Pranam
 Attn Mr Gopalakrishnan: 2 things 1 All those words were in response to his
N's reply , and all words were only to Him and not to you; and this reveals
your Jalra attitude and paramartha bhakthi as well as the ignorance exposed
all the time; you are in a hurry; read always in between the lines; and
read thoroughly before inking. 2    Writing brothers and sisters I had
never spoken about at all; I spoke about his presumed pandityam of veda and
sanskrit  telling you IT IS NOT MENA BUT MEGHA; IT IS ONLY MENA i
confirmed; since you always copy and paste filling the pages, without
reading, just to show yourself in line with your Guru, you missed it, where
i did establish beyond the doubt, you are correct; but as usual out of
ignorance you missed the bus. Do you know the meaning of being humble?. Not
clapping like the monkey keyed doll; jalra; fawning;  Nidya the knowledge
gives that Vinayam and only because  God had given me that, I am again and
again writing to you to wake up from the false-sleep but in vain. Why do
you beat and then take the consequences?. KR IRS 191221

On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 19:13, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Mr Rajaram,
>
>  You have least patience. You are hurried and blaming nature.
> Mr Narayanaswamy added a list of 10 ten sisters to Parvati and one brother
> in a short mail which is a normal response.
>
> You wrote he(myself)  h*as a problem being out of his mind and sight; he
> never reads; and he thinks he is scholar.*
>
> What your  response has to do with Mr Narayanaswamy addition?
>
> Other than your ignorance and stupid response, I have nothing more to
> write. Mr Rajaram, when will you become humble?
>
> Gopalakrishnan
>
>
> On Saturday, 18 December, 2021, 06:35:20 pm IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Dear folks
>
> Slice a kuratthi's tongue, and she will still wiggle two fingers to show
> her mud pot's price is two annas.
>
> Our STETCON taxman-conman repeats that a shoodran's job is unraveling
> formulae, not adhering to his hereditary trade or occupation such as
> tinsmith, carpenter, dhobi, barber, cremation-ground guard, etc.
>
> The lout can shout as loud and often as he wants.  He is only a frog in
> the well.
>
> Our Vinayaka sthrothram goes like this:-
>
> mooshika vaahana mothaka hastha
> shyaamala varna vilambitha soothraa
> vaamana roopa maheshvara puthra.....
>
> Where does the conman's "formula" come here?  "soothra" here is "formula"?
>
> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>
> On 18 Dec 2021, at 11:36 AM, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> Pranam
>  You are mistaken; he has a problem being out of his mind and sight; he
> never reads; and he thinks he is scholar; and as Sisupalan curses all as an
> ashtothram of illegitimate jargons. Had he read it properly, he would have
> found that 1  SUTRA ALSO MEANT A FORMULA WHICH i SAID; 2 AND MENA IS (NOT
> NEGA AS HE WROTE)   Menā (मेना).—Wife of Himavān. Beautiful Menā was the
> daughter of Mahāmeru. CORRECT; AND MENAVATI IS. SHIRK HIM OUT.Menā (मेना)
> is one of the three daughters of Svadhā
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/svadha#purana> who is one of the
> sixty daughters of Dakṣa, according to the Śivapurāṇa 2.3.2
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/shiva-purana-english/d/doc226066.html>
> .  Accordingly, as Brahmā narrated to Nārada:—
> “[...] the daughter Svadhā was given to the forefathers. She had three
> daughters all of whom were of handsome features and virtuous forms. O
> excellent sage, listen to their holy names which remove obstacles and
> confer blessings. Menā was the eldest. Dhanyā was in the middle. Kalāvatī
> was the youngest. All these were mentally conceived daughters of the
> forefathers. They were not born in the womb of Svadhā. They were
> conventionally considered her children. On reciting their names, men can
> achieve their desires”
> Rig Veda 1.51.13:अद॑दा॒ अर्भां॑ मह॒ते व॑च॒स्यवे॑ क॒क्षीव॑ते वृच॒यामि॑न्द्र
> सुन्व॒ते । मेना॑भवो वृषण॒श्वस्य॑ सुक्रतो॒ विश्वेत्ता ते॒ सव॑नेषु
> प्र॒वाच्या॑ ॥   “You have given, Indra
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/indra#hinduism>, the youthful
> Vṛcaya to the aged Kakṣīvat
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/kakshivat#hinduism>, praising you
> and offering oblations; you, Śatakratu
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/shatakratu#hinduism>, were Menā
