On Dec 10, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Thomas Aylott - subtleGradient wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
The reason to keep them sorted separately is if there is some reason
why they should not choose one of those syntaxes. In this particular
case it doesn't matter what they choose since they aren't losing out
on any absolutely necessary functionality.
I didn't think I was doing anything controversial before either, so
I'm not sure how controversial my plans are. Perhaps I should run
them by the community before I implement anything new.
My only point was that if there isn't any reason anyone would
intentionally want one or the other then why provide a obvious option
as to confuse people? Need I really go find some nifty acronym to
point to that says keep worthless options to a minimum? ;)
The only place I can see it mattering here is that Dreamer has
complained how much slower the punctuation scopes have made pastes
as it adds a lot of overhead to the HTML parser. Tab/space scopes
could easily quadruple them.
There should probably be some sort of blacklist of scopes that
aren't converted into html.
All punctuation and whitespace scopes would be pretty useless
converted to html I would think.
Where does the code for that sit? I may take a crack at it.
TextMate bundle, it's already been tackled by Scott Stevenson; but he
hasn't submitted the code. But his post might be a good starting point.
http://theocacao.com/document.page/517
_______________________________________________
textmate-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
