---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: 'N Sekar' via iyer123 <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, Jan 23, 2024, 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [iyer123] COMEDY OF ERRORS
To: Iyer <[email protected]>, Kerala Iyer <
[email protected]>, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]>,
Chittanandam V. R. <[email protected]>, Mathangi K. Kumar <
[email protected]>, Venkat Giri <[email protected]>, Gopa4411 <
[email protected]>, Laxminarayan Sarma <[email protected]>,
Jambunathan Iyer <[email protected]>, Vanakkam Subbu <[email protected]>,
SRIRAMAJAYAM <[email protected]>, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]>


Sri Narayanaswamy Sir,

Pranams.

Pl excuse me if you find this offensive and let me assure you my intention
is not that BUT to put forth my views only- as I feel your views on the so
called " brahmanas" should not go unanswered.

Hope you will take this in that spirit.

I don't normally respond to your posts as I know what to expect
BUT
Let me say what I have said below and  hope any rebuttal will be in a
civilized language and on the CONTENTS AND CONTENTS ONLY and do not get
personal.

I can only appeal but to heed it or not  is your prerogative.

I know nobody else here will have the courage or the inclination  to argue
against what you have written but I thought your views on the so called "
brahmanas" needs a discussion. I know others will enjoy witnessing a good
fight but will not enter the ring when we discuss a basic religious issue -
typical selfish attitude of the "brahmanas".

This is NOT a personal fight but fight for a principle and I hope readers
will bear that in mind. I do not expect any response from anyone because it
requires spine and courage and backbone to take up the gauntlet and to
stand up against the mighty and powerful. Easy way is to escape and say
"Oh, I don't discuss politics or religion" or any such nonsense and escape
any responsibility. Be that as it may.

It is one thing not to get involved in personal, mutual name calling but
quite another when we discuss principles such as your calling our respected
P M " Shudra" although I won't feel ashamed to be one such - so long as I
earn my income and am not a a parasite on society.

It will be interesting to note how many " brahmanas" take money from the so
called " shudras" for a living.

Now,

First of all let us be clear that there is hardly any "brahmana" today - we
are all Vaishyas - the moment we started selling our services for money we
ceased to be brahmanas.

Apart from what we all know of the duties of a " brahmana" like

Study Vedas
Teach Vedas
Do Yagnas
Help others in doing Yagnas
Etc.

I have also read that the other
 four basic duties of a  "brahmana" are:

" Snanam Sandhyo Japo Homa Divadhanam sa Pujanam
Adityam Vaiswadeyam Shutkarmani
Dine Dine"

Meaning
Snanam, Sandhyai, Japam, Homam (for brahmachatis Samitha Dhanam and for
Grahastas Oupasanam)
Devatha Pooja - Feeding those who visit you after performing Vaichvadeava
Karma.

Every Day.

By these definitions I know I am not qualified but wonder how many others
are there who can say HONESTLY they do all these DAILY.

It has also been added here that
" Brahmanayasya Thudhe Hoyam Nopa Bokaya Kalpathe
Iha Klesaya Mahate Prethyanastha Sukaday sa"

Meaning
 A " Brahmana" is not born to enjoy the material and physical comforts of
this world
BUT
To suffer physically to do Tapas and other Dharma karmas for the welfare of
the world AND NOT for selfish gains.

I have read this in a booklet distributed several years ago when I attended
a Yagna - I don't know Sanskrit but read it in Tamizh.

I know first hand that the Kanchi Maha Swamigal refused to give "
Theertham" to any " brahmana" who went abroad  - and this includes Kalki
Sadasivam. Kanchi Swamigal did not take it as a right thing for a "
brahmana"   to cross the seas and here also I stand disqualified as I lived
abroad. You may differ and that is your right.

He also advised all the " brahmanas" at least in the earlier periods,  to
have " Sikai" meaning " kudumi".

