Pranam The above observations of the author is a thought process but these kinds of thoughts had been observed and nurtured in our vedas already as drug and drishya as under:
*DRIG DERISHYA PRINCIPLE IN VEDA & VIVEKA CHUDAMANI* *Verse 1: **Three Levels of Seer-Seen Relationships* [image: image.png] 1 *roopam drishyam lochanam drik, **Form **is the seen, the eye is the seer;* 2 *tat drishyam drik tu maanasam; **that eye is the seen, and mind is its seer;* 3 *drishyaa dhee-vrittayah saakshee **thoughts in the mind are seen by the Witness* 4 *drik eva na tu drishyate. **which alone is the Seer, but can never be seen.* in order of rising importance, they are: i) *Roopam *– “*form*”, referring to all the physical sense objects of this universe. ii) *Lochanam *– “*the eye*”, which stands for all the five sense organs of perception. iii) *Manas *– “*the mind*”, which includes the entire inner equipment called Antahkarana (mind, intellect, memory and Ego). iv) *Sakshee *– “*the Witness*”, refers to the Atman or supreme Self or Brahman, the universal Self. This is the highest principle in Vedanta. *The Seer and the Seen Relationships* The above four levels are linked by three relationships of the nature of the seer and the seen. The seer is always at the higher level from the seen. The relationships are: *1 *i) *The object/eye relationship: *This is detailed in verse 2. *2 *ii) *The eye/mind relationship: *This is detailed in verse 3.6 *3 *iii) *The mind/Sakshee relationship: *This is detailed in verse 4. *4 *The inner Witness does not have any principle higher than It to relate to. Thus theSakshee cannot ever become a ‘seen’ object of any other ‘seer’. The qualities of the Saksheeare detailed in verse 5. Extrapolated from this verse are the following *Six Principles *which govern all of thesethree ‘seer-seen’ relationships. The first four have the status of being Laws: *SIX PRINCIPLES FOR SEER-SEEN RELATIONSHIP* *i) The seer and the seen are always different from each other.* *ii) The seer is always inside; the seen is outside.* *iii) The seer is one; the seen are many.* *iv) The seer is ‘sentient’; the seen, in relation to it, is ‘inert’.* *v) Neither the seer nor the seen can see itself.* *vi) The same thing cannot be both seer and seen at the same time.* *Inertness *in this context does not mean being immobile, having no life, etc, as it is commonly understood. ‘Inert’ here is a technical word referring to the ‘seen’ in relation to the ‘seer’. Other words used in its place are ‘insentient’ (when its seer is considered to be ‘sentient’) and ‘object’ (when its seer is considered to be ‘subject’). The next 3 verses deal with each of the three types of seer/seen relationships, taken one at a time. The word *Ekadhaa *(“*remaining the same*”) is highlighted in each verse. KR IRS 31822 On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 08:53, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > -- > *Mar**Subject Matter Observing the Observer* > > > > A library must have two sections. In the first section shall be the usual > books, computers etc, the second section must consist of totally free > nature without human interference. > > In the first section consisting of books and computers, the student > struggles to note what is written, struggles to convert the notes into > observation, and if he/she is lucky may even convert the observation into > the hormonal communication, which very rarely happens. Most students half > note, try to memorize and after the examination usually feel happy to > forget, as the lesson becomes a trigger of unpleasant tension where the > student re-lives the examination tension. The Universities slaughter them > with low grades. The student clutches to the Degree or Diploma certificate > awarded by the University as it becomes the economic lifeline, to join the > society of economic man, where the rule is by the economic man, for the > economic man and of the economic man. An economic man is a Newtonian > mutation of the natural man, a member of the Biosphere, but without > emotions and behaves and functions like a machine. The economic man shuns > ecology, and becomes amenable to mathematical reduction and can be made > into the demand curve, supply curve, revenue curve, cost curve etc and one > can forget the introduction chapter of economics where the protest is that > economics is a study of the ordinary man in his ordinary mechanized life, > the adjective mechanized being muted. All Universities are busy creating > and manufacturing economic man out of the ordinary man, who has the basic > defect of being emotional or non mechanical. > > Now I daydream, that at least one University can be deviated from the > technological trance. Then that University will start another section in > its library for free nature. In free nature all organisms breathe smell > messages from the other organisms, exhale smell responses to the other > organisms, the air being filled with smell communications. The subject > matters observe and interact with the observers converting the observer > also into a subject matter. Every subject matter also observes. > > In this section of the library, the student will have no books or > computers. He has to breathe; smell and sense. His hormonal communication > system actively participates in this library section. Lessons embed into > the emotional profile. > > The biggest problem with this section of the library is, that the learning > by breathing there remains abstract and often unlanguageable. But in this > Library, nature or God gets voice. > > YM > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqnOnz9NMcgB2OCxJpJ6L-z5WLT-e8Mw2XmhL%3D8Mx5FsQ%40mail.gmail.com.
