👋🌹 On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 23:21, 'N Sekar' via iyer123 < [email protected]> wrote:
> Long one and it misses many points but still worth reading. > > Our judiciary has become rotten. > > N Sekar > > Fwd: > _Brilliant! What a respectful attack based on irrefutable facts!_ > > *Which ‘Constitution’ is the Supreme Court of India following?* > > > Honorable CJI Ramana, > > In your recent address to Indian American audience you said, ‘Let me make > it clear, we (SC) are answerable to the Constitution and the the > Constitution alone, to enforce checks and balances enshrined in the > constitution. We need to promote constitutional culture in India and spread > the awareness of roles and responsibilities of individual institutions‘. > > Sir, we are at a loss as to which ‘Constitution’ you are referring to. > > Let us first start with the selection of the judges. > > *Sir, where in the constitution does it say that judges appoint judges, > and that too five judges including CJI, will appoint the 30 odd members of > SC who will decide the fate of 1.4 billion people across 28 states with 121 > languages (and 22 official languages).* > > *Sir, please help us find where in our constitution it says most of the > judges should be from a handful of families and we be blessed with ‘uncle’ > judges in multiple states where the relatives of the judges practice in the > court? News reports say every third high court judge is ‘uncle’. > Wonderful!* > > Sir, we also cannot wait for the third generation judges such as the > ‘Chandrachud’ family to reign over 1.4 billion hapless citizens, while the > papa will do everything to promote him during his tenure in SC, just as > many judge papas are doing right now. > > *A long-retired judge recently lamented that when he meets other judges > these days they introduce their own children as future judges!* > > *Sir, which other nation has a judiciary with complete lack of > accountability to its citizens?* > > Sir, is there anything in the constitution about checks and balances of > the judiciary? Perhaps not. The framers of our constitution did not see any > such need and are assured that judges will conduct in the most sincere and > upright manner with the best interest of the nation as is being displayed > today. > > Sir, please help us find where in the constitution does it say a person is > guilty without any trial when two SC judges - Hon. Judge Suryakant and Hon. > Judge Pardiwala - delivered their comments on Nupur Sharma for something > that is not even part of the issue she approached the court. This is > against a person where there were 70,000 threats to her life for repeating > the same thing that is certain religion scripture said. And affirmed by > many of their own, that too in the face of enormous provocation, as many > judiciary own members, bureaucrats and even army officers wrote to you > about. > > You recently warned the media and social media about kangaroo courts, > ill-informed and agenda driven debates against judiciary, and that courts > will take action. But, Sir, it begs the question: What action you plan to > take on these judges who did much worse than kangaroo court and created a > dangerous situation for many in the nation? > > Sir, you recently mentioned that judges can be vulnerable to attacks > because of media and social media comments and you are losing patience and > will act if necessary. What about us, Sir? When our homes are burnt down, > you give bail. When our women are raped and lakhs displaced, you recuse. I > can't resist asking, Sir: Is this constitution you are following based on > some gestapo document? > > Sir, which part of the constitution says the judges can recuse themselves > instead of protecting the fundamental rights of its citizens, nay, the > daylight murder of democracy in the brutal post-election violence in West > Bengal, either because they are afraid for their own or their relatives > lives or could care little to protect the women being raped and lacs of > people displaced? > > *You say judiciary is answerable to the constitution alone, please tell > where it says judges can recuse their responsibilities while they leave the > citizens whose fundamental rights they need to protect from dangerous > forces?* > > *Sir, please educate us also which part of the constitution say the > criminals and terrorists have more rights than victims and citizens.