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/mena#hinduism>, the daughter of
> Vṛṣaṇaśva <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/vrishanashva#hinduism>; all
> these your deeds are to be recited at your worship.”   Commentary by
> Sāyaṇa: Ṛgveda-bhāṣya   Vṛcaya was given to Kakṣīvat at  a rājasūya
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/rajasuya#hinduism> ceremony. Indra
> became Menā, the daughter of Vṛṣaṇaśva and later, also fell in love with
> her. Menā is a daughter of Pitṛs
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/pitri#hinduism> by Svadhā
> <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/svadha#hinduism> and the wife of
> Himavat <https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/himavat#hinduism>, king of
> mountains. KR IRS 181221
>
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 07:40, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Sir
> Thank you for reading my posting and responding with added information
> Gopala Krishnan
>
> On Saturday, 18 December, 2021, 06:46:09 am IST, Narayanaswamy Iyer <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Dear folks
>
> *"Q1            Is Ganga a sister of Parvati?*
>
> Yes. First, Goddess Ganga took birth. Her Parents were King Himavan (also
> known as Himavat or Himraj) and Queen Menawati. Then Goddess Maa Shakti
> (also known Adi Shakti or Adi Parashakti) took birth as Goddess Parvati, so
> he became the younger daughter of King Himavat and Queen Menawati. *That
> means Maa Ganga is the elder sister of Maa Parvati."*
>
> My comments:-
>
> Himavaan means Snow-mountain.   Meghaavathi (not menawati) means
> Cloud-maiden.
>
> From the snow melting on the mountain originated rivulets which grew into
> tributaries which combined to become rivers.
>
> Not only Ganga, but also Yamuna, Sindhu, and Sarasvathi, "took birth as
> daughters" of the Mountain-king.  So did Rivers Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas,
> and Sutlej, and all are equally "daughters".
>
> In addition River Brahmaputhra is a son.
>
> Paarvathi, meaning Mountain-maiden, therefore has one elder brother and no
> less than eight elder sisters.
>
> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>
> On 17 Dec 2021, at 9:54 AM, 'gopala krishnan' via iyer123 <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> *CULTURAL QA 12-2021-17*
>
> *BEING  A COMPILATION THERE MAY  BE ERRORS*
>
> *Q1            Is Ganga a sister of Parvati?*
>
> A1            Divyansh Saxena Dec 1
>
> Yes. First, Goddess Ganga took birth. Her Parents were King Himavan (also
> known as Himavat or Himraj) and Queen Menawati. Then Goddess Maa Shakti
> (also known Adi Shakti or Adi Parashakti) took birth as Goddess Parvati, so
> he became the younger daughter of King Himavat and Queen Menawati. *That
> means Maa Ganga is the elder sister of Maa Parvati.*
>
> Goddess Ganga (Goddess of purity). She is a river Goddess.
>
> Q2            How was plastic invented by mistake?
>
> A2            Steven Haddock Studied at York University (Canada)Dec 8
>
> *Well, it should be “How was one of the first important plastics
> accidentally invented. Twice”.*
>
> The plastic in this case is Polyvinyl Chloride, which is still in
> widespread use. It’s the third most manufactured plastic on the planet.
>
> We start in 1838 with Henri Victor Regnault. Among his other
> accomplishments, he worked with chlorinated hydrocarbons, *taking a
> chance on combining chlorine with organic compounds.*
>
> *One of these was vinyl chloride. One day, he prepared a solution of it
> and then left it alone for a few weeks in the sun. It had solidified in the
> meantime.* He made a note of it but never published his work on it or
> patented it.
>
> But in 1872, a German chemist named Eugen Baumann also had a solution of
> vinyl chloride that he left out in the sun with the same results. However,
> not finding a patent for it, he took one out.
>
> *This magnificent discovery of artificial long chain molecules then, of
> course, revolutionized everything!*
>
> Oh who am I kidding. *The development was ignored for another thirty
> years*. Then a couple of chemists working for the German chemical company
> Griesheim-Elektron made the *giant breakthrough that made PVC what it is
> today.*
>
> No, sorry, they didn’t. They found the stuff too rigid, brittle and hard
> to work with. They couldn’t come up with any commercial applications either.
