Pranam
In Q6 & 7, what evolution got to do with the cow and later animal tasting
Good (beef?) . In that same rhythm of evolution, why did not the flesh of
humans be also discussed as a cannibal?. There is a saying, A STONE IS GOD
TO SOME AND A MERE STONE TO MANY AND IT'S IN THE PERCEPTION. fOR A NON
VEGETARIAN, ALL ARE SIMILAR TASTE AND THERE IS NO REGARD TO LIFE. The
theory of evolution of Darwin is a story connected by facts of the visible
current spectrum. The fact perceived now , may not be the similar fact or
the SAME FACT, as then,was, since ,the basis of computation is brain made.
The west said all from the amoeba, started the mutations and changed one
from another in 13billion years where life started only in lakhs years; had
so many species emanated within these span of years, one from the other,
all those theories were narrated by only conjectures. Had the earlier
changes been true as per Darwin, why in the known historical printable
periods , there was no or even one evolution at all?. If the DNA yields the
same pattern of the species now, then how the DNAs then gave vent to a
different specie pr where the DNAs have two species connectivity, in the
future, why the old specie at least ,once were not reborn again, Had the
creationism were so simple as predicted by the Darwinism, why even the
existing species were not reproduced in the quantity to test?.
Darwinian falls down heer. Darwin after the death of his beloved
daughter, became a non believer and said that perhaps his comprehension of
the production of species may not be correct also. But the west developed
it as they thought that God is no more. On the contrary evolution and the
involutions were defined reasonably logical, by the vedic science.
" That chief principle (Pradhāna), which is the indiscrete cause, is
called by the sages also Prakriti
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/prakriti#purana> (nature): it is
subtile, uniform, and comprehends what is and what is not (or both causes
and effects); is durable, self-sustained, illimitable, undecaying, and
stable; devoid of sound or touch, and possessing neither colour nor form;
endowed with the three qualities (in equilibrium); the mother of the world;
without beginning; and that into which all that is produced is resolved[14]
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/vishnu-purana-wilson/d/doc115937.html#note-e-58558>.
By that principle all things were invested in the period subsequent to the
last dissolution of the universe, and prior to creation[15]
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/vishnu-purana-wilson/d/doc115937.html#note-e-58559>
.
[14]
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/vishnu-purana-wilson/d/doc115937.html#note-t-58558>:The
attributes of Pradhāna, the chief (principle or element), here specified,
conform generally to those ascribed to it by the Sāṅkhya philosophy
(Sāṅkhya Kārikā, p. 16, &c.), although some of them are incompatible with
its origin from a first cause. In the Sāṅkhya this incongruity does not
occur; for there Pradhāna is independent, and coordinate with primary
spirit. The Purāṇas give rise to the inconsistency by a lax use of both
philosophical and pantheistical expressions. The most incongruous epithets
in our text are however explained away in the comment. Thus nitya,
‘eternal,’ is said to mean ‘uniform, not liable to increase or diminution:’
Sadasadātmaka, ‘comprehending what is and what is not,’ means ‘having the
power of both cause and effect’, as proceeding from Viṣṇu, and as giving
origin to material things. Anādi, ‘without beginning,’ means ‘without
birth’, not being engendered by any created thing, but proceeding
immediately from the first cause. ‘The mother,’ or literally the womb of
the world', means the passive agent in creation,' operated on or influenced
by the active will of the Creator. The first part of the passage in the
text is a favourite one with several of. the Purāṇas, but they modify it
and apply it after their own fashion. In the Viṣṇu the original is ###,
rendered as above. The Vāyu, Brahmānda, and p. 11 Kūrmma Purāṇas have ‘The
indiscrete cause, which is uniform, and both cause and effect, and whom
those who are acquainted with first principles call Pradhāna and
Prakriti—is the uncognizable Brahma, who was before all.’ But the
application of two synonymes of Prakriti to Brahma seems unnecessary at
least. The Brahmā P. corrects the reading apparently: the first line is as
before; the second is, ###. The passage is placed absolutely; ‘There was an
