Why so much delirium Narayanasamy theru porukki in singapore? You yourself
have reproduced my smart writing; and you have nothing to contribute as
usual except abuses. So that is the art of terupporukkiin singapore and you
are its captain Good. Except neti, you knew nothing; except envy and anger
that your face is ripped off=-you have nothing. So keep exposing your mean
proceedings to this society so that you will lose a small numbers in
support of you bye

On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 22:11, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear folks
>
> (1)  Was Venkat Giri Sridharan Trichy mere copying wholesale what Mathangi
> K Kumar had written elsewhere, thus blindly imitating his mentor KR
> ex-IRS  31 1 24 alias K Rajaram alias Rajaram K alias Cockroachmoorthy
> alias KARUPPAN-CHAAMI?
>
> (2)  "*Ramavataram is only to Kill ravana. Then Ravana must fight with
> only Rama to die. The war was the apprehension of the Ravanas.*"
>
> My comments:-  Wooly thinking by a disoriented crackpot numbskull?  If
> killing Raavana and "the apprehension of the Ravanas (whoever they might
> be?)" was the only purpose of Raamaa-avathaaram, then why did Sree Raamaa
> hide behind a tree and kill Baali, elder brother of Sugriva?  Why suspect
> the chastity of Seetha twice -- once causing her to leap into the fire lit
> by Raama's brother Lakshmana, and the second time causing her (fully
> pregnant with twin sons of her husband) to flee from Ayodhya and take
> refuge in a rishi's aashramam?
>
> Did not Raamaa and Lakshmana also kill the Ogress Thaadaka and other
> demons and demonesses?  Did not Raamaa blind the crow in one eye for
> mistaking Seethaa's exposed nipple for a ripe berry and trying to pick it
> away?  Did not Raamaa also kill the "golden deer" which was the demon
> Maareechaa sent by Raavana to lure Raamaa and Lakshmana away while Raavaana
> abducted Seetha?
>
> (3)  "*Dharma shetre Kurushetre means avataram in itself was to reduce
> many odd characters and to establish the dharma. Krishna could have done it
> by one chakra.*"
>
> My comments:-  Absolute rubbish by an accomplished and serial liar and an
> incompetent twister of truth.  The battlefield of Kurukshethram was merely
> the arena where followers of dharma and followers of adharma met to fight
> each other to the last.  Nothing to do with any avathaaram or "reduction"
> of unspecified "odd characters".  Krishna could not, and did not "have done
> it by one chakra".  (As a human, he had six chakras from moolaadhaara
> upwards to sahasraaraa embedded in his body.)
>
> On the other hand, Lord Sree Krishna Paramaathma interceded between the
> estranged parties -- the Kauravaas and the Paandavas -- and as a trusted
> impartial intermediary plenipotentiary, asked Duryodana to give the
> Pandavaas, who had fulfilled their sentence of years of exile and returned,
> just five villages for them to survive.  The haughty Kaurava refused.
> Krishna asked for one village.  The sneering Kaurava again refused.
> Krishna asked for five houses.  Again the contemptuous Kaurva refused, said
> he would not give one house or even one square foot of land, and told
> Krishna to get lost.
>
> Did not Krishna ask the Paandavas to name an elephant "Ashvaththaama",
> which was the name of the chiranjeevi son of Dronaachaarya (one of the top
> generals of the Kaurava army and who was about to annihilate the Paandava
> army) and then to kill it?  And did not Krishna then ask Yudhishtira, the
> eldest of the five Paandavaas and who had takena vow never to tell a lie,
> to say "Asvaththaama is dead"?  Whereupon Dronaachaarya, overcome with
> grief, laid down his arms, and Krishna asked Arjuna to shoot a deadly arrow
> which killed Dronaachaarya?  And then did not Krishna then ask Yudhishtira
> to say, "Kunjaraha", meaning it was the elephant so named which was dead?
>
> When a wheel of Duryodana's war-chariot was stuck in a deep rut and could
> not move, and Duryodana leapt down unarmed and tried to shift the wheel,
> did not Krishna ask Arjuna to shoot a deadly arrow at an unarmed combatant,
> which was against all laws of war?
>
> In the midst of the Mahaabhaaratha War, did not Krishna raise and aim his
> chakra at the Kauravas, which was a breach of the laws of which he himself
> preached?
>
> (4)  "*Even without Monkeys Rama would have gone to Sri Lanka.*"
>
> My comments:-  An iconic axiom discovered (or coined) by an incorrigibly
> stupid idiot?
