A nice argument for the preservation of nature.  Nature is matter part of
Purusha, termed as Prakrithi. Its like canvass or precondition for the
action or karma or work.  Matter is extended and rescued and sucked back by
the purusha, hence there is no creation at all; all were in existence where
the existence of purusha along with the matter or Prakriti, existed,
therefore ADVAITHAM. If matter is different from Purusha then there are
more than one, hence dwaitham. In dwaitham its creation and therefore west
believed its 1st time and Madwa thought its 28th time; so God was thought
to be inaccessible. Then human is distanced from God and dvaithis hurt the
nature which is also distanced from human.  Dvaitham taught selfishness as
existence of more than one, which is MANY, and preservation of body and
nature were neglected. The Rishi Kapilar in order to ease the negativity of
the reach of GOD, devised Purusha as Brahmam which split into Purusha and
Prakrithi with the 25 elements as nature. This was termed in B G as SANKYA
YOGA. This was derailed by Buddha and Ramanujar as NIRVANA AND
VISISHTADVAITHAM.   West British termed the origin of Sanskrit or
SAMSKRITHAM emanated from PRAKRITHAM.  Kritha is doing or done; pra is pre;
sams is well; something pre-existing turned as samskritham was the baseless
find of the west. Virtually, Sanskrit said it as, spoken language and
written language -terming in Sanskrit -as Prakritham and samskritham.  All
languages have that distinction. English spoken is not that will be written
unless its dialogue contemplated in a story or novel.  West always thought
that all languages should have been spoken first and then made civilized
for the writing. That will help postponing the the gap between the
civilization of India from Greek in which ultimately succeeded, with the
help of the Indians themselves, who were ruled and given for such Rao
Bagadur etc.  It will also help to term the Vedas as Myths by many authors,
including the WENDY DONIGER LIKE.  The ancient verse of Brahmam gave the
Vedas to Brahma and so on in Sanskrit were belied. But Moses gave the 10
commandments, was accepted by all including Indians.  ONE WHO BELIEVES IN
ONENESS WILL RESPECT THE NATURE AS PER SANATHANA DHARMA, THE PATH WAY AND
NOT THE RELIGION, AS TERMED BY THE England . Since atheism was brought in
by the science of the west, Hiroshima was destroyed and nature was grounded
and so GOD; the outbreak is agnosticism, [ Thomas Henry Huxley coined the
word agnostic in 1869,], "*Spiritual but not religious*" (SBNR), also known
as "*Spiritual but not* affiliated" (SBNA), and many more. Nature *worship* is
often considered the primitive source of modern *religious* beliefs and can
be found in theism, pan-entheism, pantheism, deism, polytheism, animism,
totemism, shamanism, paganism.  VEDA RESPECTED EVERY NATURE AND SPECIE AS
VAYU, INDRA, VARUNA, AGNI, ADITI, DITI, SO ON SO FORTH, whereas, science
simply misused the science to destroy as if it can create. Net result is
today's perplexity. Mind and heart is  pragmatic know-how and emotion or
husband and wife. Mind tending to heart is seeking the Jeevatma as
realization. Science pulled them both off and tending to lot of diverse and
misbehaviour due to mis-conceptions. IN SHORT, NATURE CANNOT BE PROTECTED
WITHOUT WORSHIP OF ALL -A MYTH FRAMED BY THE WEST, MUST BE BROKEN.
 K R   dated the 2nd March 2019

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqtDuixM6-8OcmGc-N-MMqO1v0crUTwKSCMKzFS9Pvc-g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to