indiscrete cause eternal, and cause and effect, which was both matter and
spirit (Pradhāna and Puruṣa), from which this world was made. Instead of
’such' or this,' some copies read ‘from which Īśvara or god (the active
deity or Brahmā) made the world.’ The Hari Vaṃśa has the same reading,
except in the last term, which it makes ### that is, according to the
commentator, the world, which is Īśvara, was made.' The same authority
explains this indiscrete cause, avyakta kārana, to denote Brahmā, the
creator an identification very unusual, if not inaccurate, and possibly
founded on misapprehension of what is stated by the Bhaviṣya P.: ‘That male
or spirit which is endowed with that which is the indiscrete cause, &c. is
known in the world as Brahmā: he being in the egg, &c.’ The passage is
precisely the same in Manu, I, 11; except that we have ‘visṛṣta’ instead of
‘viśiṣṭha:’ the latter is a questionable reading, and is probably wrong:
the sense of the latter is, detached; and the whole means very
consistently, ‘embodied spirit detached from the indiscrete cause of the
world is known as Brahmā.’ The Padma P. inserts the first line, ### &c.,
but has ‘Which creates undoubtedly Mahat and the other qualities’ assigning
the first epithets, therefore, as the Viṣṇu does, to Prakriti only. The
Liṅga also refers the expression to Prakriti alone, but makes it a
secondary cause: ‘An indiscrete cause, which those acquainted with first
principles call Pradhāna and Prakriti, proceeded from that Īśvara (Śiva).’
This passage is one of very many instances in which expressions are common
to several Purāṇas that seem to be borrowed from one another, or from some
common source older than any of them, especially in this instance, as the
same text occurs in Manu.
[15]
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/vishnu-purana-wilson/d/doc115937.html#note-t-58559>:The
expression of the text is rather obscure; ‘All was pervaded (or
comprehended) by that chief principle before (recreation), after the (last)
destruction.’ The ellipses are filled up by the commentator. This, he adds,
is to be regarded as the state of things at a Mahā Pralaya, or total
dissolution; leaving, therefore, crude matter, nature, or chaos, as a
coexistent element with the Supreme. This, which is conformable to the
philosophical doctrine, is not however that of the Purāṇas in general,
nor p. 12 that of our text, which states (b. VI. c. 4), that at a Prākrita,
or elementary dissolution, Pradhāna itself merges into the deity. Neither
is it apparently the doctrine of the Vedas, although their language is
somewhat equivocal.
For Brahmans
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/brahman#purana> learned in the Vedas
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/vedas#hinduism>, and teaching truly
their doctrines, explain such passages as the following as intending the
production of the chief principle (Pradhāna). “There was neither day nor
night, nor sky nor earth, nor darkness nor light, nor any other thing, save
only One, inapprehensible by intellect, or That which is Brahma and Pumān
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/puman#purana> (spirit) and Pradhāna
(matter) ” The two forms which are other than the essence of unmodified
Viṣṇu, are Pradhāna (matter) and Puruṣa (spirit); and his other form, by
which those two are connected or separated, is called Kāla (time) . When a
discrete substance is aggregated in crude nature, as in a foregone
dissolution, that dissolution is termed elemental (Prākrita). The deity as
Time is without beginning, and his end is not known; and from him the
revolutions of creation, continuance, and dissolution intermittently
succeed: for when, in the latter season, the equilibrium of the qualities
(Pradhāna) exists, and spirit (Pumān) is detached from matter, then the
form of Viṣṇu which is Time abides. Then the supreme Brahma, the supreme
soul, the substance of the world, the lord of all creatures, the universal
soul, the supreme ruler, Hari, of his own will having entered into matter
and spirit, agitated the mutable and immutable principles, the season of
creation being arrived, in the same manner as fragrance affects the mind
from its proximity merely, and not from any immediate operation upon mind
itself: so the Supreme influenced the elements of creation. Puruṣottama is
both the agitator and the thing to be agitated; being present in the
essence of matter, both when it is contracted and expanded.