>
> Finally, in 1926, 88 years after the compound was synthesized and 54 years
> after it was patented, a chemist at *B.F. Goodrich named Waldo Semon
> found that if he mixed PVC with other chemicals it became workable and
> could be commercially processed.*
>
> *Q3            Do zoos give special food to flamingos to keep them pink?*
>
> A3            About Wild Animals Patrick Colligan Nov 29
>
> *Yes. They are fed a powdery substance called Flamingo Mix.* The
> Flamingos dip their beaks into the powder. Then, place their beaks into the
> water and shake them from side to side. *Flamingos are filter feeders.
> They strain their food. Their pink color comes from beta carotene*, a
> pigment found in the algae and brine shrimp, that compose their natural
> diet.
>
> *Q4            Have we learned everything about the human body? If not,
> how much do we really know?*
>
> A4            Ken Saladin Former professor of histology (microscopic
> anatomy)Wed
>
> I learn several new things every year. Even though I “wrote the book on
> it,” so to speak, I update it every 3 to 4 years with what I’ve learned new
> since the last time I revised it. So do all the other anatomy authors I
> compete with. If I didn’t, I’d fall behind the science and lose readers, my
> market share.
>
> I’m starting the 7th edition of that book now, and just finishing up the
> 10th edition of the one below. Updated answer keys to the chapter review
> questions today.
>
> *This is how I make my living—keeping up with stuff* scientists learn
> about the human body that we didn’t know last week, last month, last year.
>
> Q5            What are some amazing facts about the Indian Railways?
>
> A5            Atharva Dave Lives in Mumbai, Maharashtra, IndiaUpdated 1y
>
> 1.The resonance frequency of the suspension for the coaches is kept as
> close as possible to 72 bpm or 1.2 Hz while designing which is optimal for
> sleep and relaxation.
>
> 2.The diamond crossing (dubbed so by railways themselves), in Nagpur, is
> one-of-its-kind, from where trains go East, West, North and South.
>
> 3.The Indian Railways is the 8th largest employer in the world with 14
> lakh employees.
>
> 4.The IRCTC website is the second most visited website in India.
>
> 5.The under-construction Chenab railway bridge, in Reasi district, J&K, is
> expected to be one of the highest rail bridges in the world, when completed.
>
> *My note- It is inaugurated and trains are running* over the bridge now
>
> 6.The famed Darjeeling "toy train," which is still running on its
> indigenous steam engine, was built by India's British colonial master in
> 1881.
>
> 7.The track length of Indian Railways can circle the equator one and a
> half times.
>
> *8.Shrirampur and Belapur are two different stations in Maharashtra's
> Ahmednagar district, at the same* location on the railway route but on
> opposite sides of the track.
>
> 9.Indian Railways runs as many as 19,000 trains every day. Some 12,000
> trains are for passengers and 7,000 for freight.
>
> 10. The railway station of Navapur is built in 2 states; one half of it is
> in Maharashtra and the other half is in Gujarat.
>
> *And another station named Bhawani Mandi is also divided into two states
> Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh.*
>
> 11.Indian Railways did not have a toilet for 50 years until one passenger
> wrote an angry letter to Indian Railways.
>
> *My note- It is a repeated QA for refreshing.*
>
> *Q6            How did cows evolve? How did they not get eaten to
> extinction by predators? They look like big, stupid, slow animals.*
>
> A6            Stephen Merkel Former Ballistic Engineer (2011–2013)Updated
> 3y
>
> *This is a cow: People bred these to be easy to* control and smaller than
> their wild counterparts, basically just lambs to the slaughter… or cattle.
> (sorry, I know I know)
>
> *This is an Aurochs:These were massive creatures, who were intelligent,
> and so fierce, that humans* were unable to tame them. Humans managed to
> breed some of them down into smaller, *less intelligent animals that we
> could farm effectively, but *their ancestors were formidable, and fought
> off predators by having the largest bulls protect the herd, and the
> weakest calves were protected in the center of the herd. Unfortunately,
> they were hunted to their extinction in the wild, and only survive today
> in the form of modern domestic cattle. Some people are attempting to
> genetically resurrect the larger, more intelligent wild Aurochs, from
> domesticated stock, but the process is slow going. So far, they have
> managed to breed much of the size back in:
>
> But the survival instincts are not quite there in the calves they have
> bred as of yet.