* > > What a great judiciary we have where the supreme Supreme court of India > wakes up in the middle of the night to hear about terrorist that > perpetrated a massacre, while literally 5 crores cases are pending and most > arrested spend time in jails more than if they were convicted. > > Sir, if I come and burn down your home, do you think I deserve bail? We > even arrest those who recite Hanuman Chalisa in public space without bail! > > > You are from Andhra, do you know that there were multiple well-planned > riots in Bhainsa, Telangana, by criminals who follow Islamic faith and the > perpetrators were let go with bail? > > *Sir, recently Supreme Court removed death sentence to a criminal of > Islamic faith who raped and killed a 4 year old girl. The same Supreme > court in no time affirmed death sentence to a criminal of Hindu faith who > killed a deranged woman.* > > I am looking hard, Sir, where in the constitution does it say that the > sentencing needs to be decided not based on the crime but on the faith. > Please educate us. > > Sir, while you were in US, there was a raging issue of Roe vs Wade over > abortion rights. I am not sure if you were following the debate; it is > based on Christian right belief versus the Left. This is based on majority > religion, not on Judaism or Islam, Hinduism or any other. *When the Supreme > Court of India decided on the issue of menstruating women entry to > Sabarimala, an issue of Hindus, it brought into arguments of separate > denominations like Christianity. Per official records, Christian population > is less than 5%, but then our great Supreme Court needs the Christian > denomination concept to address the issue of 10,000 year civilization of > Hindus still followed by 70% or more.* > > And more, this is in spite of temples in the country where male devotees > are likewise not allowed and has roots in local beliefs. *On top of it, the > fact the judges seriously discussing about equality of gender rights in the > face of not a single Muslim woman is allowed into even one of the lacs of > Mosque spoke volumes*. > > Sir, which constitution were SC judges (at least 4 of the 5) were > referring to when they make such judgements? > > Sir, not sure you noticed it, the original copy of the constitution of > India had a photo of Ram, Sita and Lakshmana returning to Ayodhya. Maybe > the writers of our constitution violated their own constitution! > > *Sir, the judiciary comes across that they are the police who will tell > other branches of the Government what they need to do and what not instead > of ensuring the laws passed by the parliament are adhered to and > fundamental rights are protected. It even wants to dictate what the > military does, such as in Kashmir.* > > Sir, is the Judiciary going to run the wars for the nation? Maybe the > judiciary will start taking over the administration of the nation and even > tell us who can stand in elections and who cannot. As you said, we have not > learnt to appreciate the roles and responsibilities assigned by the > constitution to each of the institutions. Maybe these are improvements on > the constitution envisioned by the judiciary, just as an unwritten > collegium and ‘uncle’ judges system! Or perhaps there is a constitution out > there SC follows that we have no clue to what it is. > > Sir, in your US speech you spoke about tolerance and inclusiveness to your > mostly Hindu audience. *We heard that you felt it is your sacred duty to > meet with Indian-American Muslim Council which is currently partnering with > Western elite forces to bring down India such as anti-CAA resolutions in > multiple US cities, even Islamophobia bill to portray India in poor light.* > Hope you gave them similar advice. How did they respond to you sir? Did you > know, it is the same organization that claims they stopped Narendra Modi > from getting a visa to the US when he was Chief Minister. But then, we have > to be inclusive and talk to everyone to prove our credentials. > > Thank you for your example. > > Sir, our Judiciary has become a paragon of inclusiveness that you will > direct its majority citizens to kill themselves to help those who are > attempting to kill them and save them the trouble. Like Mahatma Gandhi, you > will advice our women to submit to rape than to resist, as he did during > Partition riots. We will allow literally hundreds of thousands of our minor > girls to be deceptively married for conversion perhaps because we want to > be inclusive. > > *In spite of the hectic schedule, SC will even dictate the height of > Dahi-Handi pyramid, pollution from Hindu festivals but will not say a word > on Bakri-Eid slaughter pollution*. How does it matter if it is an agenda > driven to wipe out ancient civilization but we have to prove our > credentials of inclusiveness. > > Sir, I am immensely proud of the inclusiveness of our judiciary that it > will fight for the rights of illegal Rohingyas and Bangladeshis even where > they are settled there are increase in crimes, do not care even if they are > settled in selective geographic areas for political goals, while we are not > able to settle