Then from that equilibrium of the qualities (Pradhāna), presided
over by the soul , proceeds the unequal development of those qualities
(constituting the principle Mahat or Intellect) at the time of creation.
The Chief principle then invests that Great principle, Intellect, and it
becomes threefold, as affected by the quality of goodness, foulness, or
darkness, and invested by the Chief principle (matter) as seed is by its
skin. From the Great principle (Mahat) Intellect, threefold Egotism,
(Ahaṅkāra, denominated Vaikarīka, ‘pure;’ Taijasa
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/taijasa#purana>, ‘passionate;’ and
Bhūtādi, ‘rudimental, is produced; the origin of the (subtile) elements,
and of the organs of sense; invested, in consequence of its three
qualities, by Intellect, as Intellect is by the Chief principle. Elementary
Egotism then becomes productive, as the rudiment of sound, produced from it
Ether, of which sound is the characteristic, investing it with its rudiment
of sound. Ether becoming productive, engendered the rudiment of touch;
whence originated strong wind, the property of which is touch; and Ether,
with the rudiment of sound, enveloped the rudiment of touch. Then wind
becoming productive, produced the rudiment of form (colour); whence light
(or fire) proceeded, of which, form (colour) is the attribute; and the
rudiment of touch enveloped the wind with the rudiment of colour. Light
becoming productive, produced the rudiment of taste; whence proceed all
juices in which flavour resides; and the rudiment of colour invested the
juices with the rudiment of taste. The waters becoming productive,
engendered the rudiment of smell; whence an aggregate (earth) originates,
of which smell is the property. In each several elements resides its
peculiar rudiment; thence the property of tanmātratā, (type or rudiment) is
ascribed to these elements. Rudimental elements are not endowed with
qualities, and therefore they are neither soothing, nor terrific, nor
stupefying. This is the elemental creation, proceeding from the principle
of egotism affected by the property of darkness. The organs of sense are
said to be the passionate products of the same principle, affected by
foulness; and the ten divinitie proceed from egotism affected by the
principle of goodness; as does Mind, which is the eleventh. The organs of
sense are ten: of the ten, five are the skin, eye, nose, tongue, and ear;
the object of which, combined with Intellect, is the apprehension of sound
and the rest: the organs of excretion and procreation, the hands, the feet,
and the voice, form the other five; of which excretion, generation,
manipulation, motion, and speaking, are the several acts.
Then, ether, air, light, water, and earth, severally united with the
properties of sound and the rest, existed as distinguishable according to
their qualities, as soothing, terrific, or stupefying; but possessing
various energies, and being unconnected, they could not, without
combination, create living beings, not having blended with each other.
Having combined, therefore, with one another, they assumed, through their
mutual association, the character of one mass of entire unity; and from the
direction of spirit, with the acquiescence of the indiscrete Principle,
Intellect and the rest, to the gross elements inclusive, formed an egg ,
which gradually expanded like a bubble of water. This vast egg, O sage,
compounded of the elements, and resting on the waters, was the excellent
natural abode of Viṣṇu in the form of Brahmā; and there Viṣṇu, the lord of
the universe, whose essence is inscrutable, assumed a perceptible form, and
even he himself abided in it in the character of Brahmā. Its womb, vast as
the mountain Meru <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/meru#purana>, was
composed of the mountains; and the mighty oceans were the waters that
filled its cavity. In that egg, O Brahman
<https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/brahman#purana>, were the continents
and seas and mountains, the planets and divisions of the universe, the
gods, the demons, and mankind. And this egg was externally invested by
seven natural envelopes, or by water, air, fire, ether, and Ahaṅkāra the
origin of the elements, each tenfold the extent of that which it invested;
next came the principle of Intelligence; and, finally, the whole was
surrounded by the indiscrete Principle: resembling thus the cocoa-nut,
filled interiorly with pulp, and exteriorly covered by husk and rind.
