My God,what a mastery,with vast learning always available instantly not untraceable in deep memory,your conscious digging out everything in your unconscious.You simply bettered and embellished my simple essay.In awe YM
On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 9:52 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: > Very interesting! VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE SPECTRUM > > 1 Dialectical Materialism is *a way of understanding reality; whether > thoughts, emotions, or the material world*. Simply stated, this > methodology is the combination of Dialectics and Materialism. The > materialist dialectic is the theoretical foundation of Marxism (while being > communist is the practice of Marxism). The basic tenets of dialectical > materialism are: *that everything that exists is material and is derived > from matter*; that matter is in a process and constant change; and that > all matter is interconnected and interdependent. The Three Laws of > Dialectical Materialism are: *Law of unity and struggle of opposites.* *Law > of transformation from quantity to quality.* *Law of Negation of Negation*. > The theory of dialectical materialism exhibits the same *inner unity, > organic interconnections, and systematic character* as the various > subdivisions of material reality it represents in thought. Its ideas have > been derived from a comprehensive study of natural, social and intellectual > processes and relations. And dialectical philosophy, itself, is nothing > more than the mere reflection of this process in the thinking brain." > > 2 Thus, according to Marx, dialectics is "*the science of the > general laws of motion both of the external world and of human thought*". > Dialectical materialism is a theory that states historical and political > events are a result of the conflict of social forces and are interpretable > as a series of contradictions and their solutions, while historical > materialism is a theory that locates historical change in the rise of class > societies and the way people with idealism or materialism. " The opposite > of the dialectic is *the isolated*. *consideration of things and the > consideration of them only in their fixity*." *Dialectical materialism* is > a philosophy of science > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_science>, history > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_history>, and nature > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_(philosophy)> developed in Europe > and based on the writings of Karl Marx > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx> and Friedrich Engels > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Engels>.[1] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism#cite_note-1>[2] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectical_materialism#cite_note-2> Marxist > dialectics <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic#Marxist_dialectic>, > as a materialist philosophy, emphasizes the importance of real-world > conditions and the presence of contradictions within things, in relation to > but not limited to class <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_(social)>, > labor <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_economics>, and socioeconomic > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socioeconomics> interactions. This is in > contrast to the idealist Hegelian dialectic > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic#Hegelian_dialectic>, which > emphasizes the observation that contradictions in material phenomena could > be resolved by analyzing them and synthesizing a solution whilst retaining > their essence. Marx supposed that the most effective solution to the > problems caused by said contradictory phenomena was to address and > rearrange the systems of social organization > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_organization> at the root of the > problems. > > 3 The three substantive issues that the response raises are the > following: First, what is the relationship between dialectical materialism > and other philosophical trends, ranging from idealism to mechanical > materialism to scientific realism, both in their classical or contemporary > forms . Second, what is the relationship between the categories of > philosophy and the categories of science in the perspective of dialectical > materialism? Third, what role does dialectical materialism play or rather > should play in the actual concrete development and advance of the specific > sciences or the resolution of specific contradictions in the sciences, the > case in point here being that of the issues relating to quantum mechanics? > > 4 Philosophical *idealism *is *only* nonsense from the stand-point > of crude, simple, metaphysical materialism. From the standpoint of > *dialectical* materialism, on the other hand, philosophical idealism is a > *one-sided*, exaggerated development of one of the features, aspects, > facets of knowledge, into an absolute, *divorced* from matter, from > nature, apotheosised. Idealism is clerical obscurantism. True. But > philosophical idealism is (“*more correctly*” and “*in addition*”) a > *road* to clerical obscurantism *through* *one of the shades* of the > infinitely complex *knowledge* (dialectical) of man. One may also > consider the issue of whether developments in bourgeois philosophical > viewpoints come to a halt, or are of no further value, after the rise of > dialectical materialism. There is a sense in which in the sciences such > as economics, one may talk of a vulgar approach, that persists in the study > of appearances, even when the essence has begun to be understood. This of > course does not mean that bourgeois economic theory continues to offer no > lessons, especially as it attempts to grapple with the contradictions of > capitalism. In similar fashion, it would be incorrect to assume that > developments in other philosophical viewpoints would come to a halt, > especially when the growth of knowledge in the sciences of nature and > society continues at a dramatic pace, raising new questions and challenges > for human thought. To give a common example from contemporary debates, > one may consider the question of uncertainty and decision-making under > uncertainty in the context of climate change or other environmental > questions. > > 5 *Even more significantly, between the study of the natural world > and the study of the social world, appearance or necessity* may have > quite specific and varying content in specific contexts. Thus, if we wish > to understand necessity, for instance, as a general dialectical category, > we cannot simply be satisfied with