Mr Rajaram,
There is a saying in Tamil translated to English- There is no purpose in
blowing conch in the ears of a deaf person.
There is also another saying translated to English - One can wake up a person
who is sleeping, not pretending as sleeping. You are the best example of both.
Both suits to you. You want to abuse others in the forum. A cultured man will
never do so. Nothing more.
As Mr Sai, moderator has asked you two times- Can you limit your responses. You
NEED NOT EDUCATE ME. Let me remain ignorant and stupid in your view. I will
continue my postings
Gopalakrishnan.
On Sunday, 12 December, 2021, 12:25:21 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy
<[email protected]> wrote:
PranamMy dear Gopalaskrishnan I am yet to see such a predicament at 78 an
aviveki who does not know not only What is needed but also the English since I
know a comment passed by your superior on your draft; shall I produce? Ignorant
has only one true meaning and there is nothing as one to you and one to me; I
did not call you a fool, but only stupid and ignorant; I said rebut it as I do
with the evidences on text presented as true or false or add more to the
content . but as your Guru, there is no use of NETI NETI; the person who writes
that sex as from Puranas are depicted in Kajuraho cannot escape the ignorance
because you place a headline that it will only bw erraneous because It does not
belong to me; it is stupidity; when you write you have the vicarious liability
of /for the contemnts you offer; you have not expressed anything with the
evidence as to what you wrote is correct. You only wrote to someone ( I can
publish that letter also) whom you addressed then AS GURU, who concluded that
GAYA SRARDHAM IS NOT THE END; but you stood as BAdA-KHANa and repeating
wherever and whenever you write; but you neither denied it with any evidence.
Your low level makes you think to write in groups the contents, and private
email to so many, which does reveal your low-confidence. And as far your
English for that matter many writers English has defects which I am not
concerned with as I am an Indian and I Don't bother about it as I am or for
that matter anyone hereinafter are not going to print and sell books or earn
in their life; also the content shall be understood and for that one needs the
Vivekam which you lack; i say this since you are trying to act as Nakkeran but
you are not capable of that too,.. You get beaten by your own act and your
false friendship. As long as you present truth as untruth I shall say what is
right; you may differ if you had an authority not your Paramartha guru as I
know you never respect anyone as your Guru at any time, but wants your |I am a
retd AGM '' introduction and lots of emails, hoard it in your box, keep
reproducing, unaware of what you are doing, and also want Parama veera chakra
and padma Bhushan. If you can, you can have it along with your friend. Have a
nice life. KR IRS 12/12/21 { as so many had written about you including your
guru, as to what you are, you are establishing only what you are ; some people
till end only stay like that; to be frank at times I think your write in reply
appears asif a 1st class student only; also pl note the terms and conditions of
the Google group which is controlled only by the Google and so please do not
waste your time marking to someone)
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 15:09, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:
PranamMr G I have written only the lexicon in English and sanskrit AND YOU
WRITE JUISTIFYING MY TEXT. KR IRS 111221
On Sat, 11 Dec 2021 at 13:22, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:
Mr Rajaram,You conveniently avoided meaning of ignorent. Write the meaning of
it.That itself shows your hiding nature. Have you went through meaning of
compilation? Look at your back before blaming other's back.
Gopalakrishnan
On Saturday, 11 December, 2021, 12:24:10 pm IST, Rajaram Krishnamurthy
<[email protected]> wrote:
PranamMr G as usual fawn (to court favour by a cringing or flattering manner)
if one is in excess, and will jump high when people are good to him; his
revelation of the stupendous mannerism is the way right from his office days,
so no one shall be surprised by his utterances 'I am not a broad-minded". That
is his usual pattern. Let it be. {stupid is lacking ordinary quickness and
keenness of mind; dull. characterized by or proceeding from mental dullness;
foolish; senseless:a stupid question. tediously dull, especially due to lack of
meaning or sense; inane; pointless: a stupid party. annoying or irritating;
troublesome: Turn off that stupid radio. in a state of stupor; stupefied:}.
