On 17 Jun 2014, at 18:08, Attila Györffy wrote:
Having said that, I’d like to know what’s stopping us from using that Ruby interpreter (let it be 1.8 or 2.0 or anything further) in Bundles? […]
There is probably a lot of string/character handling in bundle commands, which is one of the main major changes from 1.8 → 1.9/2.0.
For example 1.8 represent characters as integers, e.g. ?A and "a"[0] both evaluate to 65. In ruby 2.0 those two things evaluate to "a" (a string).
There is no jcode/jlength in 2.0 but the native string’s length method return number of code point.
There are a few other minor things, for example fork/exec will close file descriptors by default in 2.0 but not 1.8, and the “opt out” argument is 2.0 only.
But I’ll welcome patches that can make the code run on both versions of ruby. It’s just easier (for me) with the suggested migration plan (which includes bundling ruby for users which only have one version on their system), and it should minimize the chance of anything breaking.
_______________________________________________ textmate-dev mailing list textmate-dev@lists.macromates.com http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate-dev