COW as DHARMA: वर्क्षे-वर्क्षे नियता मीमयद गौस्ततो वयः पर
पतान्पुरुषादः
| अथेदं विश्वं भुवनं भयात इद्रायसुन्वद रषये च शिक्षत || RV 10 27
22 vṛkṣe-vṛkṣe
niyatā mīmayad ghaustato vayaḥ pra patānpuruṣādaḥ | athedaṃ viśvaṃ
bhuvanaṃ bhayāta idrāyasunvad ṛṣaye ca śikṣat ||देवानां माने परथमा अतिष्ठन
कर्न्तत्रदेषमुपर उदायन |
तरयस्तपन्ति पर्थिविमनूप दव बर्बूकं वहतःपुरीषम || सा ते जीवातुरुत तस्य
विद्धि म समैताद्र्गप गूहःसमर्ये | अविः सवः कर्णुते गूहते बुसं स
पादुरस्यनिर्णिजो न मुच्यते || devānāṃ māne prathamā atiṣṭhan
kṛntatradeṣamupara udāyan | trayastapanti pṛthivimanūpa dva bṛbūkaṃ
vahataḥpurīṣam || sā te jīvāturuta tasya viddhi ma smaitādṛghapa
ghūhaḥsamarye |
aviḥ svaḥ kṛṇute ghūhate busaṃ sa pādurasyanirṇijo na mucyate || Rig
vedam opens up with the manifestations of life and the cow along with each
tree viz all exposed simultaneously so that in the 24the verse it is
stamped as sā te jīvāturuta tasya viddhi THIS IS YOUR LIFE DESTINED.
gAUSTATO VAYA IN verse 22 RENDERS THE FORMATION OF THE COW. Hence Cow is
ordained as the symbol of dharma whois 4 legs are described as the chatur
yuga. And this man in quora thinks everything only as a flesh. KR IRS
171221
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 07:24, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
[email protected]> wrote:
> *CULTURAL QA 12-2021-17*
>
> *BEING A COMPILATION THERE MAY BE ERRORS*
>
> *Q1 Is Ganga a sister of Parvati?*
>
> A1 Divyansh Saxena Dec 1
>
> Yes. First, Goddess Ganga took birth. Her Parents were King Himavan (also
> known as Himavat or Himraj) and Queen Menawati. Then Goddess Maa Shakti
> (also known Adi Shakti or Adi Parashakti) took birth as Goddess Parvati, so
> he became the younger daughter of King Himavat and Queen Menawati. *That
> means Maa Ganga is the elder sister of Maa Parvati.*
>
> Goddess Ganga (Goddess of purity). She is a river Goddess.
>
> Q2 How was plastic invented by mistake?
>
> A2 Steven Haddock Studied at York University (Canada)Dec 8
>
> *Well, it should be “How was one of the first important plastics
> accidentally invented. Twice”.*
>
> The plastic in this case is Polyvinyl Chloride, which is still in
> widespread use. It’s the third most manufactured plastic on the planet.
>
> We start in 1838 with Henri Victor Regnault. Among his other
> accomplishments, he worked with chlorinated hydrocarbons, *taking a
> chance on combining chlorine with organic compounds.*
>
> *One of these was vinyl chloride. One day, he prepared a solution of it
> and then left it alone for a few weeks in the sun. It had solidified in the
> meantime.* He made a note of it but never published his work on it or
> patented it.
>
> But in 1872, a German chemist named Eugen Baumann also had a solution of
> vinyl chloride that he left out in the sun with the same results. However,
> not finding a patent for it, he took one out.
>
> *This magnificent discovery of artificial long chain molecules then, of
> course, revolutionized everything!*
>
> Oh who am I kidding. *The development was ignored for another thirty
> years*. Then a couple of chemists working for the German chemical company
> Griesheim-Elektron made the *giant breakthrough that made PVC what it is
> today.*
>
> No, sorry, they didn’t. They found the stuff too rigid, brittle and hard
> to work with. They couldn’t come up with any commercial applications either.