{ignorant: lacking in knowledge or training; unlearned: an ignorant man.
lacking knowledge or information as to a particular subject or fact: ignorant
of quantum physics.uninformed; unaware. due to or showing lack of knowledge or
training:} Now what is avivekam?. [Aviveka (अविवेक).—a. Wanting in
judgment or discrimination, thoughtless. -kaḥ 1 Want of discrimination or
judgment, absence of prudence, imprudence; अविवेकः परमापदां पदम् (avivekaḥ
paramāpadāṃ padam) Ki.2.3. 2) Hastiness, rashness, recklessness. 3)
Ignorance;(anyonyatādātmyarūpamithyājñānam). 4) Non separation,
non-distinction; पौरुषं कर्म दैवं च कालवृत्तिस्वभावतः ।
त्रयमेतत्पृथग्भूतमविवेकं तु केचन (pauruṣaṃ karma daivaṃ ca kālavṛttisvabhāvataḥ
| trayametatpṛthagbhūtamavivekaṃ tu kecana) || Mb.12.238.5.] Now what is
wrong when he says that "I am not"?. No regrets Keep carrying on Mr G KR IRS
111221
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 at 21:03, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123
<[email protected]> wrote:
Respected Mr Sekar,
I am not such a broad minded person to sympathise with Mr Rajaram, a person
who call me ignorent and stupid or write against a member who only responds
paying back in the same coin.
Please observe, I have not used any disrespective language to Mr Rajaram. He
only abuses me. Since I am marking his mails to spam, many times I miss his
immature language abusing posts on me.
Let Mr Rajaram Krishnamurthy keep up his image as former IRS. For the
information of all the members of this forum Mr Narayanaswamy stopped
responding to him, asked excuse, but Mr Rajaram never bothered to use words
like excuse,sorry etc.
As desired by you I am posting this response to groups, marking copy to
moderator also for his intervention. Mr Narayanaswamy is a critic of me, but
when he found Mr Rajaram and Mr APS Mani tried to trap and used adverse
criticisam on me, wrote in my support showing instances.
Today I have seen a response from Mr Sawaminathan for stopping all abusive
postings between members.
Respected Mr Sekar, I am sorry like many others, I too do not desire to
express any thing, and never like to symapthise with Mr Rajaram who called me
IGNORENT, STUPID.
Shall I poss a question to you, will you keep quiet if Mr Rajaram call you the
above?
I am ashamed Mr Rajaram is a former IRS. A class 1 officer never use such
stupid language in the forum against another.
Gopalakrishnan
On Friday, 10 December, 2021, 06:57:05 pm IST, Narayanaswamy Sekar
<[email protected]> wrote:
Yes I am n sekar51yahoo.
You always thank Sri n iyer for his support but can't keep mum when he
disgraces himself by his vulgar and disgraceful comments about a member's
mother.I would have responded if I supported Sri n iyer for his support to me
but nothing like that happened.Others also did not support or Expressed support
or thanks to him only you did.So you have that responsibility.Disgusting,
vulgar, degrading comments about our mothers by the person you admire, just
because he supports you.
Pl reply to nsekar51 if you want but I will understand ur silence.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 5:04 PM gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:
Sir,I don't understand what the content of the mail pertains to me. He wrote
about me ignorent and I have replied to it. Today he has added another
adjective stupid. My reply relates to his comment on me. Are you Mr Nsekar 51
or different person, since ID is found different. My mails have nothing to do
with Mr Narayanswamy's responses. I stand on my own leg.
What I understand is that- Once Sri Rajaram wrote - my wife can be a
orostitute. He may be keeping the mail. I mark his mails to spamRegarding my
objecting Mr Narayanaswamy response. why should I alone object while all other
members keep quiet including moderator.Regarding Mr Narayanaswamy he comes to
rescue me some times, when Sri Rajaram and his friend tries to trap me and get
me out of the group. I hope this reply is in order to your response.
Gopalakrishnan
On Friday, 10 December, 2021, 06:10:58 pm IST, Narayanaswamy Sekar
<[email protected]> wrote:
Do you agree with sri N Iyer's comment about sri. Rajaram's mother - see the
last para in his MailIf not, will you have the courage to write to the group
saying you disagree with those comments.
It is an insult to all mothers.You can have ur fight with Sri. Rajaram as I had
mine with him, but can't drag his mother.Or will you keep silent as sri. N iyer
supports you
Since these were with respect to ur posts, you need to take a stand.
Do what your conscience says.
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021, 2:17 PM Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote:
Dear folks
Let me first congratulate my utterly shameless imitator for again flattering me
most sincerely by reproducing without consent my original phrase "a total
ignoramus nonentity" describing him accurately.
Let me then puncture neatly and swiftly a fart-filled balloon or two floated by
him in his post below.
"Rigveda is a Veda in form of Sukti's, which mean 'beautiful statements'. A
collection of very beautifully composed incantations itself is a Sukta. The
Sukta is a hymn and is composed of a set of Riks. 'Rik' means - an incantation
that contains praises and Veda means knowledge. The knowledge of the Suktas
itself is the literal meaning of Rigveda. Rigveda (ऋग्वेद ṛgveda) is
a.........."