>
> For a better explanation of how this……could be a valid evolutionary
> survival strategy, see my answer here:
>
> *Q7            Why do animals taste good? If evolution is about surviving
> and reproducing in the best possible way, why not make predators not want
> to eat you?*
>
> A7            Stephen Merkel, I enjoy eating, and experiment in the
> kitchenUpdated Mar 7, 2019 , trained chef with a borderline obsessive
> interest in food history and science
>
> This is a dodo bird:
>
> Not much of a looker, is he? Well, the dodo has one thing going for him,
> his meat tastes absolutely horrible. It is stringy, and not palatable in
> the least... Or so said *the sailors who were forced to survive on dodo
> meat while on the island of Mauritius.*
>
>  They still ate the birds in droves, but what truly did them in was the
> pigs and rats that got loose on the island, which ate their eggs from the
> nest. (They laid their eggs, one per bird, on the ground, as they didn’t
> have any natural predators on the island) They went extinct sometime in the
> 1660’s.
>
> *Perhaps they could have been saved, and survive to this day. If the
> sailors found them tasty, it might have made them put in the effort to
> capture some,* and farm them. If these sailors turned farmers were
> raising dodos as a food source, and discovered pigs or rats eating the
> eggs, they would most decidedly take efforts to stop their livestock from
> being killed, and would have ensured a captive population survived.
>
> *In fact, some species are completely extinct in the wild, and only raised
> in captivity. You may be* thinking that I am referring to some rare
> animal that is critically endangered in a zoo, and these certainly exist,
> but I am referring to something else. This is an Aurochs:
>
> Okay, this painting is a bit old, let me find something a bit newer. This
> is an Aurochs:
>
> Look familiar? The meat from these is quite tasty, and, as you can see
> from the first painting, it is likely that even our earliest cave dwelling
> ancestors feasted on the meat of wild Aurochs. Of course, they no longer
> exist in the wild, because we hunted them to extinction, in Poland, in the
> 1600’s (hmm, the same time we drove dodos to extinction… coincidence?)
> Well, we enjoyed the taste of beef so much, that our ancient ancestors kept
> trying to figure out how to cage them and keep a ready supply of beef for
> consumption.
>
> *This proved difficult, as these beast were massive, standing taller than
> a man, and at sizes that only* Paul Bunyan’s faithful blue companion
> could rival in more modern times. So, man tried to capture the runts of the
> herd, and keep these in captivity, as it was easier to fence them in. *These
> same early farmers discovered that by eating the biggest Aurochs, and
> letting the smaller ones live longer, and reproduce, they could get herds
> of smaller, and more docile animals.*
>
> When the last of the really big, wild Aurochs were hunted to extinction,
> the world had a fairly large number of cattle in captivity, in large herds. In
> fact, nowadays, or at least as of 2013, the FAO estimated the world’s
> population of cattle at around 1.47 billion!![1] This means, that by
> being tasty and easy to maintain, domesticated cattle have extremely high
> numbers, while their wild ancestors are gone. *American Bison(which
> everyone in America refers to as Buffalo), were nearly hunted to
> extinction,* except for a small herd that happened to be surrounded by a
> national park. Now, a number of ranchers have started to breed herds of
> American Bison, as Buffalo burgers are being hailed as a low fat and more
> sustainable form of beef that is adapted to the American landscape, and
> requires less water and crops to raise. The American bison has seen a
> resurgence in population at the same time.
>
> *So, by tasting good, Beef, and American Bison, have managed not to go the
> way of the Dodo.*
>
> Footnotes [1] FAOSTAT
>
> Q8            Is there any water content inside of our bones?
>
> A8            Ken Saladin Author, Anatomy & Physiology—The Unity of Form
> and FunctionSep 26
>
> *Oh yes, of course. The word skeleton literally means “dried up,” because
> of the way most people view bones, but the living skeleton is most
> definitely a living, metabolically dynamic structure*.
>
> The bones are full of fluid-filled channels, blood vessels, nerves, and
> cells, not to mention the fluid bone marrow in the middle. The skeleton is
> where our blood cells are made.