>
> Finally, in 1926, 88 years after the compound was synthesized and 54 years
> after it was patented, a chemist at *B.F. Goodrich named Waldo Semon
> found that if he mixed PVC with other chemicals it became workable and
> could be commercially processed.*
>
> *Q3 Do zoos give special food to flamingos to keep them pink?*
>
> A3 About Wild Animals Patrick Colligan Nov 29
>
> *Yes. They are fed a powdery substance called Flamingo Mix.* The
> Flamingos dip their beaks into the powder. Then, place their beaks into the
> water and shake them from side to side. *Flamingos are filter feeders.
> They strain their food. Their pink color comes from beta carotene*, a
> pigment found in the algae and brine shrimp, that compose their natural
> diet.
>
> *Q4 Have we learned everything about the human body? If not,
> how much do we really know?*
>
> A4 Ken Saladin Former professor of histology (microscopic
> anatomy)Wed
>
> I learn several new things every year. Even though I “wrote the book on
> it,” so to speak, I update it every 3 to 4 years with what I’ve learned new
> since the last time I revised it. So do all the other anatomy authors I
> compete with. If I didn’t, I’d fall behind the science and lose readers, my
> market share.
>
> I’m starting the 7th edition of that book now, and just finishing up the
> 10th edition of the one below. Updated answer keys to the chapter review
> questions today.
>
> *This is how I make my living—keeping up with stuff* scientists learn
> about the human body that we didn’t know last week, last month, last year.
>
> Q5 What are some amazing facts about the Indian Railways?
>
> A5 Atharva Dave Lives in Mumbai, Maharashtra, IndiaUpdated 1y
>
> 1.The resonance frequency of the suspension for the coaches is kept as
> close as possible to 72 bpm or 1.2 Hz while designing which is optimal for
> sleep and relaxation.
>
> 2.The diamond crossing (dubbed so by railways themselves), in Nagpur, is
> one-of-its-kind, from where trains go East, West, North and South.
>
> 3.The Indian Railways is the 8th largest employer in the world with 14
> lakh employees.
>
> 4.The IRCTC website is the second most visited website in India.
>
> 5.The under-construction Chenab railway bridge, in Reasi district, J&K, is
> expected to be one of the highest rail bridges in the world, when completed.
>
> *My note- It is inaugurated and trains are running* over the bridge now
>
> 6.The famed Darjeeling "toy train," which is still running on its
> indigenous steam engine, was built by India's British colonial master in
> 1881.
>
> 7.The track length of Indian Railways can circle the equator one and a
> half times.
>
> *8.Shrirampur and Belapur are two different stations in Maharashtra's
> Ahmednagar district, at the same* location on the railway route but on
> opposite sides of the track.
>
> 9.Indian Railways runs as many as 19,000 trains every day. Some 12,000
> trains are for passengers and 7,000 for freight.
>
> 10. The railway station of Navapur is built in 2 states; one half of it is
> in Maharashtra and the other half is in Gujarat.
>
> *And another station named Bhawani Mandi is also divided into two states
> Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh.*
>
> 11.Indian Railways did not have a toilet for 50 years until one passenger
> wrote an angry letter to Indian Railways.
>
> *My note- It is a repeated QA for refreshing.*
>
> *Q6 How did cows evolve? How did they not get eaten to
> extinction by predators? They look like big, stupid, slow animals.*
>
> A6 Stephen Merkel Former Ballistic Engineer (2011–2013)Updated
> 3y
>
> *This is a cow: People bred these to be easy to* control and smaller than
> their wild counterparts, basically just lambs to the slaughter… or cattle.
> (sorry, I know I know)
>
> *This is an Aurochs:These were massive creatures, who were intelligent,
> and so fierce, that humans* were unable to tame them. Humans managed to
> breed some of them down into smaller, *less intelligent animals that we
> could farm effectively, but *their ancestors were formidable, and fought
> off predators by having the largest bulls protect the herd, and the
> weakest calves were protected in the center of the herd. Unfortunately,
> they were hunted to their extinction in the wild, and only survive today
> in the form of modern domestic cattle. Some people are attempting to
> genetically resurrect the larger, more intelligent wild Aurochs, from
> domesticated stock, but the process is slow going. So far, they have
> managed to breed much of the size back in:
>
> But the survival instincts are not quite there in the calves they have
> bred as of yet.