He strongly advocated against wearing silk sarees- Pattu pudavais and
others - I have not worn them for the last 3 decades and also refused to
buy a silk dhoti during the marriage of my only son even it meant incurring
the disclosure of so many relatives and friends.  Kanchi Swamigal said to
prepare one silk saree thousands of silk worms are put in BOILED WATER to
extract silk.

If you care to read Cho Sir's " Enge Brahmanan" you will agree that there
is not a single, repeat single brahmin today - such are the rigours of a
brahminical way of life.

I was particularly aghast that you derided Modi ji. But for him, Yogi ji
and the countless Kar Sevaks, Ram Temple would have remained a pipedream.

I bow and touch their feet with my head for their services to our religion,
traditions and culture. It is easy to be an arm chair critic but what else
have we done to even utter their names?

Fasting for 11 days with only coconut water and observing other austerities
need to be respected and not ridiculed.
Modi ji fasts for the whole day during the Navratri festibal and breaks it
only for dinner and even Obama has seen this and admired him.

1. Traditions vary across the country but what unites us is the common
Faith that is Sanatana Dharma.

So what is right for them they are entitled to do and we have no right to
comment on their practices as we will do here what we consider right.

2. What did these  our so called " Brahmanas" do for 500 years? Did they
even lift their little finger?

What sect Modi ji belongs to is none of my and should be none of anyone's
concern. He is OUR P M and has done us proud. Anyone who lives abroad like
I do,  would have witnessed the enormous respect we Indians have gained
during the last 9 years.

3. In the North they follow their customs and practices and none of us, who
never contributed to the struggle ( unlike thousands of Kar Sevaks who paid
for it with their lives) have any moral right to even prostrate before
them, leave alone criticize them.

4. If we can't be grateful, let us at least refrain from passing hurting,
insulting remarks.

5. Modi ji and Yogi ji are the CHOSEN ONES and I bow my head in gratitude
and reverence to them.

6. Just as an aside, we have seen how our so called " Brahmanas" have
conducted themselves when both
Pujya Shree Vijayendra Saraswathi Swamiji
And
Actress Nayan Dhara visited to have Darshan of
Atthi Varadar at Kanchipuram.

Thd less said the better as it is shameful to describe it here.

Krishna in the B G has said that what matters to Him is BHAKTHI AND BHAKTHI
ALONE and this had been proved in various episodes of
" Thiruvilayadal Puranams" also.

Leave alone Kannappa Nayanar, haven't we studied about Pusalar Nayanar?

Sir,

It is these so called " brahmanas" who have sold their souls when they
appear on tv shows deriding our P M, Bharat and its culture.

They even argued and still argue against Ram Temple.

1,000 years of slavery has made us " brahmanas" selfish- that somehow if we
are treated as the first amongst the slaves and get our crumbs and power
over other fellow slaves, we feel satisfied. ICS is a classic  example. We
helped the invaders rule Bharat for a few

Sirs
Rt. Honourables
Rao Bahadurs
Diwan Bahadurs
And other such
Titles

 and the crumbs that came with them.

That is how we allowed ourselves to be divided and ruled. Let us not commit
that unpardonable sin again but instead seek redemption, if we can.

Sorry Sir, my intention is not to show disrespect ( I have been brought up
to show respect even to my opponents but not to compromise on my core
beliefs and values) but only to express my views which unfortunately do not
match yours.

With respects
N Sekar


Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://mail.onelink.me/107872968?pid=nativeplacement&c=Global_Acquisition_YMktg_315_Internal_EmailSignature&af_sub1=Acquisition&af_sub2=Global_YMktg&af_sub3=&af_sub4=100000604&af_sub5=EmailSignature__Static_>

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:04 AM, Narayanaswamy Iyer
<[email protected]> wrote:

Dear folks

A grand comedy of errors was enacted at Ayodhya yesterday 22 January 2024
at the purported installation of the moola vigraham of Lord Sree
Raamachandra, as conveyed so vividly by NDTV.

