Pranam This is a point where I must make myself clear against false allegations of Mr Go[palakrishnan as well as his partner Mr Narayanaswamy. Some of his notes (G): 1 Sri Rajaram Krishnamurthy, former IRS 2 The posting of responses with uncultured contents started by Sri Rajaram. 3 aimed at me and Mr. Narayanaswamy. Now instead of prose, they have come in verse. Many words in Tamil and street language. 4 *it is below my dignity to respond to him 5 *Mr. Narayanaswamy has told in the forum, if Mr. Rajaram stops his bad responses, he would not post any mail containing bad words and regretted for such incidences . But still Rajaram continues. He has NEVER REGRETTED. 6 Mr. Rajaram is former IRS. 7 He is younger to Mr. Narayanaswamy 8 * Mr. Narayanaswamy only responds to the points and statements of Mr. Rajaram. This all members may kindly note. 9 *to stop his unwanted responses containing bad words. 10 this is an impartial mail. 2 Now those words heer used require an update whether these facts are true?. First of all Mr G who has a lot of archives can go back and produce all emails where I started first; both against him as well as Narayanaswamy; I want him to do this exercise consciously. Then this issue as pretended by Mr G and Mr N would stop since those who started the battle shall end it not the defender which is unethical. 3 I had written already that i do meet the content by content but had never ever , whether G or N or YM or Mr S C A or Mr R or anyone in this forum PERSONALLY CALLING NAMES. Can they prove?. I challenge; open your account and open your personal criticism started by both of you and turned later, as if both are using their content, as my content, abusing me personally and pointing out that I attack them; pl prove from day one; I have all the texts in my files from day one not only in the recent era but even the old one era when Mr N used to write in US forum. I hold all and though huge can release all. 4 If I have a view- say-for example "Vadyars are no good", then meet that with the content; but who opened the refined words (if my words were bad then those words are so refined written by NarayanaswamY? ) as sarva pappi, chandalan, syphilis etc ? Mr N only called my mother a prostitute and I did tell him why would you bother?; and next what he did?; he wrote that I am admitting my mother is so; and started with those pungent texts which everyone including your Indian knew; some even wrote to him, "why all these"; but his words were so refined in multiple languages with the etiquettes showered upon me personally, which an aged 96 is not expected to do; and not only me; many are frightened about him in this group since he abused to ask every one in such a "madras-language" that no one will accept him as a brahmin; and VELIKKU OONAAN SAKSHI?; after a very long time I gave back and am giving back for every production of words he uses; HE DOES NOT USE WORDS AGAINST MINE; i AM USING IF n+1TH TIME TIT FOR TAT. Had he raised content to content there will be only the content. But he cannot abuse any one and that does not make him elder. If elder misbehaves, younger would only hit back. Check the contents from day one. So let him stop if everything had to stop and all those who advocate to me , may kindly advocate G and N also and G may also point blank write in the same style in which he had written to me. NO PERSONAL FAMILY ABUSES. CONTENT BY CONTENT (I shall also meet his content that how I have different facts with ref to the Trinachiketa etc elsewhere; I was waiting some one would speak; but even after 3 days no one did). Content by content. I do not any certificate or discredit of his definition personally attributed. Writing is right but writing against the personal descriptions is unwarranted which would apply to both Mr G and Mr N. Age is not a factor. The advocate who spoke about age and senior etc, wrote so sweetly calling some one as GURU; after a few weeks after such a sweet words used in that writing of the sraddha - in one email, when I was pointing out that Mr G received an answer from that GURU as only like that, he wrote in this email group itself that -that GURU is unfit to be a GURU; and that GURU was elder to Mr G and Mr G treated him so nicely that elder; and that G is advising me about the elderliness of Mr N. 5 Now Mr G how does he open former IRS ; what is the necessity for him to address me?; Same question I do raise; in what way one is concerned about my status or English personally; and when I retort back, accusing me as if I am the culprit? Who started the abuse ex, former, does not know English etc?. Who can say in a group that content shall not be met by the content?. When the initiates start the abuses, and do they think the opposite would wait to receive all the unnecessary brickbats and for what reason and why should it be me?. What it does concern whether its a bad