Fine sri Venkata Giriji K R IRS 20321

On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 at 23:51, venkat giri <[email protected]> wrote:

> *Respected Sir/s,*
> *                                     "यद् भावं तद् भवति"       *
> *                          WHAT YOU THINK YOU BECOME...*
> *                              Yat bhavam tat bhavati" which translates
> to                              "As you think, so you become*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> * 1.Keep thy thoughts, words and actions all in coherence!Rigveda 10.90.2
> (Purusha Sukta):पुरुष एवेदं सर्वं यद्भूतं यच्च भव्यम्।उतामृतत्वस्येशानो
> यदन्नेनातिरोहति॥ १०.०९०.०२purusha evedaGM sarvam | yad bhUtam yac ca
> bhavyam |utAmRtatvasyeshAnaH | yad annenAtirohati || 2 ||The term "यद् भावं
> तद् भवति" may be the modification of "यद् भुतं यच्च भव्यम्"2.Brihadaranyaka
> Upanishad 1.5.18:पृथिव्यै चैनमग्नेश्च दैवी वागाविशति । सा वै दैवी वाग्यया
> यद्यदेव वदति तत्तद्भवति ॥ १८ ॥I-v-18: The divine organ of speech from the
> earth and fire permeates him. That is the divine organ of speech through
> which whatever he says is fulfilled.3.The 8.6th verse of Bhagavad Gita
> conveys similar message to "as you think so you become":यं यं वापि
> स्मरन्भावं त्यजत्यन्ते कलेवरम् |तं तमेवैति कौन्तेय सदा तद्भावभावित: ||
> 6||yaṁ yaṁ vāpi smaran bhāvaṁ tyajatyante kalevaramtaṁ tam evaiti kaunteya
> sadā tad-bhāva-bhāvitaḥ     Whatever one remembers upon giving up the body
> at the time of death, O son of Kunti, one attains that state, being always
> absorbed in such contemplation. 8.6 O son of Kunti, thinking of any entity
> whichever it may be one gives up the body at the end, he attains that very
> one, having been always engrossed in its thought.4.   Which is also said by
> Shandilya (Chhandogya Upanishad 3.14.4) सर्वकर्मा सर्वकामः सर्वगन्धः
> सर्वरसः सर्वमिदमभ्यात्तोऽवाक्यनादर एष म आत्मान्तर्हृदय एतद्ब्रह्मैतमितः
> प्रेत्याभिसंभवितास्मीति यस्य स्यादद्धा न विचिकित्सास्तीति ह स्माह
> शाण्डिल्यः शाण्डिल्यः ॥ ३.१४.४ ॥sarvakarmā sarvakāmaḥ sarvagandhaḥ
> sarvarasaḥ sarvamidamabhyātto'vākyanādara eṣa ma ātmāntarhṛdaya
> etadbrahmaitamitaḥ pretyābhisaṃbhavitāsmīti yasya syādaddhā na
> vicikitsāstīti ha smāha śāṇḍilyaḥ śāṇḍilyaḥ || 3.14.4 ||              He
> who is the sole creator, whose desires are the desires of all, whose odours
> are the odours of all, whose tastes are the tastes of all, who is
> everywhere, who has no sense organs, and who is free from desires—he is my
> Self and is in my heart. He is no other than Brahman. When I leave this
> body, I shall attain him. He who firmly believes this has no doubt in his
> mind. [He will surely attain Brahman.] This is what Śāṇḍilya has said
>              Man is a creature of his Kratumaya (क्रतुमयः, will, purpose).