My comments:-
There is no such thing as a sukti. A sooktham is a collection of riks, or
manthrams, like durga sooktham (yajur-vedam), paavamaana sooktham(purification
invocation in punyaaham rite), purusha sooktham (hymn to the primal vedic
being), aayushya sooktham (for long life), navagraha sooktham (prayer to the
nine planets and their attending devathass), nakshathra sooktham (prayer to the
27 stars and their attending devathaas, the Sun and other celestial entities).
It is curious that our total ignoramus nonentity who earlier angrily insisted
that his favoured vedam is "Rik-vedam" (derived from the word"rik") and not
"r'g vedam", has now gracelessly capitulated and conceded that it is indeed
(ऋग्वेद ṛgveda).
"Like all of the Vedas, Rigveda is organized into three parts
1. Samhita2. Brahman3. Aranyaka"
My comments:-
The witless twit from the fathomless cesspit is blissfully unaware that our
vedams also have a fourth part, i.e. their own Upanishads.
He now boldly lies that his pet favourite vedam has no Upanishad!
And he claims to be Yajur Veda, which vedam certainly has the taittireeya
upanishad of which he is totally unaware.
"The Guru and the stupid sishya who cannot distinguish the differences between
the CHEKKU AND THE sIVALINGM....... Then both become GURUs to Paramacharyal,
who alone wrote that as a treatise to Soundaruya lahari which I HAD QUOTED."
My comments:-
Is this not the same flatulent fool from the cess-pool who could not tell
goddess Kaumari, one of the sapthamaathrukas, from smallpox-inflicting and
children's-spreading demoness karumaari?
We all know that the chekku is the large rural oil-mill powered by draught
animals such as oxen and buffaloes employing which we extract gingelly oil from
ripe dried sesame seeds, and that the Shiva-lingam is the consecrated black
granite cylinder with a hemispheric top on which on auspicious occasions we
solemnly pour twelve types of prescribed offerings in a ritual called
abhishegam.
Can the incorrigible idiot tell a cheruman from a cherukkan? Or an olakkai
from a kunthaani? Or an ezhunthiram from an aattukkal?
"Paila made reader of the Rich; Vaiśampáyana of the Yajush; Jaimini of the
Shun; and Sumantu of the Atharvan. Súta appointed to teach the historical
poems."
My comments:-
For the scoundrel without equal, his earlier "Rics" and "Rik" have now become
Rich, of which Paila is a mere reader, not a shishya, nor a student, nor an
apprentice under training, nor a custodian? Not at all a trainee-teacher?
Compounding the confusion over "the Rich" is the mystery over "the Shun" of
which Jaimini is only the reader, like a visitor to an exhibition or to a
bookstall, or a library.
To top the blind-man's-bluff comedy of errors is the inscrutable collection of
"historical poems" which one Suta is " appointed to teach".
Before the primordial Aadi Parabrahmam or the primordial Aadi Paraashakthi
existed there were "historical poems"? Who composed them? When? On the
history of what? How many?
"I really had to rebuke the sage ( i.e. the Kaanchi Kaamakoti peetaathipathi
Paramaachaariyar Swaami Sree Chandrashekarendra Shankaraachaaariyar) for not
becoming the student of the Guru Narayanswamy and classmate of
Gopalakrishnan!!!. Of Course the sage has no right to have maintained a MUTT
at all."
My comments:-
Are these the words of a Chennai Tamil Hindu Brahmin? Or of a chandaalan,
illegitimate issue from the womb of a Brahmin woman who parted her legs for sex
with a shoodran, i.e. a class beneath a Dalit born of Dalit parents and
descended from alone of Dalits?
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
On 10 Dec 2021, at 2:18 PM, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote:
Pranam
The ignoramus nonentity awaiting the guillotines Paramartha Guru followed up by
the sishya of what is being written writes, "write From Rig veda instead of
from Yajur veda. ". Guru did a saka haphazard and dwell on that all the time,
without even giving any treatise beyond the abuses and NETI NETI pralabam.
Sishya thinks the Guru is perfect and ignorantly without verification if any
and unaware of what is what, quotes brick by brick, thinking what is quoted is
from the YAJURVEDA AND the quote is wrongly mentioned as RIG VEDA sutras.