>
> There’s a great difference in weight between a bone fresh out of the body
> and a bone that has been cleaned and dried for study in the anatomy lab
> or a dried bone found out in nature. *That’s mostly because of the water
> in the bone’s cells and tissues.*
>
> *The Journal of Biological Chemistry says living human bones are about 31%
> water by weight. That’s much less than most other organs, but it’s still a
> lot.*
>
> According to H.H. Mitchell, Journal of Biological Chemistry 158, the brain
> and heart are composed of 73% water, and the lungs are about 83% water. The
> skin contains 64% water, muscles and kidneys are 79%, and even the bones
> are watery: 31%. *Each day humans must consume a certain amount of water
> to survive.[1]*
>
> Footnotes [1] The Water in You: Water and the Human Body
>
> Q9            Has Lord Shiva shown his Virat Roop to anyone like how Lord
> Krishna did in the Mahabharata?
>
> A9            S Chakraborty Studied Mahabharata (Hindu epic) 23h
>
> *Yeah he showed his cosmic form to Lord Rama Thereafter lord Shiva showed
> Rama by opened his mouth which was as wide as Patala loka*. Blazing with
> billions of lightening strikes seeing such a dreadful scene *Sri Rama
> trembling with fear collapsed on the ground on his knees*. He prostrated
> on the ground and numerous times he prayed to Lord Shiva. Then that mighty
> armed hero Rama gaining some strength again looked at the cosmic form of
> the Eswara the destroyer of the three cities. He sighted billions of
> universes as like as the groundnuts being roasted in blazing fires*. He
> saw inside the mouth Meru, Mandara Vindhya etc. giant mountains, seven
> great oceans, Sun, moon and planets, five elements, all deities, all dense
> forests.*
>
> He also witnessed the mighty serpent Adi-Sesha, fourteen worlds, in every
> universe he witnessed Devasura Sangrama (battles of gods and demons), their
> cause and effects. *He also witnessed Lord Vishnu's ten primary
> incarnations and their roles, duties and work.* He witnessed God's valor,
> the event of destruction of the three cities by Shiva. He saw all the
> creatures who are yet to be born, which were born in past and which were
> being born. He further saw the destruction of all these creation. SHIVA
> GITA CH 07 Padma Purana
>
> Now some people may call this inauthentic so i am giving proof from other
> sources which will further support my claim
>
> “Salutions to lord Rudra who assumes universal form or Vishvaroopam”
> Yajurveda ,Rudra Anuvaka 4
>
> Q10         What is the most fragile bone in the human body?
>
> A10          Ken Saladin Former professor of histology (microscopic
> anatomy)Nov 3
>
> *I’d go with the stapes, the smallest bone of the middle ear, as the most
> delicate*. It’s hardly ever fractured, however, since it’s so well
> protected. It would take major skull trauma to break this little bone.
>
> *The stapes is the bone at the bottom, compared to the smallest U.S. coin.*
>
> There is, of course, a difference between what is the most fragile bone
> and what is the most frequently fractured bone. *As protected as it is
> within the cranium, the stapes is surely one of the least fractured bones
> of the body*. Bones often described as the most frequently fractured are
> the clavicle and toe bones—clearly not as delicate as the stapes, but far
> more exposed to trauma.
>
> *UPDATE: Since so many are asking, the three bones from left to right are
> known by their Latin* anatomical names malleus, incus, and stapes, or
> colloquially by the English translations of these three words, hammer,
> anvil, and stirrup, respectively.
>
> *All the above QA are from  Quora  website  on    16-12- 2021. *
>
> *Compiled and posted by R. Gopala krishnan ,78, former  AGM Telecom
> Trivandrum on 17 -12-2021*
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/816168725.2031737.1639706067738%40mail.yahoo.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/816168725.2031737.1639706067738%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/FEBDA686-5C21-4CBE-9124-45882BF04EA4%40gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/FEBDA686-5C21-4CBE-9124-45882BF04EA4%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1949680004.2285247.1639793437764%40mail.yahoo.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1949680004.2285247.1639793437764%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoogrTw9AMS8g6Zeb4AEnDELsgvyaTNq1FBPwTxc5x59kQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to