I have attended and participated in various temple kumbaabhishegams and in
installations and re-installations of vigrahams.  So, I can safely say from
past experience that the entire ceremony of praana prathishta,
shodashopachaara pooja, and subsequent rites at Ayodhya was a mockery of
tradition, a violation of agama rules, and a desecration of sanctity.

First, the 130-cm tall black stone moola vigraham of Sree Raama (without
his consort Seetha Devi) but holding a golden bow in his left hand and a
golden arrow in his right hand, had its eyes staring upwards towards the
sky as if seeking the blessings of a higher Supreme Being such as Aadi
Paraashakthi.  It was not looking straight ahead at the horizon to see the
rising Sun at the east, as is normal.  It was not looking downwards at the
multitudes of devout worshippers either.

Second, there was no inclusion in the rites, rituals and ceremonies for a
portable upa vigraham for carrying the god in procession through the
streets on occasions like Sree Raama Navami, Vaikunta ekaadashi,
vaikaashi-vishaakam, and so on.

Third, the so-called praana prathishta of the moola vigraham was a grand
public display of defiance of orthodoxy.  The normal procedure would be for
competent braahmanas trained and experienced in the ritual to infuse the
spirit of the deity into theertham contained in duly decorated brass
vessels, carry the vessels in procession around the temple clockwise,
chanting appropriate manthrams, and then pouring the consecrated theertham
ceremoniously over the head of the vigraham to transfer on to it the
praana, again chanting the prescribed manthrams.

Fourth, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a confirmed shoodran, was
instead seen performing a parody of praana prathishta by sprinkling
flowers, akshatha, and water on the foot of the statue.  It was patently
obvious that he had not been previously rehearsed about what to say or do
during the various stages of the entire ceremony.  Or he had completely
forgotten.

Fifth, even presuming that dhyaana-aavaahanam was done on the statue
previously by baahmana purohithars, there was no paadyam, arkhyam,
aachamanam, snaanam, vasthroththareeya dhaaranam, yajnyopaveetha dhaaranam,
aabharana dhaaranam, parimala-gantha dhaaranam, kumkuma samarppanam,
akshatha samarppanam, notional pushppa-maalikaa samarppanam, actual
pushppa-archanaa-poojanam.

Sixth, Modi was left holding the multiple-flame mangala deepam and circling
it silently dozens of times in front of the statue, obviously without
knowing what else to do.

Seventh, for neiveidhyam, Modi offered a plate of fruits and a coconut with
kudumi.  No sign at all of the prescription paal-paayasam.

Eighth,  Modi did a single pradakshanam of the moola vigraham instead of
the traditional three pradakshanams.  He kept his mouth shut, as he had not
been taught the appropriate manthrams for the circumambulation of the
installed deity.

Ninth, the most incongruous visible aspect of the whole charade was that,
at all times, opposite to Modi, a white-whiskered, white-haired elderly man
wearing a thick black Mao-type winter coat was simultaneously offering what
appeared to be akshathas and flowers to the feet of the Sree Raama statue.

Tenth, towards the end of the whole affair, Modi was seen receiving a
kinnam of prasadams from one of the officiating assistants, and Modi
offering dakshinas in similar kinnams to various "seers" sitting on the
floor.


*Altogether, a grand shambolic travesty of tradition, and a splendorous
comedy of errors enacted on the world stage, with maximum publicity, under
the glare of giant spotlights, for the entertainment of the cognoscenti
among the viewers.*

S Narayanaswamy Iyer



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhO-Cfd-xojouMqs0MWvxkYRZ0wNxv_dwnhHEmuOXBB%2BqA%40mail.gmail.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhO-Cfd-xojouMqs0MWvxkYRZ0wNxv_dwnhHEmuOXBB%2BqA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"iyer123" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1880141287.1347504.1706007388553%40mail.yahoo.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1880141287.1347504.1706007388553%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CABC81ZeRUE2Vy41PnCv8BSmQquaKKUe3%3DzMSLy%2BFqhycruh0Rg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to