Sir,
There are volumes and volumes of writings by you awaiting from your pen.Why
kill your creativity and deny the benefit to people.
YM

On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 3:14 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Paradox of time II
>
>      There is a certain absurdity in the theory of the “big bang.” As the
> theory goes, all of creation is an unstable system, with matter flying
> about in different directions as a result of a gigantic explosion, which
> occurred after all matter was concentrated at a single point.
>
>     The absurdity of this is patent, just as it is in the model of
> creation where the entire universe rotates around us. Intuition, however,
> never served as a reliable guide in the world of science, especially of
> contemporary science. Anyhow, we do not aim to disprove this model. We
> accept Stephen Hawking’s point of view, which presents the universe as a
> sphere of time in which we, by virtue of our intellect, travel in the same
> direction as the arrow of time. What effect can this model have on the
> metaphysical level of time’s perception?
>
>       Time exists simultaneously from its beginning to its end, much as
> the beginning and end stations of a railroad line coexist. Intellect, whose
> system is built on consecutive perception, cannot exist and therefore, cannot
> recognize itself in any other direction besides the one moving with the
> arrow of time. (PAST, PRESENT AND THE FUTURE AND NOT THE REVERSE AS FUTURE,
> PRESENT AND THE PAST).
>
>        If so, how Big Bang is absurd. Modern science is trying to find the
> black cat, in a dark room, where it does not exist. Intellect of the past
> does not exist to remember.  Then how in presenti, the past is grouped
> into? Since only the present exists for modern science, the past that
> existed, must exist as matter is indestructible by Physics, and if so,
> where did the past go? Past is right in presenti which will become the
> past, and remain in the future to become the past, an arrow of time
> traveling in one direction only. If there is a past, present and the future
> coexisted, then is there a movement? Determining yesterday, today and
> tomorrow as time and space and as Brahmam? If you say yes, then, show me
> the yesterday by science, as well as the future to be.  If you cannot, then
> you say I can show you, “only the present second”, not even the past
> second, nor the future second. Then you will pass a dialogue that the past
> is dead; future is unknown; and the present second alone is truth. Suppose
> you cleverly can corner me, by recording the one second before by audio or
> video and try to prove the past, THEN I WILL SAY STILL WE ARE ONLY IN
> PRESENTI AT THAT SECOND, WHILE SEEING THE RECORDING, and what I am seeing
> at that second is not the past. Then what happened to that arrow of time,
> the past?
>
>      It is in the present merged.  So too that is to come will turn to the
> past and merge with that present; so, all the past, the present and the
> future are right before you; but you are misleading yourself, by time
> principle and the space principle together, as if you are aware of
> yesterday, today and maybe tomorrow also. But you will never believe the
> paradox of time, that the TIME AND SPACE NEVER MOVED AT ALL; never THE
> ARROW OF TIME WENT THROUGH AT ALL; the maya was created because, that the
> belief of matter in existence in presenti, always appeared to you in
> presenti, though all, existed in the past second also and will continue to
> exist in the future; or does it not? The confusion started. When the Rig
> vedam, in Nasadiya suktam said, maybe he knows or knows not, you wrote that
> I am confused. But now you are not sure of anything. That confused mind is
> MAYA.
>
>         If all the three-times rested on a dot which to your mind
> perceived as yesterday, today and tomorrow, of that concerned time, which
> again you devised, in that manner, and since you saw 7 39 01 as yesterday;
> 7 39 02 as present today and will be assuming 7 39 03 as future. Time on
> the one-way arrow is marked by your mind. But, & 39 01 which was present
> became the past; 7 39 02 which is present became the past; 7 39 03 the
> future, which became the present, also turned the past. All the past and
> present and future were existing together on a dot. How. Suppose you are in
> the midst of water where you saw the wave to your left, touched you and
> then went to the right of you, are you not in the same water? Did you
> move?  Did water move? Then where did the water you thought passed you?
