TNCR wrote: https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/reso/028/01/0117-0126 1 Genetic diversity as spoken through Darwin had a lot to discuss about. DNA is a factor 23 elements contributing to billions of architectures. The theory of all came from something from a singularity in 13.5 billion years of evolution AND 5 MILLION YEARS OF HUMAN AGE IS INCOMPREHENSIBLE. 8000 neanderthal samples and 2 factor od DNA , from various aged fossils , may create a story cognitively; but whether it is so is a question remaining unanswered; there is a smoke on the hill, therefore it is there some fire is a good logic; (Adi Shankara) ; but my grandson asked suppose there were fog or dust then also the perception ,might show the smoke. So Science having floated a constitution cannot say anything ,other than , what is reasonable, as a child tells a story. It is good to hear. But where some forefathers spoke similar situations differently, who existed long before, closer to evolutionary factors existed then, CANNOT BE UNDERMINED NOT AS SCIENCE, JUST BECAUSE, THE MODERN THINK THEY WERE UNCIVILISED AND WE ARE THE ONES. 2 This is also Modern truth today seen:"*Does the Universe expand faster than light?*
Does the Universe's expansion violate Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which says that the speed of light is an absolute limit? Our Universe is huge. In each and every direction on the sky, powerful telescopes observe galaxies <https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/a-guide-to-galaxies/> whose light took more than 10 billion years to arrive at Earth. But wait – if we receive such ancient light from two opposite directions, and if the Big Bang <https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/questions-about-big-bang/> happened ‘just’ 13.8 billion years ago, does that mean that the Universe is expanding faster than light? And wouldn’t that violate Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which says that the speed of light <https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/speed-of-light/> is an absolute limit? The answer may surprise you. But first, we need to take a closer look at the expansion of the Universe. We know that the Universe is expanding because galaxies appear to speed away from each other – their mutual distances are continuously increasing. We can observe this through the phenomena known as redshift <https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/space-science/redshift/>. But cosmic expansion shouldn’t be pictured as galaxies racing through empty space at incredibly high velocities. Instead, it is empty space itself that expands, pushing the galaxies ever further away from each other. A useful comparison to help you imagine this scenario is to think about how a loaf of raisin bread rises in an oven. Although individual raisins don’t travel around through the dough, they nevertheless end up further away from each other as the dough expands during the baking process. You get the picture: the dough is empty space; the raisins are the galaxies. Even if galaxies don’t move around at all, their mutual distances will grow because of the expansion of space. Nearby galaxies appear to recede at a slower pace than more distant ones. In other words, cosmic expansion doesn’t have one single velocity. If you really want to express it in kilometres per second, you need to know what distance you are referring to. It’s much more useful to quantify the expansion velocity of the Universe as a relative growth rate. It turns out that space is expanding pretty slowly: at present, cosmic distances increase by just 0.007% in one million years. Does the Universe expand faster than light? Well, that depends on the scale you’re looking at. Suppose two galaxies in opposite directions on the sky are 20 billion lightyears apart. At the current growth rate of the Universe, their distance will increase by 0.007% (corresponding to 1.4 million lightyears) in one million years, which is clearly faster than light. This rate has changed a bit over the lifetime of the Universe. So, yes, for really large distances you could say that the Universe is expanding faster than light. But Einstein wouldn’t mind. His cosmic speed limit only refers to the motion of physical objects through space, from one point in the Universe to some other point. So in general, the expansion of space has nothing to do with moving objects, and is in no way limited by the velocity of light. 3 Last 4 lines will show that modern science lso calls the theory of Einstein incorrect. Space is not limited to one milky way known to us. Many in hide-vision, may lengthen, the Pancha bhuta gae by 550 Trillion years ultimately from 13.5 billion one day. Then the old version would be recognised as science. The Aryan theory was floated by scientists only to convince the african migrations, set with DNA samples , to tag the whole earth; but europe cannot find the best DNA african match; even in matching of the DNAs, all 23 elements are not Parallel, but only a single, 2 or 3 elements, which finds a similar places in other fossils of the distance Kenya or Australia. But the Chinese sample is different. Aryan theory was proved wrong and the world had to accept it. And as per para 2 if the multiverses co-exited and still there is space to expand without clashes, we are looking through the Hubble spending billions , only our next door and getting a theory applying as if the truth, for a trillion years!!. When someone does not eat my masala dosa why would I have to eat his pizza is my humble question.?. KR IRS 26123 On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 02:56, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/reso/028/01/0117-0126 > > https://www.ias.ac.in/listing/articles/reso/028/01 > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop6OSDYS40CzQOo6ejF1QWH3uYE0Bks-7GXMJysW6dVZQ%40mail.gmail.com.
