >commands/snippets.CodeCompletion If it gives us finer control then I'm all for it. >Right now there seem to be 3 codecompletion commands in the core actioscript3 >bundle. >Personally I hate having to choose, I'd like it to just pick the best option >depending on context. Agreed, this is on my TODO list, but if you get there first then that'd be great. >We could simply add a scope for any line that starts with import. I'd like a looser scope (so I don't have to type import). However this would be fine, I'm planning on developing a add import command which would look up the import then place the line in the imports list automatically. But there's a lot of other things TODO first. >I LOVE what you've done with the function completion command! >I'm so glad I added that feature to my codecompletion library ;) >I knew it'd come in handy Thank you for the library ! >There are some other random things in the syntax that I'd like to see improved. >Things that I can do: >Adding a scope for lines that begin with import >Combining the import completion commands >Adding a bracketed version of the language >Minor syntax tweaks/additions > >I really don't want to step on anyones toes and I want to do things that will >improve this stuff for everyone. Don't worry, leap in, improve, we can argue later if we really need to... _______________________________________________ textmate-dev mailing list textmate-dev@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