> When your mind perceived the motion as an appearance so too there was an
> existing movement; but where the movements were microcosm, then nothing is
> moving. What you thought as a movement is Dvaitham the MAYA; and all at one
> time appears as existing but as also not existing. Otherwise, where the
> mind is not deceived by YOGA, and find all matter is together in purusha as
> the only existence, the rest as perceived is MAYA which is Advaitham. For
> example, you say the water is moving when I say it is not but stagnant; but
> when I say you are always in motion from birth till death as the earth is
> moving, you say, no see, I am standstill. MAYA is the Bundle of
> contradictions. All in existence is not in reality that existence.
>
>            Why the arrow of time in one direction? Many books are written
> on this in Hinduism, and strangely by west authors also. One latest book is
> THE ILLUSION OF TIME PERCEPTION BY NORIMICHI SHUTO, VERY WELL DONE BY AN
> ORDINARY LANGUAGE TEACHER OF Japan. (1965 born belonging to JIKAN NINSHIKI
> TO LU SAKKAKU). He travelled in the book with all the scientists so far
> known to this world. And in short, he says that you calculated the time as
> 7 39 00 to 7 55 00 as 16 minutes so the water flowed, the crow was flying.
> My grandson is running etc, crossing the space. So, you say the clock in
> space is the time. Suppose from 7 39 00 to 7 39 00 00 00 01th, where the
> space is null or impossible to see at all; when there is no space there is
> no movement, so time is constant. But your mind passed through without
> being able to imagine that 00 00 00 01th nano second. Thus, when you keep
> shifting that way, you will feel that you are upright though you are
> moving. So, there is no movement and time is at a standstill as well as the
> space.  That is an arrow of time where the arrow is supposed to move but is
> not moving and all the actions of the movements are happening as perceived
> by your mind. That is the time paradox. It is there but not yet. That is
> what the Adi Shankara said as MAYA, which was misunderstood by even the
> great saint Sri Ramanuja and Madwa.
>
>           Now read B G where the lord said:   aham atma gudakesha
> sarva-bhutashaya-sthitah aham adish cha madhyam cha bhutanam anta eva cha
> *BG 10.20*: O Arjun, I am seated in the heart of all living entities. I
> am the beginning, middle, and end of all beings. That is the past, the
> present and the future merging at a point as only one. Then he added, shri
> bhagavan uvacha bahuni me vyatitani janmani tava charjuna
> tanyaham veda sarvani na tvam vettha parantapa  *BG 4.5*: The Supreme
> Lord said: Both you and I have had many births, O Arjun. You have
> forgotten them, while I remember them all, O Parantapa. Here it is
> describing many truths of life. Both the Arjuna and Krishna the Brahmam,
> were together; as there is no mind shift as AJAYATHE, unborn, the existence
> was/is/will be (our mind conception) appeared to be true. But Arjunan in
> dualism, forgot, meaning, thought he was born, so he thought he was dead;
> again, born and dies; whereas all the time Arjuna was there only with the
> Brahmam. Arjuna lived continuously; but in mind it was registered as born
> and grown and dead in each birth he thought as. At home, you went through
> one door and came out through another door; and so, were you different?
> What you are able to feel, in your MAYA Mind here, you are unable to feel
> as THE SAME, but registered as birth and death. When some child identifies
> the place he or she lived by only remembering, you’re walking through one
> door and coming out like. Hence all exist but do not exist. (Someone was
> asking in the FB about this) Time and space are one and the same and remain
> at a standstill, but appear to move faster or slower than many things. K R
> IRS   4 6 23
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
*Mar*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCJ8m_Z%2BGwh8vFegrGrwD2S1Bt5hpw_To4zoqfQx%3D7dmiQ%40mail.gmail.com.
  • Time paradox 2 Rajaram Krishnamurthy
    • Re: Time paradox 2 Markendeya Yeddanapudi

Reply via email to