Theer are many in Kerala and Tamilnadu who do not even can comprehend their
mother tongue nor speak a perfect their mother tongue, but has the audacity to
call others as PETER OODARE etc and make fun; so too the Guru and Sishya, whose
grammatical and text meaning if graphed , the herGraph may explode. The Guru
and the stupid sishya who cannot distinguish the differences between the
CHEKKU AND THE sIVALINGM, CALLS A TUNE; SAYS THE VERSES ARE FROM yAJURVEDAM AND
NOT FROM rIG vEDAM. Then both become GURUs to Paramacharyal, who alone wrote
that as a treatise to Soundaruya lahari which I HAD QUOTED BELOW AS COURTESY.
wHO DOESN'T KNOW eNGLISH?. Me?. Or the Nara Gopala?. A person who cannot know
that the sutras are from Yajurveda wrote and delivered contents, so long which
continued unabated ; I really had to rebuke the sage for not becoming the
student of the Guru Narayanswamy and classmate of Gopalakrishnan!!!. Of
Course the sage has no right to have maintained a MUTT at all. The fence
sitters can even now watch the bull fight like kids in the group unashamedly. 2
YUJ” INSANSKRIT MEANS United, Joint; Yuj (युज्).—I. 7 U. (yunakti,
yuṅkte, yuyoja, yuyuje,ayujat, ayaukṣīt, ayukta, yokṣyati-te, yoktum, yukta)
1) To join, unite, attach, connect, add; तमर्थमिव भारत्या सुतया योक्तुमर्हसि
(tamarthamivabhāratyā sutayā yoktumarhasi) Ku.6.79; see pass. below.
2) To yoke, harness, put to; भानुः सकृ
Rigveda is a Vedain form of Sukti's, which mean 'beautiful statements'.
Acollection of very beautifully composed incantations itself is a Sukta. The
Sukta is a hymn and iscomposed of a set of Riks. 'Rik' means - an incantation
that contains praisesand Veda means knowledge. The knowledge of the Suktas
itself is the literal meaning of Rigveda.Rigveda (ऋग्वेद ṛgveda) is a
compoundof ṛc "praise, verse" and veda "knowledge".”
1A: The Rigveda “Richas”comprises mainly of the praisesof God. Other than
this it also has incantations containing thoughtswhich are evolved by the sages
through their minute observation, contemplationand analysis. Every element of
nature was an issue to contemplate upon for thesages. In this process they have
randomly even spoken about the mysteries ofthe universe, which are not only
worth reading but also for practical usage.
Rigvedais the oldest Veda and like all of the Vedas, itis organized into three
parts:
1. Samhita
2. Brahmana
3. Aranyaka
These mantras are filed with good thoughts and they havethe ability to inspire
us greatly. The ultimate aim of all these mantras is topurify the human mind
through knowledge. Darkness is symbol of lack ofknowledge or illusionary
living, which makes us devoid of justness andsagacity.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
3 Division of the Veda, in the last Dwáparaage, by the Vyása Krishńa
Dwaipáyana. Paila made reader of the Rich;Vaiśampáyana of the Yajush; Jaimini
of the Shun; and Sumantu of the Atharvan.Súta appointed to teach the historical
poems. Origin of the four parts of theVeda. Sanhitás of the Rig-veda. (Vishnu
puranam Book3 chap4)
4 Yaj, 'toworship.' Meaning; { vide the difference between ONE UNITED
“YUJ| and THE WORD “YAJ” TO WORSHIP; If people ignorant were to mix
ormisinterpret the words YUJ one vedam, and then the word |PRAISE RIC,RIK,
RICHASinto RIG and then to WORSHIP BY A SYSTEM OF YAGNAM YAGAM HOMAM ETC AS
“yaj”, IT’SA MISERABLE CONDTIONS OF THE DEVILS IN PARADISE.
5 Then the Veda Vyasa, having collected togetherthe hymns called Richas,
compiled the Rigveda; with the prayers and directionstermed Yajushas he formed
the Yajur-veda; with those called Sáma, Sáma-veda;and with the Atharvas he
composed the rules of all the ceremonies suited tokings, and the function of
the Brahman agreeably to practice {VAYUPURANAM} [.The derivation of the Váyu
Puráńa, is from Yuj, 'to join,' 'toemploy;' the formulæ being those especially
applied to sacrificial rites, orset apart for that purpose from the general
collection: p. 277 Passagesfrom the Váyu, reads it, confining the derivation
to Yaj, 'to worship.' Theconcluding passage, relating to the Atharvan, refers,
in regard to regalceremonies, to those of expiation, Śánti, &c.