the 500,000 Kashmir Hindus for last 31 years. We will work > overtime and with urgent attention overnight to save illegal settlements > even if they are involved in crime. > > Sir, even Pakistan will give death sentence to those who did lynching or > Bangladesh resort to extrajudicial killings to radical elements, but we > have to prove our inclusiveness and ensure their rights are preserved. > Great humanity sir. The country needs to be proud of our judiciary example. > > You also spoke about great US nation. Did you know that US Global elite > are funding to do regime change in India and recently some of the Indian > news media covered on how they murdered space scientist Homi Bhabha and > Indian Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri? Have you seen the recent movie > ‘Rocketry, the Nambi effect’? > > Did you know that the PLI industry such as Human Rights Law Network > (HLRN), Amnesty International that are regulars in judiciary circles are > really front of the organisations which want to combine Muslims, converted > Christians, Dalits and do regime change so that they can have pliable > nation to be used for their goals, not for indian citizen goals? > > Did you know that the Nupur Sharma episode is an orchestrated operation? > > Did you know that US settlers completely wiped out Native Americans and > brought many millions from Africa to do brutal slavery? > > Sir, though the US has 5% of the world population, 1 out every 4 jailed > persons in the world are in the United States. We are here because we are > useful. *For you to run down India that gave refuge to every civilization > of the world and continues to help in spite of many odds it is facing, that > too in front of US elected officials and giving lectures about lack of > maturity in other Indian institutions is an extremely sad spectacle. It is > heartbreaking. Perhaps somewhere in your ‘constitution’ it gives the right > to run down your own nation in other nations!* > > *You also spoke about the example of Abraham Lincoln. Sir, did you know > that when the country is faced with civil war and lack of cooperation from > the judiciary, Lincoln is known to have planned to arrest the Chief Justice > of US Supreme Court. Perhaps that is part of history we should avoid > reading.* > > Sir, you recently mentioned that judges can be vulnerable to attacks > because of media and social media comments and you are losing patience and > will act if necessary. What about us, Sir? When our homes are burnt down > you give bail, when our women are raped and lakhs displaced you recuse, > when our hands and legs are cut you just put them in jail, when our > security personnel are stabbed and the body is thrown into ditch you would > not charge, when our heads are blown with killer rocks because we dare to > celebrate our festivals you have to go on high gear to protect their > illegal homes, when they riot with caches of killer weapons and > administration demolish their citadels you want to ensure law is followed > and when we retaliate we deserve same punishment as those who attacked us. > Only we have to answer pollution concerns for sin of celebrating our > festivals. > > Just few days you literally threw Nupur Sharma, who is no different from > your two daughters, to die a miserable death but for intervention of few. I > know what you mean, sir. You mean judges and their families lives are more > precious, while our lives are meant for sacrifice. Must be there somewhere > in your constitution. Please do not worry, sir. Our judiciary is known to > take it as its predominant duty to protect the rights of criminals and > terrorists. Even while our police officials could be mowed down by > criminals, military personnel could be killed by terrorists, but judges > will be safe. With all due respect, your fears are unfounded. I can’t > resist asking, sir, is this constitution you are following based on some > gestapo document? > > Regards, > > Satya Dosapati > > https://SatyaBlog.org > > Note: Please spread the word around. Tweet it, put on Facebook, email it > and let others know. Needs everyone participation. We have a very small > window of chance to turn things around to protect this 10,000 year old most > scientific, most profound civilization. > > > http://www.satyablog.org/2022/07/24/hon-cji-ramana-please-educate-us-which-constitution-is-the-supreme-court-of-india-following/ > Copied & forwarded > Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android > <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/361740457.2291532.1658944263938%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/361740457.2291532.1658944263938%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqbpoqV%2BiHzqZVOUny6zd8ZAu%3Dk_QcT8gz%3D6gr-9brRLw%40mail.gmail.com.