>
> A bunch of Singhalese Budhhists were running Sri Lanka at the time of Sree
> Raamaa's invasion?
>
> Raamaa would have waded across the Palk Strait?  Or, he would have assumed
> a "vishva-roopam" and simply walked across?  Or, found some dried reeds,
> built a "Kontiki", and sailed across?  Or, found another Guha among the
> Ceylonese, who rowed him across?  Or, climbed the nearest hill on Tamil
> Naadoo, built a giant para-sail, and floated across on a thermal, i.e.
> rising column of hot air?  Or, caught a giant tortoise, clung to its back,
> and paddled his way across?  Or, Indra would have sent a "pushpa-vimaanam"
> to ferry him across?  Or, did a vanishing trick, and suddenly manifested
> himself on the hostile island?
>
> *Why does our notorious nonentity always succeed in putting his filthy
> foot in his mealy mouth every time he makes a smart-ass posting?*
>
> S Narayanaswamy Iyer
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:36 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Management theory exclusively written by Mathangi Kumar is welcome after
>> a long time. Leading from front and leading from behind are two types of
>> managers; each needed in an appropriate situation; a strange land. a
>> rakshasa of power , hidden guerilla war; Ramayana war was in a new
>> situation unknown; so in order to mitigate that fear, Rama had to lead. And
>> it is not for the war on requiring the land or expansion of the kingdom;
>> but purely a situation where one has to redeem his wife and the prestige.
>> Individual problems culminated in war; as  a matter of fact Anjaneya was
>> sent to locate seetha and if possible to advocate proper mode of action. No
>> enmity with any one; Ravana was advised; to send back Seetha. Had it been
>> done there would have been no war. However Ramavataram is only to Kill
>> ravana. Then Ravana must fight with only Rama to die. The war was the
>> apprehension of the Ravanas. Even without Monkeys Rama would have gone to
>> Sri Lanka. So management of individual success or failure is leading from
>> front; unlike that of modern war where even Brigadiers lead in front as the
>> success was inevitable and had to be penetrative. In companies such things
>> do happen where the last chance to redeem or win over or take back shall
>> not be lost, then even the GM may lead in front.
>>   On the contrary, Krishna avatharam was nort to destroy duryodhana. Nor
>> even to protect the modesty of Draupadi. Dharma shetre Kurushetre means
>> avataram in itself was to reduce many odd characters and to establish the
>> dharma. Krishna could have done it by one chakra. But the reasons for
>> annihilations could have been badly interrupted. Majority of the people
>> will understand a film only when fully explained through the dialogues. So
>> also the script writer Krishna moves many pieces of chess coins. And the
>> happenings shall be natural chaos. Revelation of all characters. People
>> will know who is who. And history blames only the Pandava kaurava as
>> Krishnan did nothing But Kannadasan wrote :"kannane kaattinaan; kannane
>> kolai seigiraan; so arjuna raise your Gandeepam; did ever any judge hanged
>> the culprit? So from behind Krishna operated. Many senior officials had
>> done that; where credit accrues it is through them; a book PRR
>> critic-wrote on a DGP is such; a poor constable would have staked his life
>> and would remain unsung. The directions issued  might not have been obeyed
>> by a small crew in finishing the job; if failed they are scapegoats;
>> victorious she is the Bharatha ratna. From behind the hero or the Heroine
>> gets the credits only and all debits to the scape-goats. Management is a
>> tricky job sir KR IRS  31 1 24
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 at 22:46, 'venkat giri' via iyer123 <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> *Respected Sir/s,*
>>>
>>> * SUBJECT: **Which*  *MANAGERIAL STYLE* *to adopt*
>>>
>>> *LORD RAMA or LORD KRISHNA.*..*?????*
>>>
>>> *What’s ONE’s managerial style: like Lord Ram or Lord Krishna? *
>>>
>>> *Nice one In Hindu mythology **there are two great epics.*
>>>
>>>  *One is called RAMAYAN and other is called **MAHABHARATA**. *
>>>
>>> *The centre story of both these books is around **victory** of **GOOD**
>>> on **EVIL**.*
>>>
>>> *In one story Lord Ram leads his army to defeat Ravana in his land,**
>>> while in the second Lord Krishna oversees Pandavas defeat Kauravas in the
>>> battle at **KURUSHEKTRA**.*
>>>
>>> *       In Ramayan, Lord Ram is the best **yodhaa **of his side.*
>>>
>>> *He leads his army from the front.  With Strategizes HE directs
>>> different people to do things to meet the objectives. His people are happy