6 Adhwaryu to recitethe prayers (Yajush)(or direct the ceremony); of the
Hotri, to repeat the hymns (Richas); of the Udgátri, to chaunt other hymns
(Sáma); and of the Brahman, to pronouncethe formulæ called Atharva.Four types
of purohits.
7 Sama (सम,“even”) refers to one of the ten good qualities (guṇa) of a
song (gīta).Rig Veda 1.7.1 Sukta 7 इन्द्र॒मिद्गा॒थिनो॑
बृ॒हदिन्द्र॑म॒र्केभि॑र॒र्किण॑: । इन्द्रं॒ वाणी॑रनूषत ॥ इन्द्रमिद्गाथिनो
बृहदिन्द्रमर्केभिरर्किणः । इन्द्रं वाणीरनूषत ॥ indram id gāthino bṛhadindram
arkebhir arkiṇaḥ | indraṃ vāṇīr anūṣata ||
“The chanters (of the Soma) extol Indra with songs, the reciters of the Ṛkwith
prayers, the priests of the Yajuṣ, with texts.”
Sāyaṇa: Ṛgveda-bhāṣya
Gāthina = singers; gīyamānasāma-yuktā udgātāraḥ, the udgatās with sāmas to be
chanted;
Bṛhat = bṛhatā, songs, with the bṛhat-sāma; arkinaḥ arkebhiḥ = those ofthe
Ṛgveda, with hymns;
Arka = mantra, prayer;
Vāṇīḥ = vāṇībhiḥ, with texts or words(a reference, perhaps either to the
singers or the reciters of the prayers,perhaps to the texts of the yajus.
In many texts it is SOMA AND NOT SAMA NAD THE MUSIC IS THEPRIME PART OF QUIET
PRAYERS.
8 Let the Bragginglearn better and come out of the well. The scriptures had
aligned the YUJ to Rik @ Richa to YAJ to Soma @ SAMA andAtharva. One brahmam
many roopams; Onevedam and the 3 +1 =4 different purposeful Vedams, where the
Rics flowed the inpraise of the GODs were adopted in other YAJ and SOMA and the
Atharvan, Nirukta,Mahabharata anumarana parva etc KR IRS 101221
On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 at 08:50, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:
Respected sir,
There is no wonder the all knowing Mr Rajaram, Calling Me- R,Gopalakrishnan
as ignorent and claim to be IRS write From Rig veda instead of from Yajur veda.
You are not able to co-relate between Rig Vedam and Yajur Vedam. For him all
Vedas are same, though the ALL KNOWING Mr Rajaram will write in another
occasion the different vedas appeared in different periods.
A person not able to write a paragraph correctly without spelling mistakes,
not knowing to place verb and noun properly says me as ignorant. Sir, I
recollect the saying- Vattikku Vai adhimam ennu muram paranju.He is that
winnow.
He has got the skin of rhinoceros. Even after instruction from moderator,
still responding to each and every posting by me. But not having the
capacity of posting any thing of his own in the group.It is shame after bidding
farewell to group, making a response next day in the group.
Gopalakrishnan
On Friday, 10 December, 2021, 06:48:50 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer
<[email protected]> wrote:
Dear folks
When a total ignoramus nonentity claims to be Yajur veda, but is not aware of,
much able to read or understand, extracts from Yajur vedam regarding parjanya,
but publishes a pidgin-English rendition of his own butchered extract on
parjanya from rig-vedam, his faithful Yappanese lap-puppy happily yaps that an
extract from the saundarya lahari of Sree Aadi Shankaraacharya quoted by his
super-farter lord and master is "an adorable verse which is part of Vedas!"
A fit bootlicker to one who is not aware that our Yajur vedam says
"omityekaaksharam brahma" and "omithi brahma"?
Meaning that, as our upanishads also say, there is only one God, named Brahmam
and Praanam (breath, or life), from Whom originated our amalgamated prime vedam
as the only one and true Word of God, and which humans subdivided into r'g,
yajur, and saama for convenience of learning, teaching, and dissemination in
secrecy to selected pupils in paata shaala sunder proper supervision and
safeguards.
S Narayanaswamy Iyer
On 9 Dec 2021, at 7:03 PM, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote:
welcome KR
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021 at 15:10, APS Mani <[email protected]> wrote:
What an adorable verse which is part of Vedas!