>
> For a better explanation of how this……could be a valid evolutionary
> survival strategy, see my answer here:
>
> *Q7 Why do animals taste good? If evolution is about surviving
> and reproducing in the best possible way, why not make predators not want
> to eat you?*
>
> A7 Stephen Merkel, I enjoy eating, and experiment in the
> kitchenUpdated Mar 7, 2019 , trained chef with a borderline obsessive
> interest in food history and science
>
> This is a dodo bird:
>
> Not much of a looker, is he? Well, the dodo has one thing going for him,
> his meat tastes absolutely horrible. It is stringy, and not palatable in
> the least... Or so said *the sailors who were forced to survive on dodo
> meat while on the island of Mauritius.*
>
> They still ate the birds in droves, but what truly did them in was the
> pigs and rats that got loose on the island, which ate their eggs from the
> nest. (They laid their eggs, one per bird, on the ground, as they didn’t
> have any natural predators on the island) They went extinct sometime in the
> 1660’s.
>
> *Perhaps they could have been saved, and survive to this day. If the
> sailors found them tasty, it might have made them put in the effort to
> capture some,* and farm them. If these sailors turned farmers were
> raising dodos as a food source, and discovered pigs or rats eating the
> eggs, they would most decidedly take efforts to stop their livestock from
> being killed, and would have ensured a captive population survived.
>
> *In fact, some species are completely extinct in the wild, and only raised
> in captivity. You may be* thinking that I am referring to some rare
> animal that is critically endangered in a zoo, and these certainly exist,
> but I am referring to something else. This is an Aurochs:
>
> Okay, this painting is a bit old, let me find something a bit newer. This
> is an Aurochs:
>
> Look familiar? The meat from these is quite tasty, and, as you can see
> from the first painting, it is likely that even our earliest cave dwelling
> ancestors feasted on the meat of wild Aurochs. Of course, they no longer
> exist in the wild, because we hunted them to extinction, in Poland, in the
> 1600’s (hmm, the same time we drove dodos to extinction… coincidence?)
> Well, we enjoyed the taste of beef so much, that our ancient ancestors kept
> trying to figure out how to cage them and keep a ready supply of beef for
> consumption.
>
> *This proved difficult, as these beast were massive, standing taller than
> a man, and at sizes that only* Paul Bunyan’s faithful blue companion
> could rival in more modern times. So, man tried to capture the runts of the
> herd, and keep these in captivity, as it was easier to fence them in. *These
> same early farmers discovered that by eating the biggest Aurochs, and
> letting the smaller ones live longer, and reproduce, they could get herds
> of smaller, and more docile animals.*
>
> When the last of the really big, wild Aurochs were hunted to extinction,
> the world had a fairly large number of cattle in captivity, in large herds. In
> fact, nowadays, or at least as of 2013, the FAO estimated the world’s
> population of cattle at around 1.47 billion!![1] This means, that by
> being tasty and easy to maintain, domesticated cattle have extremely high
> numbers, while their wild ancestors are gone. *American Bison(which
> everyone in America refers to as Buffalo), were nearly hunted to
> extinction,* except for a small herd that happened to be surrounded by a
> national park. Now, a number of ranchers have started to breed herds of
> American Bison, as Buffalo burgers are being hailed as a low fat and more
> sustainable form of beef that is adapted to the American landscape, and
> requires less water and crops to raise. The American bison has seen a
> resurgence in population at the same time.
>
> *So, by tasting good, Beef, and American Bison, have managed not to go the
> way of the Dodo.*
>
> Footnotes [1] FAOSTAT
>
> Q8 Is there any water content inside of our bones?
>
> A8 Ken Saladin Author, Anatomy & Physiology—The Unity of Form
> and FunctionSep 26
>
> *Oh yes, of course. The word skeleton literally means “dried up,” because
> of the way most people view bones, but the living skeleton is most
> definitely a living, metabolically dynamic structure*.