>>> to follow orders & want to get all the appreciation for being the best
>>> executors. **Lord Ram sets direction & also tells people what to do
>>> during difficult times.** Ultimately they won the war & the final
>>> outcome was achieved.*
>>>
>>> *           On the other hand Lord Krishna* *told Arjuna, **I won’t
>>> fight the battle. I won’t pick up any weapon; I would only be there on your
>>> chariot as a charioteer.** And he did what he said. He never picked up
>>> the weapon & he never fought.*
>>>
>>> *Still, Pandavas won the war & final outcome was achieved**.*
>>>
>>> *So, what was different?* *It was their **managerial style** & **it was
>>> also the type of people who were being lead.*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *LORD RAMA** was leading an army of **‘MONKEYS’* *who were not skilled
>>> fighters & they were looking for direction.*
>>>
>>>    *While on other hand**, LORD KRISHNA* *was leading **ARJUNA* *who
>>> was one of the best archers of his time**. While Lord Ram’s role was to
>>> show it & lead from the front, **Krishna played the role of a coach
>>> whose job was to remove **cobwebs **from **his protégée’s mind. **Krishna
>>> couldn't teach Arjuna archery but he could definitely help him see things
>>> from a very different perspective.*
>>>
>>> *Here are some of the basic differences in two styles**:*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *LORD RAMA- A skilled warrior, lead monkeys, was emotional, gave precise
>>> roles & instructions, and motivated the army to fight for his cause*
>>>
>>> *LORD KRISHNA**- works with **best the professionals**, **provides
>>> strategic clarity**, **allows team members to take lead, fights for the
>>> cause of the team, **and did not depict his true emotions**.*
>>>
>>> *Look at your team/family & reflect what type of leader/parent you
>>> are!!!!!!!!*
>>>
>>> *One who keeps answering/solving problems for people/kids? *
>>>
>>> *Or*
>>>
>>> *Who asks relevant questions from their people/kids so that they can
>>> find their own solution?*
>>>
>>> *Are u someone who tells/directs all the time? *
>>>
>>> *Or*
>>>
>>> *Someone who clarifies doubts & allows their people/kids to find their
>>> own ways.*
>>>
>>> *Are u someone who has monkeys in the team & the way u deal with it Or u
>>> have the brightest experts in their area getting stuck with issues?*
>>>
>>>               *Younger generation* *doesn't want you to tell or show
>>> how things are to be done, **they want to know the meaning of their
>>> task and how it makes a difference in this world.*
>>>
>>> *They are **Arjuna**s……** who don’t necessarily seek more
>>> skill/knowledge but **they need someone to clarify the **cobwebs **in
>>> their mind**, if u still apply Lord Ram’s style on them, u are **bound
>>> to fail as a manager.*
>>>
>>>                              *On the other hand if there are people **who
>>> aren't skilled enough** but **rely on your expertise to sail u through* 
>>> *Lord
>>> Ram’s style is appropriate.*
>>>
>>>             *Isn’t it **GOOD** for us to reflect & think what
>>> managerial style will bring the best result for us and our team/family?*
>>>
>>> *Is it Lord Ram or Lord Krishna?*
>>>
>>> *Managing Leader vs the Coaching Leader!*
>>>
>>> *​*
>>>
>>> *COURTESY: Mathangi k kumar <[email protected]
>>> <[email protected]>>*
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> V.Sridharan
>>>
>>> Trichy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "iyer123" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/416425990.1876601.1706676350883%40mail.yahoo.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/416425990.1876601.1706676350883%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> On Facebook, please join https://www.facebook.com/groups/keralaiyerstrust
>>
>> We are now on Telegram Mobile App also, please join
>>
>> Pattars/Kerala Iyers Discussions: https://t.me/PattarsGroup
>>
>> Kerala Iyers Trust Decisions only posts : https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrust
>>
>> Kerala Iyers Trust Group for Discussions:
>> https://t.me/KeralaIyersTrustGroup
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "KeralaIyers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopNPH%3D_yK2i8d1VpYL2BpcU9xUHci3qcLoAoP1A6%3DV%3D%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/keralaiyers/CAL5XZopNPH%3D_yK2i8d1VpYL2BpcU9xUHci3qcLoAoP1A6%3DV%3D%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNmo9UP1wPZsOfyKaZdM1R%2B6AaziYr1q3Y1axc6cL2o3g%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhNmo9UP1wPZsOfyKaZdM1R%2B6AaziYr1q3Y1axc6cL2o3g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorzDNM__w%2BuLD4Xxc_FU1BP3yeTQh24rDJPiyioemb9SQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to