Mani
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 2:43 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:
Pranam
Soundarya lahari2
18. Tanuschayaabhisthetaruna taruni Shrisarinibhih Divam
sarvaamurvimaruna nimagnaam smaranthi yah,Bhavanthasya trasyadvana
harinashaalee nayanah Sahorvashya vashyaah katikati nageervana ganikah/
Bhagavati! Udyadbhaanu Sahasraabhaa Chaturbaahu Samanvitaa,Raaga Swarupa
pashaadhyaa Krodha Kaaraankushojjwalaa/ Manorupekshu KodandaPancha Tanmatra
Saayakaa, Nijaaruna Prabhaapura majjadbrahmaanda mandalaa/
You are of Ushahkaala Bhaskara ‘s magnificentglory and of ‗Arunima ‘, the
splendour and grandeur of his golden rays. This irresistiblereaction draws
close attention not only of the mortals of Earth but ofdyuloka/swarga Lokas
like Devas and Devis, especially of Apsaras likeGhritachi, Menaka, Rambha,
Purvachitti, Swayamprabha and Urvashi thousands ofwhom possessed of eyes like
lotus leaves, who were employed in enticing thehearts of persons practising
rigid austerities with their dances as they possessslim waists, shaking their
bosoms , casting their glances around, and stealingthe hearts, austerities and
minds of even renowned Maharshis to turn them to beslaves!
[Rig Veda is quoted about the glory of USHA DEVI: Sukta 75-81: Sukta75:
Stanzas :5752-5759 or 1-8:
Vyushaa aavo divijaa ritenaavishkrunvaanaamahimaanmaagaat, apa druhastam
aavarajushtamangirastamaa patyaa ajeegah/
Mahe no adya suvitaaya bodhyusho mahesoubhaagaaya pra yandhi, chitram rayim
yashasam dhehyasme devi marteshumaanushi shrasthum/
Etetyebhaanavo darshayaashchitraa ushase amritaasa aaguh, janayanto
daivyaani ushasoamritaasa aaguh, janayanto daivyaani vrataanyaaprananto
antarikshaa vyavasthuh/
Eshaa syaa yujaanaa paraakaatpancha khiteehpari sadyo jigaati,
abhipashyanti vayunaa janaanaam divo duhitaa bhuvanasyapatni/
VaajineevateeSuryasya yoshaa chitraamaghaa raaya sho vasunaam,
Rishishtataa jarayantiimaghonushaa ucchati vahnibhirgunaanaa/
Pratidyutaanaamarushaaso ashvaaschitraa adushrun -nushasam vahantah,
yaati shubhraavishvapishaa rathena dadhaati ratnam vidhate janaaya/
Satyaasatyebhirmahati mahadbhir devi devobhiryajataa yajatraih, rajad
drullhaanidadadustriyaanaam pratigaava ushasam vaavashanta/
Nu no gomadviravardhehi ratnamusho ashwaavatpuruubhojo asme, maa no barhih
purushataa idekaryuyam paat swastibhih sadaa nah/
(Devi Usha onbeing visualised on the ‗Antariksha ‘after her arrival, her
illuminationstarted spreading in all directions and the evil forces and foes
gotdisappeared along with the darkness. Devi! your arrival heralds joy and
peaceas content is written large on the visages of the commoners, especially
astheir food gets ready with men, women and children. Your golden rays are
wonderful,peculiar, and everlasting and they usher in divinity in the
initiation ofvratas, yagna karyas, and devotional works like singing, group
performances andawakening of temples dotted all over on the earth even while
reverberating Antarikshatoo. Indeed Devi Usha is the ‗annavati‘ or the empress
of food and prosperity;she is praised by Rishis way of comparing days and
nights and worship her every‗ushah kaala‘ by extolling her with vedic hymns,
group singing and of coursewith the invocations to Devas about her outstanding
worthiness; thus thecommoners realise that Devi Usha has ushered in on the sky
and risen from the oceans.As the distinguished ‗saptaashwas‘ on the antariksha
are visualisable the few lucky humans ofintrospection and faith and those
fortunate ones are stated to be blessed withluck in some form or the other in
the course of that very day! This is thereason why cows await ‗Ushahkaala‘daily
as these are greatly fond of thatprecise time! Usha Devi! We beseech you to
grant us hordes of cows, horses andof course excellent progeny and prosperity;
may we never forsake dharma andnyaya and do protect the means of sustaining the
concerned works of virtueforever!)
