Pranam As usual analysis of Freudian analysis of errors and confusions. Andrew Agassi had advocate dthe liking for the tennis even at the time of preaching before tennis students classes ; one reporting direct evidence is from my grand son an ardent tennis player and playing for his school; the problems of the bottom and the top is similar; HAD NO FAITH BUT; when Agassi said I hate Tennis at an age when he did not know anything or at an age when the career ended, on both sides, the say has no value; the reality is the contradiction ,"“Even if it’s not your ideal life, you can always choose it. No matter what your life is, choosing it changes everything.”; what is ideal and when it is formed?; without maturity any formation of an ideal is only a night sleep dream; in the course of maturing it is formed out of hard work so adopted; choosing is one,s right but without a root nothing can be chosen; can you at senior citizen age choose a govt career?; so choice is a conditional one; we believe in the confusion that either or one is chosen which is nothing but tossing of the coin; Agassi and Federer had opposite viewa; the concentration outlived the touch and go viz federer thus over took the sustenance. K R IRS 9121
On Sat, 9 Jan 2021 at 08:05, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > https://perell.com/essay/the-price-of-discipline/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZor3a3m5HsNX6ynaUboigCX%3DJdExGL5GYu1_vHO0bEJEjg%40mail.gmail.com.
