As recorded from a member this video makes a meaningful declaration, in those who defy the constitution or remain lethargic. ; " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFwqBmk5YgQ. Now there are incidents spread simultaneously by ingredients who wish for power only, in acting against the Bharatha varsha dharmic principles, as opposed to the BJP!!!. It is disheartening to make such statements, as, the statements of the oppositions look like, calling your own mother a prostitute. The effect of Islaam and christianity infusions, are similar to all buddhism, Jainism and etc etc since all have the same blood group and DnA of the mother christened by the British as HINDUISM. Stalin and alike started debating that even in those ancient eras there were no ONE NATION, ONE LANGUAGE ETC. It is true in one sense. However, many smaller kingdoms were ruled over by the biggest monarchies which shall not be forgotten, as today's central and state govt so the smaller states are conditionally independent which SC will not deny ,as they are governed only by the INDIAN CONSTITUTION. iN ANCIENT TIMES, ALL THE STATES WERE BOUND BY THE CONSTITUTION CALLED THE DHARMA' SANATANA DHARMA AND SAMSKRITHAM, THOUGH SEVERAL KINGDOMS, 56 EXACTLY AS IN MAHABHARATHAM, WITH FEW SPOKEN AND UN-WRITABLE LANGUAGES. The Tamil medavis do accept that ayyar is the tamil word AYYAN meaning the worshippers of AYAN THE BRAHMAN FROM WHOSE FACE WERE BORN. BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWERS OF THE SMRITHIS THEY WERE ADDRESSED AS SMARTHAS. SMARTHAS INCLUDED ALL THE DEITY WORSHIPPERS AS FOUND IN THE FIRST BOOK OF THE EARTH (WHICH IS ALSO ACCEPTED) THE RIG VEDA, WHERE STARTING FROM AGNI, INDRA, RUDRAN DEVI, SARSWATI AND VISHNU , GANAPATYA GANAPATI (NOT TODAY'S pILLAYAR) SKANDAN MANY DEITIES WERE REQUESTED BY THE AYANS OR SMARTHAS TO REGULATE THE NATION AND THE PEOPLE; INCIDENTALLY, EVERY KINGDOM DID IT; AND SO ALL THE KINGDOMS WERE UNITED BY THE SANATANA DHARMA CONSTITUTION WHICH STALIN LIKE SHALL NOT FAIL TO REMEMBER. Some are citing conveniently Ramayanam valmiki to say Rama crossed many kingdoms down south and they were not ruled by Rama. Fundamentally ruling by a king through war is one thing; though the acceptance as a lead is another and many kingdoms accepted Ayodhya and rama as their king is revealed in Valmiki Ramayanam; Even Guhan is a small king; Vali and Sugreeva too; Many areas of south were forests area unlike the north India, and there were only hardly 16 kingdoms apart from 4 kingdoms outside, today's India as a foriegn, and Rama ruled 56 kingdoms above narmada. Out of the 16 in the south South Orissa and North of AP of Today was the Dravidam ( not even AP or TN fully after 500 BCE ) and kishkinda etc were nearly 4 kingdoms which did not exist then but did exist partly during Mahabharata 3100 BCE and real only after 500 BCE. If so, how DMK say Rama crossed in the south many kingdoms not belonging to him?; neither read history nor Ramayanam. It is another thinking whether Sri Lanka was near Orissa at present and drifted down later and Ravana was born in UP of present day etc. Mahendra Giri could have one in Orissa today also. Hence Bharatha varsha did exist and many kingdoms as states today were obeying the central Ruler. One nation concept is feasible and Mr Modi is doing something right earnestly. KR IRS 121022
On Wed, 12 Oct 2022 at 08:48, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFwqBmk5YgQ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqbsHEsAhVjpk%2Bh%3DyXj7%2Bh5ei5bC12PLabdkv4_E28Ajg%40mail.gmail.com.