one particular meaning from one > particular science. Categories like necessity and appearance belong to the > category of dialectics. However, it is equally true, that from a broader > definition of what is necessity and how it is related to other categories, > we cannot therefore infer how necessity would be manifest in any specific > science or class of phenomena. That is something that has to be inferred *by > specific work in the specific science. Then dialectical Materialism, is > not a communist angular vision which alone can be progressive; also > Capitalism alone can neither be a rogressive thought; yet geographical > desire of contest between necessity and the appearances , do alter the > NATURE as well as many matter spread as wings at large. * > > 6 And the dialectical Materialism is also science of philosophy > tagged by Newton and Einstein, dragging the quantum mechanics too, > envisaged by a communist Takada, which ultimately determine the Faux-pox of > the matter in the nature. This situation calls for the defence of > dialectical materialism. In this case, we examine the postulates on the > basis of which mathematics inexorably draws the conclusions about > space-time around such an object. One postulate, of course, is that the > general theory of relativity is absolutely valid even in the situations > where matter is assumed to have densities which have never been dealt with > observationally, and no occasion has been present where the principle of > equality of internal mass and gravitational mass has been tested in such > circumstances. Another postulate is the so-called energy condition, which > is at the basis of all the theorems on black holes. We shall not go into > details (Please see *DRQ*). But let us take the first assumption about > the absolute validity of the General Relativity. Einstein’s grand idea > that gravitating matter determined the geometry of space-time, but insisted > that gravitational fields should be material fields having conservation > laws like the electromagnetic and other fields. Their theory called the > relativistic theory of gravitation (RTG) does not require the assumption > of island universes. Technically, the RTG has four equations in addition to > the field equations generally called the Einstein-Hilbert equations. Hence > there is no need for additional assumptions. In this theory, RTG, the > gravitational field is a physical field with a conservation law. It cannot > be switched off by a choice of coordinates since it is a material substratum. > It describes the entire body of gravitational experiments, and shows that > Einstein’s formula for gravitational waves follows directly from the > theory. Most important for the present discussion is that gravitational > collapse does not lead to infinite contraction of matter. In the RTG > there are no black holes, for there can be no objects having radius less > that a certain quantity related to their mass. There are no objects in > which the gravitational collapse results into black holes. Nature had the > wings of its own. > > 7 From the above discussion we see that ( 1 ) dialectical > materialism is not demolished by the new discoveries of science, even > though every important discovery is sought to be presented in such a way > that idealist philosophy is reinforced. But let us take these laws of > dialectics a little further. Lenin’s law of the inexhaustibility of ( 2 ) > nature should lead one to the law that matter in *motion* is > inexhaustible. Lenin deals with Hegel’s *Book on the Doctrine of Essence*. > He quotes marginally that what Hegel says about infinite movement of being > is of “objective significance”, and he quotes: “*Essence…is what it is…by > virtue of its own infinite movement of Being*.” (*Collected Works *Volume > 38). Inexhaustibility of motion would mean that ( 3 ) by withdrawing > energy it would not be possible to reduce matter to a state of > motionlessness, where the internal motion is zero. ( 4 ) This immediately > suggests the possibility of inexhaustible reservoirs of energy in nature. > Here it may be pointed out that the present theories of the nuclei of > galaxies are not able to account for the tremendous outbursts of energy > from these nuclei. > > 8 Gravitational fields appear to be seats of tremendous amounts of > energy. This is reflected in the *negative sign *we give to the potential > energy of gravitation. The Hoyle-Narlikar theory relates the formation of > new galaxies to the withdrawal of energy from this negative reservoir of > energy. While discussing the C-field in his book *The Nature of the > Universe*, Narlikar gives the argument as to why they took it as a > negative field. From a negative field if we withdraw energy, the field > does not get exhausted but becomes even more negative. In algebra, if > from *negative 5 *we take away 2, it becomes *negative 7*. So we get out > 2 as a positive quantity, without affecting the negativity of the source! > The concept of *negative energy *is also used in some of the theories of > the positron, and also in the calculation by Hawking regarding the way > energy is withdrawn from a black hole through pair production. Similarly, > in the work of Unruh as well as the recent work of Laura Mersini-Houghton, > the concept of pressure of the negative Hawking radiation is used. *Negative > energy, it appears, reflects the infinity of motion of matter.* > > 9 At any given moment a person comes under the influence of both > subterranean processes and the cosmic environment. In a very subtle way he > reflects in himself, in his functions the slightest oscillations occurring > in nature. Electromagnetic radiation alone from the sun and stars may be > broken down into a large number of categories, which are distinguishable > from one another by their wavelength, the quantity of energy they emit, > their power of penetration, and the good or harm they may do us. During the > periods of peak solar activity we observe a deterioration in the health of > people suffering from high blood pressure, arteriosclerosis or infarction > of the myocardium. Disturbances occur in the nervous system and the blood > vessels are more liable to suffer from spasms. At such times the number of > road accidents increases, and so on. It has been noted that there is a > dependence between any weakening in the Earth's magnetic field and > acceleration of growth, and vice versa, growth is retarded when the > magnetic field becomes stronger. The corpuscular, radioactive irradiations, > cosmic dust, and gas molecules which fill all universal space are also > powerful creators and regulators of human existence in biological life. The > universe is in a state of dynamic balance and is constantly receiving > various forms of energy. Some forms are on the increase or decrease, while > others experience periodic fluctuations. Each of us is a sensitive > resonator, a kind of echo of the energy flows of the universe. So it would > be quite wrong to regard only the energy of the sun as the source of life > on earth and humanity as its highest manifestation. The energy of distant > cosmic bodies, such as the stars and the nebulae, have a tremendous > influence on the life of man as an organism. For this reason our organisms > adjust their existence and development to these flows of external energy. > The human organism has developed receptors that utilise this energy or > protect themselves from it, if it is harmful. It may be said, if we think > of human beings as a high-grade biological substance, that they are > accumulators of intense energy drives of the whole universe. We are only a > response to the vibrations of the elemental forces of outer space, which > bring us into unity with their oscillations. Every beat of the organic > pulse of our existence is coordinated with the pulse of the cosmic heart. > Cosmic rhythms exert a substantial influence on the energy processes in the > human organism, which also has its own rhythmic beat. > > *10 Man's influence on nature.* Man is not only a dweller in nature, > he also transforms it. From the very beginning of his existence, and with > increasing intensity human society has adapted environing nature and made > all kinds of incursions into it. An enormous amount of human labour has > been spent on transforming nature. Humanity converts nature's wealth into > the means of the cultural, historical life of society. Man has subdued and > disciplined electricity and compelled it to serve the interests of society. > Not only has man transferred various species of plants and animals to > different climatic conditions; he has also changed the shape and climate of > his habitation and transformed plants and animals. If we were to strip the > geographical environment of the properties created by the labour of many > generations, contemporary society would be unable to exist in such primeval > conditions. > > 11 Man and nature interact dialectically in such a way that, as society > develops, man tends to become less dependent on nature directly, while > indirectly his dependence grows. This is understandable. While he is > getting to know more and more about nature, and on this basis transforming > it, man's power over nature progressively increases, but in the same > process, man comes into more and more extensive and profound contact with > nature, bringing into the sphere of his activity growing quantities of > matter, energy and information. > > 12 All the above cannot be grasped so easily by walking into nature, > without reading the nature from spacetime, to gravity, Gr, to philosophy to > human desires. Quantum mechanics is the nature; negative energy is also > the nature; minus plus 2 can be minus 7 increased negative factor is also > the energy devoured by the natural black hole is also the NATURE, and > looking at it with 0,0037% angular view around the paltry place in the vast > Dandakaranya is, not only causing injustice in living, but also telling the > nature , that I alone am protecting you lest yo may fall; the nature would > smile at us. > > KR IRS 18922 > > > > > > > > On Sun, 18 Sept 2022 at 08:13, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> -- >> *Mar**From the Visible to the Invisible* >> >> >> >> When you enter the arena of rapture, enlightenment and deep insights, you >> no longer see. You enter the abstract world of the invisible, and the >> visible becomes the invisible. The air no longer will be inanimate gas, but >> the ocean of rapture and inhalation becomes inspiration. The troposphere >> becomes rivers and rivers of emotions. Living becomes living in >> art-singing, dancing, tuning, drawing, painting, playing, simply living in >> exhilarating revelations. The troposphere converses with you with smells, >> aromas, fragrances, all messages that trigger your internal hormonal >> communication, via the bloodstream. Your internal hormonal communication >> becomes the extension of the troposphere, converting you into the planet >> earth, as a functioning limb of the earth. >> >> The visible spectrum has shackled us into seeing just 00.0037% of the >> reality, making us unaware of the arena of feeling. You go on reading and >> reading books, but you just do not try to feel. And you are madly >> destroying nature itself leaving nothing to feel. And you are blocking your >> entrance into the real world, the world of the abstract, understanding by >> feeling. You get paralyzed to just noting without feeling and you become >> busy filling the subconscious memory with the notes. The notes do not >> trigger the hormonal communication within you. They just get shelved in >> your Hippocampus as dry memories. >> >> In free, lush, thick and luxuriant nature, the continuous smell messages >> of rapture, convert the visible spectrum into the ability to see only the >> happy and wonderful things. The visible spectrum becomes the switch that >> takes you to the rapture filled invisible spectrum of feelings. >> >> A healthy body automatically takes you to heaven. An unhealthy body takes >> you to hell. And when you become the macro body, as part of free, lush and >> thick and happy nature, your hormones develop the habit of sending rapture >> filled messages, making every cell in your body very active. And you exhale >> happy messages, making the other organisms inhale your happy messages. You >> convert the troposphere into rivers and rivers of happy emotions, and >> understanding automatically connects only to the happy concept base >> paradigms. >> >> Imagine what we are doing to ourselves when we are destroying nature so >> completely today. All of us are suffering from the mind filled with very >> unhappy neurons, making our electromagnetic connection to the cosmos the >> unhappy connection. We are making the quantum entanglement the quantamized >> unhappiness at a speed several times the speed of light. >> >> Cut a tree and trigger the quantum entanglement of sorrow. A small pin >> prick on your skin makes your body shiver. Same is the case with the >> Universe. What is happening to you affects the Universe. >> >> It is for every University to initiate the alternative method of >> perception based on breathing, smelling and sensing. >> >> YM >> > -- *Mar* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJwtsiLZd3gaMonhh2nw%2BQiEECE%2BxSrVf8wdmGB_eOK1Q%40mail.gmail.com.
