On 5 Dec 2007, at 21:32, Thomas Aylott wrote:
New MooTools language for MooTools 1.2.
Kept the old language around as v1.x
Is there a reason to keep the 1.1 around (other than potential
problems with 1.2)?
If not, 1.1 should be “patched” into 1.2 (i.e. so the svn diff/log
reveals the exact changes made to turn the syntax into 1.2).
Changed:
A trunk/Review/Bundles/JavaScript MooTools.tmbundle/Syntaxes/
MooTools 1_x.tmLanguage
U trunk/Review/Bundles/JavaScript MooTools.tmbundle/Syntaxes/
MooTools.tmLanguage
U trunk/Review/Bundles/JavaScript MooTools.tmbundle/info.plist
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
