-- *Mar*What is Answer?
An answer is basically feeling and not some technological adjustment or a mathematical equation. It is the feeling of oneness with nature, where the flow of feelings from the air, blends smoothly with one’s perception. One’s own flow of predication must agree with the flow of predication from nature. The predication expands one’s own horizon, continuously when one adopts the method of meditation or the method of feeling nature. Is feeling nature essentially gravitation? Do answers gravitate into the perceiver? An answer embeds into one’s internal hormonal communication, giving the cells feeds from nature. The reach of understanding of the predications, expands continuously, the horizon of perception, becoming the gists that flow into the perceiver. Does the perceiver ultimately big bang own enlightenment as expression? Does he suffer from the shortage or absence of suitable words? The perceiver is wading into the abstract and invisible arena, but has to find words that suit the visible arena or the visible spectrum. Is the Big bang from Singularity also expression of enlightenment? A Black Hole continuously eats galaxies after galaxies. Does it reduce itself ultimately into a Singularity and then Big bang? At the center of every galaxy there is a Black Hole. There are also independent Black Holes that have completed their meal, becoming tiny and tiny on their evolution into a Singularity. Are Big bangs meeting Big bangs in the Universe, creating Multiverses? On a smaller scale on our most beautiful home, earth, are predications meeting predications in the air? Are individual perceptions exhaled into the air, which are inhaled by the various organisms, ultimately leading to Big bangs of expression of enlightenment? Now, what sort of enlightenments are we smelling? We are killing nature continuously and calling it economic life. As it is we are employing machines to perform the functions of our limbs making the limbs redundant and thus damaging the limb’s participation in the internal hormonal communication. Your internal hormonal communication complements the smell communications in the troposphere. Now we are poisoning the land, water and air and calling it development. Are we not damaging the very capacity of nature to give answers? After all, all answers are ultimately obtained from nature. We have to smell and feel them. But when we breathe and smell poisons, are not answers also poisoned? Your research is supposed to give you answers. But when the answers are poisoned? Now, what are we to do when every University is galloping towards the ultimate suicide-AI? YM -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKRHZtqVfF%3DQdUwrya1DDk9Q8CELrD1n8Q%2Brht2jLsaVg%40mail.gmail.com.