Sukta 76:Stnzas 5760-66 or 1-7: Udu jyotiramritam vishvajanyam
vishvaanarah Savitaa Devoashret,kratwaa Devaanaamajanishtha chakshuraavirakar
bhuvanam vishwamushaah/
Pra me panthaaDeva yaanaa adrushyatramardhanto vasubhirishkritaasah, abhrud
keturupashasahpurastaat prateechya -agaadadhi hamyerbhyah/
Taneedahaanibahulaanyaasanya praacheenamuditaa Suryasya, yatah pari
jaarayivaacharatyanutyusho dadrakshe napunaryateeva/
Na iddevaanamsadhamaad aasanurutaa vaanah kavayah puryaasah, Guulham jyotih
pitaroanvavidantyamantraa ajanayatrushaasam/
Samaaaurve adhisangataasah sam jaanete na yante mithaste,te devaanaam na
minanti vrataanyamardhantop vasubhiryaadamaanaah/
Pati tvaastomaireelate vashisthah ushabudhah subhago tushtu vaamsah,
gavaam netri vaajapatnee na uccheshah sujaato prathamaa jaraswa/
Eshaa netriraadhasah suunrutaanaamusha ucchanti ribhyate vashistaih,
deerghashrutamrayimasme dadhaanaa yuyam paat swastibhih sadaa nah//
(The SupremeGuide to the Universe Savitha Deva renders eternal brightness
in favour of allthe Beings even as He facilitates Devas to perform their
respective duties toowhile Devi Usha fills up with illumination to ‗tri
bhuvanas‘. On analysing thestability of the rosy path of Light with no
hindrance and difficulty to theBeings, Devi Usha‘s brilliant ‗dwaja‘ or the
banner arrives flying as carried by horses in theeast descending from the upper
worlds. Usha Devi! While heralding Surya‘s fullfledged arrival, you provide
service to Him with obedience but not as anindependent Authority. In the days
of distant yore, ‗Angiragana‘weresatyavraas, famed poets, and ‗siddhas‘or
celestial miracles and enabled Devatasto enjoy ‗soma paana‘ while Devi Usha
manifested on her own by the virtue of‗mantra bala‘ or the power of mantras.
Rishis, the sacred cows and yagjna andsuch purificatory karyas appeared to
convene for respecting each other underthe auspices of Devi Usha, and that is
how mastered the techniques of‗dhana-ishwarya prapti‘. The most auspicious Usha
Devi! Vasishthaadi Maharshispray and worship you at the Ushah kaala! You are
the high benefactor and safeguarder of cows and food secources. Bless us Devi
to save us from darklness andbestow glory and best wishes to all.)
Sukta 77: Stanzas5767-5772 or 1-6: Upo ruruche yuvatirna yoshaa Vishwam
jeevam prasuvanticharaayai, abhuudagnih samidhe maanushaanaamakar jyotir
aadhamaanaa tamaamsi/
Vishwampratichi supradhaa udasthaadrushadvaaso bibhrati shukramashvait,
Hiranyavarnaasudrushhekasandruggvaam mataa netryahnaamarochi/
Devaanaamchakshuh subhagaa vahanti shwetam nayanti sadrusheekam ashwam,
Ushaa adarshirashmabhirvyaktaa chitraamaghaa vishwamanu prabhutaa/
Antivaamaa duure amitramucchervigavyutimabhayam krudheenah, yaavaya dwesha
aa bharaa vasuni chodaya raadhogunate madini/
Asmeshreshthebhir bhaanubhirvi bhaahyusho Devi prtirantee na yaayuh,
ishamchanodadhati vishwavaare gomad ashvaavadrathavaccha raadhah/Yaam
twaadivoduhitarvardhayantyushahsujaate matibhirvassishthaah,saamaasu dhaa
rayimrisvam brihantam yuyam patswastibhih sadaanah/
(Usha Devi like a young and accomplished wife of Surya Deva acquiresand
even masters the techniques of her Lord and the Agni Deva present at thattime
is as a happy witness. The lady of high repute Devi Usha gets visualisedwith
extraordinary radiance with crystal clear and sparkling white robes
andauthority.
Devaanaam chakshuhsubhagaa vahanti swetam nayati-/ She looks like the ‗netra
jyoti‘ or the radiant cynosure andthe personification of auspiciousness,
opulence, and immaculate robes ofwhiteness approaching the worlds. Devi! The
translucent one as you are is freefrom evil energies and so be the expansion of
‗go-sampatti‘, besides horses, chariots and wealth.
Devi! Yorare the darling daughter of dyuloka, ever praisedby Maharshis
like Vasishtha;do kindly administer us with virtue and happiness.)