> Let him therefore have for himself this will, this purpose: The
> intelligent, whose body is imbued with life-principle, whose form is light,
> whose thoughts are driven by truth, whose self is like space (invisible but
> ever present), from whom all works, all desires, all sensory feelings
> encompassing this whole world, the silent, the unconcerned, this is me, my
> Self, my Soul within my heart. — Chandogya Upanishad 3.14.1 – 3.14.3*
> *5.सुभाषितरत्नभाण्डागार.     *
>
>
>
>
>
> *यथा चित्तं तथा वाचः यथा वाचस्तथा क्रियाःचित्ते वाचि क्रियायाञ्च
> साधूनामेकरूपताyathaa chittaM tathaa vaachaH yathaa vaachastathaa
> kriyaaHchitte vaachi kriyaayaa~ncha saadhUnaamekarUpataa-
> subhaaShitaratnabhaaNDaagaaraThe actions (of noble people) are in sync with
> their speech which is in sync with their thoughts. There is harmony in
> thoughts, words and actions of the noble.Meaning:As the mind is so is the
> speech, as is the speech so is the action; there is uniformity in the mind,
> diction and action of the noble.             But the noble have uniformity
> in their thoughts, words and deeds. They think their actions through before
> acting and stick to them too. They speak in coherence with their actions.
> In such a person, one can trust that he will do as he says and he says as
> he thinks. There is no hypocrisy. That evenness in these 3 faculties makes
> them noble.                                In reality, irrespective of
> being certified 'noble', such people lead a much more happier and peaceful
> life. Just keeps things simple for them as they do not have to keep track
> of 3 different things  Life suddenly seems more straight forward and
> untangled. They are trusted better by others.RegardsV..SridharanTrichy    *
>
> On Thursday, 18 March, 2021, 09:21:39 am IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Pranam
>
> WHAT YOU THINK YOU BECOME.
>
>
>
>      Yat Bhaavam Tat Bhavathi- WHAT YOU THINK YOU BECOME.
>
>  *Bg. 8.6  *यं यं वापि स्मरन्भावं त्यजत्यन्ते कलेवरम् ।
> तं तमेवैति कौन्तेय सदा तद्भ‍ावभावित: ॥ ६ ॥
>
>
>
>
> *yaṁ yaṁ vāpi smaran bhāvaṁ tyajaty ante kalevaram taṁ tam evaiti kaunteya
> sadā tad-bhāva-bhāvitaḥ*
>
> Whatever state of being one remembers when he quits his body, O son of
> Kuntī, that state he will attain without fail. {story of AJAMEELAN IN
> bhAGAVATHAM).
>
>
>
>       While light travels at the rate of 1,86,000 miles per second,
> thoughts virtually travel in no time.
>
> Thought is finer than ether, the medium of electricity. In broadcasting, a
> singer sings beautiful songs at Calcutta. You can hear them nicely through
> the radio set in your own house at Delhi. All messages are received through
> the wireless. Manas or mind-substance fills all space like ether and it
> serves as the vehicle for thoughts, as Prana is the vehicle for feeling, as
> ether is the vehicle for heat, light and electricity and as air is the
> vehicle for sound. . It can be transmitted from one man to another man. The
> powerful thoughts of great sages and Rishis of yore are still recorded in
> the Akasa (Akasic records). Thoughts are living things. If the food is
> pure, thought also becomes pure. He who has pure thoughts speaks very
> powerfully and produces deep impression on the minds of the hearers by his
> speech. He influences thousands of persons through his pure thoughts.
> (chandogya Upanishad). Entire universe is in reality the projection of the
> human mind—*Manomatram Jagat*. Purification and control of the mind is
> the central aim of all Yogas.
>
>              Man is the master of his own destiny. You yourself make, by
> the power of your thought, your destiny. You can undo it if you like. All
> faculties, energies and powers are latent in you. Unfold them, and become
> free and great. The face is a faithful recorder and a sensitive
> registering apparatus to register and record all the thoughts that are in
> your mind.
>
> The face is a polished mirror to indicate the nature of the mind and its
> contents at a particular time. You have entirely in your own hands to
> determine the order of thought you entertain and consequently the order of
> influence you attract and are not mere willowy creatures of circumstances,
> unless indeed you choose to be. A man of discrimination is always careful,
> vigilant and circumspect. He always watches carefully his thoughts. He
> introspects. He knows what is going on in his mental factory what Vritti or
> Guna is prevailing at a particular time. He never allows any evil thought
> to enter the gates of his mental factory. He at once nips them in the bud.
