Q There was a time when a student’s merit was evaluated on the basis of his capacity to smell,sense,feel and express his feelings in sentences,poems,songs,dances,sculpture etc,the student partnered with nature. The partnership was lifelong. Every other life form partnered with him, emotionally via, breathing, smelling and sensing. Both the student and nature benefited. The subjects were discovered from nature, or there was the feeling of revelation or predication, with a space-time (verb) or experience identity tag. KR A laudable thinking but an utopia to implement where , these practices, would be costlier affair, in comparison, to the institutional teachings; aranyas are outside the residential belts; and garden cities cannot run the class in the gardens as the sound proof does not exist which would put down the nature 20%. . We were civilised when we were inside the forest; but the historian called it BARBARIC; and we did teach those to the past and the present and maybe in future also. Did we lie? Or will it be easier to change all those assimilations and write off?. The anguish is right but the method is wrong. Teach the kids to post graduates to take care of the souls in nature; train them; add extra curricular activity to pass out; as a soldier does salute as a machine, those shall become the nature protector as Ramaling adigalar sang Vadiya Payirai kanda.........Even then the spike will not go as self-preservation is the utmost task of the majority under a group of ku klux khan motions. KR IRS 051222
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 09:22, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > -- > *Mar*Relating to Environment > > > > There was a time when a student’s merit was evaluated on the basis of his > capacity to smell,sense,feel and express his feelings in > sentences,poems,songs,dances,sculpture etc,the student partnered with > nature. The partnership was lifelong. Every other life form partnered with > him, emotionally via, breathing, smelling and sensing. Both the student and > nature benefited. The subjects were discovered from nature, or there was > the feeling of revelation or predication, with a space-time (verb) or > experience identity tag. Then environment meant the flora, fauna and the > invisible spectrum. The day today life was emotional, and the ordinary man > did not live business of life. The day today emotions of life crystallized > into sentences, as revelations. Discoveries meant seeing new things > existing in nature, but revelations were emotional embedment. Nature was > sacred, God. > > Today, the environment is getting changed continuously. Every other > organism of the Biosphere is enslaved and taken for granted with absolutely > no status as a complementing emotional and perception partner. The > organisms are subjected to all sorts of experimentation, artificial > development of new mutations, continuous extinctions, and without even > being aware the human is cyborging himself, dependent on technology with > natural organs getting frozen because of non use. Many muscles are getting > frozen, leading to frozen limbs, the frozen hand, and the frozen or > handicapped leg etc. > > The very faculty of revelations from nature is being scoffed and > lampooned; the pejorative being that it is unscientific (unmechanical).Now > there is a hectic attempt to go to the Moon and other planets. Without > announcing, there is attempt to genetically change the future space > travelers. There are also attempts to develop new human mutations that suit > the natural environments of those heavenly bodies. > > The natural environment has already been changed or damaged. Understanding > means connecting to conceptual bases which develop from nature, by feeling > nature. But when the natural symbiosis is disturbed, damaged and destroyed, > one cannot breathe the factory fumes, smell, sense, feel and conceptualize. > Antibiosis is driving out the natural symbiosis. The development of > Symbiotic Economics against the waves of antibiosis is a very daunting > task. The day today economics is today dependent on machines, machines that > destroy nature, which means the other organisms. > > Symbiotic economics is actually emotional economics. But machines cannot > be emotional partners and Complementations. > > Machines are destroying nature. But most Universities are engaged in > promoting and developing new technologies, which automatically wound nature. > > Can we hope that at least one University will take up the cause of the > Biosphere as an essential emotional complement? > > YM > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopgWU041gCNBTXrBwBgLVsZ12s4y56fYPmeOCxgb7sWsA%40mail.gmail.com.