Sukta 78: Stanzas 5773-5777 or 1-5: Prati ketavah
prathamaaadrushyannurthwaa asyaa anjayo vi shrayante, Usho avaarchaa brihataa
rathenajyotishmataa vaamamasyabhyam vakshi/
Pratisheemaragnirjarate smruddhih prati vipraaso matibhirgrunaantah, Ushaa
yaatijyotishaa baadhamaanaa vishwaa tamaamsi duridaapa devi/
Yetaa vu tyaahpratyadrushran purastaajjyotir yacchanteerushaso vibhaateeh,
ajeejanantsuryahyagjnamagnimapaacheenam tamo agaadajushtam/
Acheti divoduhitaa madhoni vihve pashyantyushasam vibhaateeh, aasthaadrayam
svadhayaayujjamaanamaa yama - shwaasah sujujo vahanti/
Prati twaadyasumanaso budhantaasmaakaaso Maghavaanovayam cha,
tilvi[1]laalayadhvamushasovibhaateeryuyam pat swastibhih sadaa nah/
(Devi Usha‘sinitial group of kiranas are being seen as also the quick
spread of brilliance;the ones as seen just above them too are accompanying too;
Usha Devi! Do comefast along with lot of riches for us by the luminous chariot.
Normally at theUsha kaala, Agni Deva by the help of ‗samidhaas‘ is available
and the Jnaanisalong with eulogies worship and the Celestial Divinities tend to
respondforward and simultaneously Devi Usha lessens gradually the intensity
ofdarkness, ignorance and of sins. In fact, even initial rays of
brightnessherald the darshan of Usha Devi and soon subsequently, both Surya
Deva and AgniDeva along with Yagjna Deva become ready even as the hateful
darkness getscleared instantly. Devi! You are the 56 renowned daughter of
Dyuloka and thevision of the much awaited Usha Devi as the harbinger of the Sun
God! Indeed,may your auspicious appearance on the horizons as readily
recognised by theintelligent and knowledge circles be blessed with all round
success of the dayahead and to follow too.)
Sukta 79: stanzas 5778-81or 1-4: Vyushaa aavah pathyaajanaanaam pancha
kshiteermaanushir bodhayantee,susundrugbharuukshibhirbhi bhaarnumashredvid
Suryo rodasi chakshusaavah/
Vyanjate divoanteshwaktuunvisho na yuktaa Ushaso yatante, sam te gaavastama
aa vartayantijyoriryacchanti Saviteva baahuu/
Abhudushaa Indratamaa madhonyajeejananatsuvitaaya shravaamsi, vi divo Devi
duhitaa dadhaatyan- girastamaa sukrutevasuni/
Taavadusheraadho asmabhyam raaswa yaavato struobhyo arado gunaanaa, yaam
twaajajurvrishabhyasyaa ravena vi drullahasya duro adrerournoh/
(Devi Usha the ever helpful one to humanbeings smashes the darkness and
serves all on earth with her outstandingradiance all the classes and wakes them
up and Surya Deva too no sooner thanthat occupies the entirety of earth. Then
the antariksha too gets filled upwith the magnificence of Surya Deva soon
thereafter. While the Devi who blessesthe Beings with food resources, she then
as the daughter od dyuloka makes wayahead there and blesses dyuloka vaasis
ofwhat all opulence could do to themowing to their excellence in Celestial
deeds. On hearing the PravriddhvaVrishabha Stotra and Rava or Shabda, you are
instantly happy and untie humanbeings instantly from their difficulties.)]
Courtesy Kanchi Mutt KR IRS 91221
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZop_U8PrZBA%3DJt_bJc1d1Zxpr8w0r_kVgb2q2dpYO6Z8yA%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAOCR2sqSy4apEw08H5Z%2B1nbEHrTSE4Zu%2BQYrUNrQ8Jz-Yb5SCw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZooQ7FWqzKUaB1XypYUVJK_UjJqFROcnLfUccQRZ_HeKTw%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/6CC88802-A87D-49C7-B8E0-83014B52C103%40gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/248A04D0-8E44-4197-B157-089E80E7F671%40gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1904050550.551950.1639150397844%40mail.yahoo.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZoqC0f4OujW_sRyo7OjRyOt7CZNZtEx-ZuDuSVQgA%2B1auQ%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL5XZoqqY%3DMNyxC%2BqPYCwNn5MwbK6j%3Dh3s6G-fQTzj8RtM_4tg%40mail.gmail.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/845226867.769492.1639294415995%40mail.yahoo.com.