> By his good thinking, by watching the nature of his thoughts, by
> introspection, by active noble thinking, the man of discrimination builds
> his noble character, forms his high destiny. He is careful in his speeches.
> He speaks little. He speaks sweet loving words. He never utters any kind of
> harsh words that can affect the feelings of others. He develops patience,
> mercy and universal love. He tries to speak truth. Thus he puts a check on
> the Vak-Indriya and the impulses of speech. He uses measured words. He
> writes measured lines. This produces deeply profound and favourable
> impression on the minds of the people.
>
>
>
>           Mind carries aura—mental aura or psychic aura. The Sanskrit
> term for aura is Tejas. It is brilliance or halo that emanates from the
> phenomenon of mind. In those who have sought the full development of their
> minds, we find it extremely effulgent. It is capacitated to travel long
> distances and affect in the most beneficial manner a large number of
> persons who are privileged to come under its influence. It must be noted
> that the spiritual aura is far more powerful than either psychic or Pranic
> or mental aura. Man sows a thought and reaps an action. He sows an action
> and reaps a habit. He sows a habit and reaps a character. He sows a
> character and reaps a destiny.  Man has made his own destiny by his own
> thinking and acting. He can change his destiny. He is the master of his own
> destiny. There is no doubt of this. By right thinking and strong exertion,
> he can become the master of his destiny. Dacoit Ratnakar was changed into
> Sage Valmiki. Jagai and Madai were transformed. They were rogues of the
> first waters. You can become a Yogi or a Jnani. You can make your destiny.
>
> Thinking causes time, space, etc. Stop this thinking through Vairagya and
> Abhyasa, and merge yourself in the Pure Consciousness. Where there is no
> thinking or Sankalpa, there is Absolution or Jivanmukti. KR  IRS 18321
>
> On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 07:03, cnu pne <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thinking is a faculty that is most developed in the human beings. There
> can be various kinds of thinking. Thinking for accomplishing something is
> the most common type of thinking. This thinking is rather utilitarian and
> sometimes takes the greatness away from thinking and is better-called
> planning. Then, there is thinking about almost anything, out of anxiety.
> This is what is called worrying. Most people spend their entire lives
> switching between planning and worrying and some overdo it to such an
> extent that they are unable to tell the difference. However, both modes of
> thought are in truth disgrace to the faculty of thinking.
>
> There is another, rather popular, mode of thinking—imagination. It is also
> a different way of thinking, only more interesting and fanciful, because it
> has the therapeutic effect of remedying whatever has gone wrong in the
> individual and social life, albeit only in someone’s mind. Also,
> imagination gives much hope to people caught up in the humongous pressure
> of making a living. Even the wealthy have the stress of maintaining their
> standard of living and much more stressful is the artificially created need
> to maintain a good image among the others. It is in this context of a
> maddeningly strained world that imagination comes as a rescue—imagination
> through stories, written or performed. Recent worldwide increase in the
> public interest in fantasy proves that imagination is seen more as an
> essential escape route to get away from the binding realities of life, than
> as a source of entertainment.
>
> Apart from the above mentioned three ways of thinking, there is a mode of
> thought that can only be truly called thinking, that of critical thinking.
>
> Critical thinking has led to all the development of human civilisation as
> we see it. When the legendary apple fell, it was critical thinking that led
> to the discovery of the gravitational force. It was critical thinking that
> led to a new discovery when some water spilt from the bathtub. More
> recently, it was decades of critical thinking that led to the discovery of
> gravitational waves. Critical thinking requires that all observed data is
> systematically analysed, evaluated, and conceptualised.
>
> Here, the process of thinking starts right from the process of observation
> and so, the observation has to be as precise as possible and also such
> observation should not be affected by any extraneous elements or phenomena.
> For example, if a person is observing another person from a distance, the
> observer’s culture and upbringing affect the manner in which the observed
> person is seen. Most of the time, such an observation fails to be critical.
> Only if the observer can free oneself from all preconceived notions and
> other mental baggage will it be possible for the observer to make a
> critical and unbiased observation.