English or broken English?. The person who is so dignified, does not show his dignity in the write ups?. Who are they whosoever it may be, to criticise personally me and why?. I KNOW THE RERASON BUT ARE YOU AWARE?. Stop thy grouse all will end. I shall write whatever I view AS IN CONTENT DIFFERENT AND THAT CAN BE MET BY ANOTHER CONTENT ONLY DO IT . But do not worry about my status and my language and attributions of the ancient writers. Pl do not pretend as if you are so true; nothing is too late; no one has a right to stop things in a public forum; I do not enter your home privacy; and the content does not call for abusive pithy language. I have not written in Tamil to which Mr N wrote but vice-versa. I did not call Mr G as ex chief manager but he did which was rebutted. There is nothing as age etc. Dignity is a common property not belonging to one only as if a right-to-hold. 6 Now wrt Mr YM, "I ignore if it insults"; is a misnomer; when did I insult you?; had every one in this forum out of a complexity, interpreted it as differently, I cannot be held responsible. It is your prerogative, to accuse for bank int taxation as bad; but I may think the opposite which is not an insult; you may think that nature protection is not uprooting or using modern gadgets; but after destroying the forests only we have our homes; and so what we did cannot be right while it is wrong wrt others. Where is insult here. Even Mr Sekar had such opinion. Every one grows and learns. Salt for one's need might be a killer for another, and so calling the salt as God or demon is not the absolute fact. I have never written anything personally but questioned the preponderances of the probabilities. 7 When a quote does appear as when one is bad and another oppose -they perish, TO ME it does mean that the offender and the defender -THEY perish; I think then does it mean that Rama and Ravanan together perish? In me I feel the dharma alone can be victorious. If there is a different opinion let there be some content where both the dharma and the adharma perished; instead Mr N call me by names and writes "indru poi nalai vaa Raman etc?; is that the content or abusing me?. 8 Hence Mr G and Mr N can write from the scriptures or authentic data that it is so-FULL STOP; no personal attributions and man slaughters and character assassinations; if I am ex IRS then Mr G is only an ex chief manager and below even; what right he has I can also wield. If the content is bitter please give a counter authentic content and do not confirm that what is written is bound to contain errors and then accuse for the opposite content and English errors; or else pl do not write erroneous. 9 After all all the time I have been writing that no one knows anyone here, except a few within a chain; then why would one become jealous? Why would one is abused so lowly?. Because of the inferiority complex only. Lets appreciate. I do but you start a new leaf. Or face the routine. KR IRS 12422
On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 09:37, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN TWO MEMBERS > > Respected friends and moderator, > > It is about a fortnight, I simply marked responses from Sri Rajaram > Krishnamurthy, former IRS and not respond to him. Still some responses > appears in box. > > The posting of responses with uncultured contents started by Sri Rajaram. > His responses aimed at me and Mr. Narayanaswamy. Now instead of prose, they > have come in verse. Many words in Tamil and street language. > > *I got fed up and wrote replying to Mr. Rajaram that it is below my > dignity to respond to him.* Many times Mr. Narayanaswamy has told in the > forum, if Mr. Rajaram stops his bad responses, he would not post any mail > containing bad words and regretted for such incidences . But still > Rajaram continues. He has NEVER REGRETTED. > > The important point is very few comments, but finds nothing is done by > members. Mr. Rajaram is former IRS. He is younger to Mr. Narayanaswamy*. > Mr. Narayanaswamy only responds to the points and statements of Mr. > Rajaram. This all members may kindly note. * > > I request Mr. Rajaram first to stop his unwanted responses containing bad > words. I am sure Mr. Narayanaswamy, the senior member will start to use > excellent English words and write diplomatically in the forum. *I have > wrote to Mr Narayanaswamy also in these lines. * > > It is a fact Mr. Narayanaswamy appreciates my good postings and *comment > when there are mistakes and point out them*. There were occasions some > members cornering me and Sri Narayanaswamy had come as a supporter and > savior from the attaching members . I have my in-depth gratitude to him. > > Members may Kindly note this is an impartial mail > > Gopalakrishnan 12-04-2022 > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqAiNroLBNANczQYF2fuzD90SYMHZUckpTdzUOR%3DjTUOg%40mail.gmail.com.
