Pranam May be preparing the grounds for the equity judgement later on the future issues?: *“Indian” judgement based on **the** INABILITY to DECIDE ? yes and no.*
*SC judge who blamed Nupur Sharma for Udaipur beheading by Islamists had earlier expunged his ‘unnecessary’ comments on reservations: * *In December 2015, 58 lawmakers in the Rajya Sabha submitted a petition to Chair Hamid Ansari seeking to move an impeachment motion against Gujarat High Court judge J.B. Pardiwala. Following the petition, the judge deleted the remarks from his judgment saying they were not "relevant and necessary".* According to reports <https://www.timesnownews.com/india/who-is-justice-pardiwala-the-supreme-court-judge-who-is-in-line-to-become-chief-justice-of-india-article-91433231>, Justice J.B Pardiwala is set to become the Chief Justice of India when Justice PS Narasimha retires in May 2028. He will have a tenure lasting till August 11, 2030, until his retirement. His father, Burjorji Cawasji Pardiwala, had joined the Bar in 1955 and was the president of the Valsad District Bar Association. Burjorji was also a Congress MLA and had served as the Speaker of the seventh Gujarat Assembly (1989-1990). KR IRS 1722 On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 13:08, 'N Sekar' via iyer123 <[email protected]> wrote: > Supreme Court speaks like Islamists, conducts a witch trial blaming Nupur > Sharma’s ‘loose tongue’ for Hindu man’s beheading by Islamic fanatics > > The Supreme Court of the so-called secular, democratic country, which is > supposed to be the conscience of the nation, has shockingly chosen to > behave like a Church figure in a medieval witch trial > > The Supreme Court of India has blamed former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma > for the brutal Udaipur murder > <https://www.opindia.com/2022/07/family-kanhaiya-lal-call-ashok-gehlot-a-slave-of-muslims-details/> > and > has stated that her ‘loose tongue’ has set the entire country on fire and > she should apologise to the whole country. > > Family member of Kanhaiya Lal calls Ashok Gehlot a 'slave of Muslims', d... > > The brutal beheading of Hindu man Kanhaiya Lal by two Islamists, Mohammed > Riyaz Akhtar and Mohammed Gaus, merely... > > <https://www.opindia.com/2022/07/family-kanhaiya-lal-call-ashok-gehlot-a-slave-of-muslims-details/> > > > As per reports, Nupur Sharma had moved the SC seeking the transfer of all > the FIRs registered against her, across several states to Delhi for further > investigation. Sharma, in her application, stated that she is facing > constant life threats. > The apex court, surprisingly, had placed all the blame on Nupur Sharma and > her ‘loose tongue’ over the remarks on Prophet Muhammad that were deemed as > ‘blasphemy’ by Islamists. The SC has lambasted Sharma saying that it was > her and her ‘loose tongue’ that has set the entire country on fire and she > should apologise to the whole country. > > Blaming Nupur Sharma for the chaos unleashed by the Islamists and the > regressive ideas that ambiguously declare any criticism of the Islamic > prophet as ‘blasphemy’, the apex court of the country has surprisingly > ignored the hatred and violence unleashed by Islamists and has instead > blamed the woman who had stated merely what is written in Islamic hadiths, > and affirmed by Islamic scholars > <https://www.opindia.com/2022/06/islamic-scholar-assim-alhakeem-nupur-sharma-prophet-muhammad/> > all > over the world. > > Islamic scholar Assim Alhakeem confirms as '100% true' when asked about ... > > The controversy began when the suspended BJP spokeswoman Nupur Sharma made > comments on the Islamic Prophet durin... > > <https://www.opindia.com/2022/06/islamic-scholar-assim-alhakeem-nupur-sharma-prophet-muhammad/> > > The Supreme Court of the so-called secular, democratic country, which is > supposed to be the conscience of the nation, has shockingly chosen to > behave like a Church figure in a medieval witch trial. > > It is notable here that there have been brutal murders in India committed > by Islamists in the name of ‘blasphemy’ against Islam and the SC is aware > of that. Also, the comments by Nupur Sharma were in retaliation to > insulting and derogatory comments against the Hindu faith by a fellow > panellist, and Sharma had cited instances from the Prophet’s life, telling > that those can be said too (if the other side keeps insulting the Hindu > faith with derogatory remarks). > > The specific reference to the Prophet’s age and the age of his third wife > is asserted in Islamic hadiths and is affirmed by Islamic scholars as facts. > > The SC has not stopped at just blaming one woman for violence and murder > committed by religious fanatics in the name of Islam, it has also refused > to grant any relief to Sharma and has rejected her application to transfer > all FIRs against her to Delhi. > Ignoring the submission by Sharma’s advocate that the statements in the > news debate were withdrawn by Sharma after an apology, the court questioned > her right and need to make those statements. Upon reminding that she had > apologised, the Court stated that she should have apologised to the whole > country on TV and that she was ‘too late’ to withdraw. > > Justice Surya Kant stated, “The way she has ignited emotions across the > country… This lady is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in > the country.” > > In other words, Justice Surya Kant made it clear that for him, it is > Sharma’s fault that she spoke in a manner that ‘provoked’ the Islamists, > not the Islamists’ fault who have declared openly to behead anyone who they > deem as ‘blasphemous’. > > The apex court even stated that Nupur Sharma does not deserve the relief > granted to the common people of the country (by transferring the FIRs to > one jurisdiction). It declared that Nupur had no right to say the things > she said in the first place, indirectly justifying the open calls for her > murder and hanging. > > In short, the Supreme Court of India today declared Nupur Sharma a culprit > of blasphemy and essentially validated the Islamic calls for her beheading > and murder. They just stopped short of using the words “Gustakh-e-Nabi ki > ek hi saza, sar tan se juda’. > > Since the Supreme Court has declared that the Udaipur murder, where a > Hindu man was killed for just sharing a social media post in Sharma’s > support, is Sharma’s fault, it seems that if Sharma herself becomes a > victim of violence that Islamists have declared for her, the Supreme Court > of this country might actually say that she deserved it. > > > > > > N Sekar > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2031953592.627941.1656661093835%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/2031953592.627941.1656661093835%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqoMoB6KUg10XKjbVnwynh46t83H7qMxPQ_VD%3DntDN43Q%40mail.gmail.com.