>
> Reason is the bedrock of critical thinking. Without a rationale or logic
> to build upon, critical thinking is impossible. Any logical method tainted
> by selfish interests ceases to be logical. Selfishness is the ultimate bias
> of all logic. That is why we see that a carefully thought out structure of
> anything is inexplicably destroyed because of some vested interest. For
> instance, when an organisation has to buy some equipment, sometimes it is
> seen that in spite of getting many quotes for the equipment, the order is
> given to a firm based on some personal preferences. This destroys the very
> foundation of critical thinking. Sometimes, people have ridiculously
> irrational ideas or notions about some people, countries, or cultures
> because of their perceptions that have never been critically analysed.
>
> The litmus test of critical thinking is that one should be able to
> critically analyse oneself. That is, the very observer critically analyses
> oneself. The tendency to analyse the other is very common, but to analyse
> oneself is a rare trait. This is where candour enters critical thinking.
> Without being candid about oneself, particularly about one’s weaknesses and
> failings, logic can be twisted to achieve practically anything that one
> desires. The proverbial devil starts quoting the scriptures and in no time
> something that is viscerally understood to be wrong gets the sanction of
> logic! This is why unselfishness is very important in critical thinking.
>
> That brings us to a more important question. Is it possible for people to
> be unselfish? What would happen to critical thinking then? Yes, it is
> difficult to become completely unselfish, particularly for a person, who
> does not have any divine calling or does not live a spiritual life. And
> therefore, it is equally difficult to practise critical thinking in its
> true form. It is not surprising, therefore, to note that across the world,
> the first attempts at philosophy or science, were made not in laboratories
> or universities, but in monasteries; not by scientists or teachers, but by
> monks dedicated to knowing the final truth about God and this universe. It
> would not be entirely wrong to assume that the unselfish lifestyle of
> monastics led them to chart a path towards the unbiased analysis of
> observed data.
>
> What we learn out of this discussion is that for being truly logical or
> critical in one’s thought, one needs to be mercilessly candid about
> oneself, or to put it in simpler terms, to be uncompromisingly truthful.
> Most of those claiming to practise truthfulness are really critical only of
> the others, and not of themselves. This is hypocrisy of the worst kind.
> Critical thinking requires that each aspect of the data observed gets the
> same kind of logical and systematic analysis. There cannot be a selective
> analysis nor a hypothesis or notion that has to be proven, which would
> obviously lead the data to be interpreted in a manner that supports the
> hypothesis. That is why many scientific experiments start with great
> enthusiasm but fail miserably because the initial enthusiasm was generated
> by a wrong reading of the observed data.
>
> Logical fallacies are one of the biggest hurdles in critical thinking.
> Just as the Advaitin would call this entire universe as an illusion, there
> are many ways of illusory thinking. For example, one of the major fallacies
> is the failure to consider all the causes that lead to an event or
> phenomenon. Then, there is the fallacy of mistaking correlation for
> causation. If an event happens with another event, instead of considering
> it as a case of correlation, many consider it to be the cause, thereby
> declaring that one event is dependent upon another. Also, there may be many
> aspects of a problem and that problem cannot be properly analysed without
> considering all the aspects. However, we see in practice that many aspects
> of a problem are simply ignored while trying to solve a problem.
>
> One could conclude that without an unselfish nature and complete
> dedication to the knowledge of the truth, it is impossible to have complete
> and undiluted critical thinking. It can be said that true critical thinking
> is possible only when one sees the reality of one’s own nature and also of
> the manifested world, this universe.
>
> Author is Editor of Prabuddha Bharata.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/C73FB47F-4CC0-44E6-9936-15B875DCABAB%40gmail.com
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooDC7M%2Bekzchej1i_zG7c%2BWN0Df-NdPBrSoceFZDvszdQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooDC7M%2Bekzchej1i_zG7c%2BWN0Df-NdPBrSoceFZDvszdQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZors%3DOBJMPDtenoM%3Dqi66fVyAtMgbeBusb6qBjnaCUC0Cw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to