Gopala started the henpecked vomiting as usual. Gopala never understands
any language , leave alone Tamil. When Gopala and thesin bastard writes in
malayalam, it becomes a deva bhasha but when I do it is intemperate. And
always as his knowledge is blind, he thinks when N and L writes it is
Yajurvedam and when I write it is abuse. When I write about the rights to
address, he turns the other side, as he knows it is a right question and he
is an intruder. But he will accuse only others of myself of not doing this
and that; but a man of stupidity only will skip over what is truth and spin
over to get sympathy; those political dramas are all over; the more they
brat, the better they expose themselves. Gopalakrishnaan has no right to
call Valmiki as Shudra at all; who gave him the right? He is a shudra who
stopped at Gaya and ended the srardham; and when advised, he felt so guilty
, he addressed the so-called Guru once as "who said he is aguru etc"
nonsensical words. Shudra shall not call a brahmin as once shudra, once
judge , once IRS , once.....,but his chamcha is always an endless perennial
gutter. Gopalakrishnan You and all must check facts and put it in proper
manner; you said Valmiki himself is a shudra; your cockpit Tiruvalluvan and
Vyasa are shudras; and what are you Gopalkrishnan?; a brahmin?; still
thinking that way with all the inimical weaknesses in you? Your request to
the shudras  your commune looks like this: Cho in md bin tughlaq will say<"
avargalai vittu vidungal; kallal adikaadeergal" etc;( Leave them alone; do
not pelt stones) ; and when In Bhatinda questions that , Tuklaq will reply:
"The more we say negatively, people will pelt more stones and that is
politics.  Without reading completely even the western oriented, leave
alone Mahabharatham and Valmiki Ramayanam why even a stotram, you shall not
write nonsense. You want to focus before others as if you are a great
wisdom child and present yourself, so pitiable. Still you want to persist.
Valmiki is a Brahmin Munivar Rishi sage; and you are a shudra; Varna is by
what you do. KR  IRS  1224//2224

On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 20:49, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sirs,
>
> I  made a response about aadikavi Valmiki. He was born as Sudra. Mr
> Rajaram simply copy pasted  pages about Valmiki in which* no where it
> was  told Valmiki was not a Sudra.*
>
> It is not known why so much of responses which carry no sense and full of
> abusing by all.
>
> I request Mr Narayanswamy and Mr Sarma, to stop further responding to Mr
> Rajaram. It is because by his nature *Mr Rajaram will not stop his
> abusing* and will not prove the other way.
>
> *Mr Narayanaswamy and Mr Sarma sirs,*
>
>  Both of you can never go the level of Mr Rajaram in *Tamil abusing.* *Both
> of you will be defeated,* by further responses from Mr Rajaram,* from the
> stocked Tamil abusing till not wrote by him and kept reserved as
> Pasupathartha.*
>
>
> *Gopalakrishnan*
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqcADxDJktEs%2BQnhPUrOYPuSUdE6m9XNAKaQVXNBCf3YQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to