>
> The bones are full of fluid-filled channels, blood vessels, nerves, and
> cells, not to mention the fluid bone marrow in the middle. The skeleton is
> where our blood cells are made.
>
> There’s a great difference in weight between a bone fresh out of the body
> and a bone that has been cleaned and dried for study in the anatomy lab
> or a dried bone found out in nature. *That’s mostly because of the water
> in the bone’s cells and tissues.*
>
> *The Journal of Biological Chemistry says living human bones are about 31%
> water by weight. That’s much less than most other organs, but it’s still a
> lot.*
>
> According to H.H. Mitchell, Journal of Biological Chemistry 158, the brain
> and heart are composed of 73% water, and the lungs are about 83% water. The
> skin contains 64% water, muscles and kidneys are 79%, and even the bones
> are watery: 31%. *Each day humans must consume a certain amount of water
> to survive.[1]*
>
> Footnotes [1] The Water in You: Water and the Human Body
>
> Q9 Has Lord Shiva shown his Virat Roop to anyone like how Lord
> Krishna did in the Mahabharata?
>
> A9 S Chakraborty Studied Mahabharata (Hindu epic) 23h
>
> *Yeah he showed his cosmic form to Lord Rama Thereafter lord Shiva showed
> Rama by opened his mouth which was as wide as Patala loka*. Blazing with
> billions of lightening strikes seeing such a dreadful scene *Sri Rama
> trembling with fear collapsed on the ground on his knees*. He prostrated
> on the ground and numerous times he prayed to Lord Shiva. Then that mighty
> armed hero Rama gaining some strength again looked at the cosmic form of
> the Eswara the destroyer of the three cities. He sighted billions of
> universes as like as the groundnuts being roasted in blazing fires*. He
> saw inside the mouth Meru, Mandara Vindhya etc. giant mountains, seven
> great oceans, Sun, moon and planets, five elements, all deities, all dense
> forests.*
>
> He also witnessed the mighty serpent Adi-Sesha, fourteen worlds, in every
> universe he witnessed Devasura Sangrama (battles of gods and demons), their
> cause and effects. *He also witnessed Lord Vishnu's ten primary
> incarnations and their roles, duties and work.* He witnessed God's valor,
> the event of destruction of the three cities by Shiva. He saw all the
> creatures who are yet to be born, which were born in past and which were
> being born. He further saw the destruction of all these creation. SHIVA
> GITA CH 07 Padma Purana
>
> Now some people may call this inauthentic so i am giving proof from other
> sources which will further support my claim
>
> “Salutions to lord Rudra who assumes universal form or Vishvaroopam”
> Yajurveda ,Rudra Anuvaka 4
>
> Q10 What is the most fragile bone in the human body?
>
> A10 Ken Saladin Former professor of histology (microscopic
> anatomy)Nov 3
>
> *I’d go with the stapes, the smallest bone of the middle ear, as the most
> delicate*. It’s hardly ever fractured, however, since it’s so well
> protected. It would take major skull trauma to break this little bone.
>
> *The stapes is the bone at the bottom, compared to the smallest U.S. coin.*
>
> There is, of course, a difference between what is the most fragile bone
> and what is the most frequently fractured bone. *As protected as it is
> within the cranium, the stapes is surely one of the least fractured bones
> of the body*. Bones often described as the most frequently fractured are
> the clavicle and toe bones—clearly not as delicate as the stapes, but far
> more exposed to trauma.
>
> *UPDATE: Since so many are asking, the three bones from left to right are
> known by their Latin* anatomical names malleus, incus, and stapes, or
> colloquially by the English translations of these three words, hammer,
> anvil, and stirrup, respectively.
>
> *All the above QA are from Quora website on 16-12- 2021. *
>
> *Compiled and posted by R. Gopala krishnan ,78, former AGM Telecom
> Trivandrum on 17 -12-2021*
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/816168725.2031737.1639706067738%40mail.yahoo.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/816168725.2031737.1639706067738%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorL1a_GRJhM5M7S5Y6cXyQ0H6LL99c%2B_xe%3DNx74p18Q0Q%40mail.gmail.com.
