Michael's right - it's easy to repurpose an existing scope. But this is all very poorly explained. I found it most useful to browse though a couple of good language files, copying how they've done it, and mix and matching between approaches to cover all the features you need.
What's an example of some semantics that you couldn't find an existing scope standard for? On 17 Mar 2011, at 08:52, Michael Sheets wrote: > On Mar 9, 2011, at 3:33 PM, Florian Jug wrote: > >> I wrote my own bundle. It comes along with some new scopes. > > The answer is to not use the new scopes. If every bundle created a new set of > scopes we'd very quickly have chaos. It's not important that the scopes be > perfectly 'correct' as long as they are consistent. Using the standard scopes > gives you many benefits, among them being the theme support. > _______________________________________________ > textmate-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate-dev _______________________________________________ textmate-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate-dev
