Management theory exclusively written by Mathangi Kumar is welcome after a
long time. Leading from front and leading from behind are two types of
managers; each needed in an appropriate situation; a strange land. a
rakshasa of power , hidden guerilla war; Ramayana war was in a new
situation unknown; so in order to mitigate that fear, Rama had to lead. And
it is not for the war on requiring the land or expansion of the kingdom;
but purely a situation where one has to redeem his wife and the prestige.
Individual problems culminated in war; as  a matter of fact Anjaneya was
sent to locate seetha and if possible to advocate proper mode of action. No
enmity with any one; Ravana was advised; to send back Seetha. Had it been
done there would have been no war. However Ramavataram is only to Kill
ravana. Then Ravana must fight with only Rama to die. The war was the
apprehension of the Ravanas. Even without Monkeys Rama would have gone to
Sri Lanka. So management of individual success or failure is leading from
front; unlike that of modern war where even Brigadiers lead in front as the
success was inevitable and had to be penetrative. In companies such things
do happen where the last chance to redeem or win over or take back shall
not be lost, then even the GM may lead in front.
  On the contrary, Krishna avatharam was nort to destroy duryodhana. Nor
even to protect the modesty of Draupadi. Dharma shetre Kurushetre means
avataram in itself was to reduce many odd characters and to establish the
dharma. Krishna could have done it by one chakra. But the reasons for
annihilations could have been badly interrupted. Majority of the people
will understand a film only when fully explained through the dialogues. So
also the script writer Krishna moves many pieces of chess coins. And the
happenings shall be natural chaos. Revelation of all characters. People
will know who is who. And history blames only the Pandava kaurava as
Krishnan did nothing But Kannadasan wrote :"kannane kaattinaan; kannane
kolai seigiraan; so arjuna raise your Gandeepam; did ever any judge hanged
the culprit? So from behind Krishna operated. Many senior officials had
done that; where credit accrues it is through them; a book PRR
critic-wrote on a DGP is such; a poor constable would have staked his life
and would remain unsung. The directions issued  might not have been obeyed
by a small crew in finishing the job; if failed they are scapegoats;
victorious she is the Bharatha ratna. From behind the hero or the Heroine
gets the credits only and all debits to the scape-goats. Management is a
tricky job sir KR IRS  31 1 24

On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 22:46, 'venkat giri' via iyer123 <
[email protected]> wrote:

> *Respected Sir/s,*
>
> * SUBJECT: **Which*  *MANAGERIAL STYLE* *to adopt*
>
> *LORD RAMA or LORD KRISHNA.*..*?????*
>
> *What’s ONE’s managerial style: like Lord Ram or Lord Krishna? *
>
> *Nice one In Hindu mythology **there are two great epics.*
>
>  *One is called RAMAYAN and other is called **MAHABHARATA**. *
>
> *The centre story of both these books is around **victory** of **GOOD**
> on **EVIL**.*
>
> *In one story Lord Ram leads his army to defeat Ravana in his land,**
> while in the second Lord Krishna oversees Pandavas defeat Kauravas in the
> battle at **KURUSHEKTRA**.*
>
> *       In Ramayan, Lord Ram is the best **yodhaa **of his side.*
>
> *He leads his army from the front.  With Strategizes HE directs different
> people to do things to meet the objectives. His people are happy to follow
> orders & want to get all the appreciation for being the best executors. **Lord
> Ram sets direction & also tells people what to do during difficult times.**
> Ultimately they won the war & the final outcome was achieved.*
>
> *           On the other hand Lord Krishna* *told Arjuna, **I won’t fight
> the battle. I won’t pick up any weapon; I would only be there on your
> chariot as a charioteer.** And he did what he said. He never picked up
> the weapon & he never fought.*
>
> *Still, Pandavas won the war & final outcome was achieved**.*
>
> *So, what was different?* *It was their **managerial style** & **it was
> also the type of people who were being lead.*
>
>
>
> *LORD RAMA** was leading an army of **‘MONKEYS’* *who were not skilled
> fighters & they were looking for direction.*
>
>    *While on other hand**, LORD KRISHNA* *was leading **ARJUNA* *who was
> one of the best archers of his time**. While Lord Ram’s role was to show
> it & lead from the front, **Krishna played the role of a coach whose job
> was to remove **cobwebs **from **his protégée’s mind. **Krishna couldn't
> teach Arjuna archery but he could definitely help him see things from a
> very different perspective.*
>
> *Here are some of the basic differences in two styles**:*
>
>
>
> *LORD RAMA- A skilled warrior, lead monkeys, was emotional, gave precise
> roles & instructions, and motivated the army to fight for his cause*
>
> *LORD KRISHNA**- works with **best the professionals**, **provides
> strategic clarity**, **allows team members to take lead, fights for the
> cause of the team, **and did not depict his true emotions**.*
>
> *Look at your team/family & reflect what type of leader/parent you
> are!!!!!!!!*
>
> *One who keeps answering/solving problems for people/kids? *
>
> *Or*
>
> *Who asks relevant questions from their people/kids so that they can find
> their own solution?*
>
> *Are u someone who tells/directs all the time? *
>
> *Or*
>
> *Someone who clarifies doubts & allows their people/kids to find their own
> ways.*
>
> *Are u someone who has monkeys in the team & the way u deal with it Or u
> have the brightest experts in their area getting stuck with issues?*
>
>               *Younger generation* *doesn't want you to tell or show how
> things are to be done, **they want to know the meaning of their task and
> how it makes a difference in this world.*
>
> *They are **Arjuna**s……** who don’t necessarily seek more skill/knowledge
> but **they need someone to clarify the **cobwebs **in their mind**, if u
> still apply Lord Ram’s style on them, u are **bound to fail as a manager.*
>
>                              *On the other hand if there are people **who
> aren't skilled enough** but **rely on your expertise to sail u through* *Lord
> Ram’s style is appropriate.*
>
>             *Isn’t it **GOOD** for us to reflect & think what managerial
> style will bring the best result for us and our team/family?*
>
> *Is it Lord Ram or Lord Krishna?*
>
> *Managing Leader vs the Coaching Leader!*
>
> *​*
>
> *COURTESY: Mathangi k kumar <[email protected]
> <[email protected]>>*
>
> Regards
>
> V.Sridharan
>
> Trichy
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/416425990.1876601.1706676350883%40mail.yahoo.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/416425990.1876601.1706676350883%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZopNPH%3D_yK2i8d1VpYL2BpcU9xUHci3qcLoAoP1A6%3DV%3D%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to