Yes as relabelled Narayanasamy and Gopalakrishnan as shudra Quite OK KR On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 22:35, Narayanaswamy Iyer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear folks > > Inveterate incurable advanced insanity madman Rajaram Krishnamurthy alias > KARUPPAN-CHAAMI alias KR ex-IRS, suffering from incurable dysentery, in > addition to syphilis inherited at birth from his para-sthree progenitress, > seeks unattainable relief by attacking Sri Gopalakrishnan, verifying the > attacker's identification as the first avathaaram in my list of > dasa-avathaarams. > > He is totally incapable of showing any one of the several qualities which > our vedams and our bhagavath-geetha say identify a braahmana. > > The ill-born, ill-brought-up, ill-mannered, mentally-ill, undisciplined, > unschooled, uneducated *BRAT* writes in his usual drain-gutter-sewer > ungrammatical broken English:- > > "*The **more they brat, the better they expose themselves. > Gopalakrishnaan has no right to call Valmiki as Shudra at all.*" > > The incontrovertible truth is that the more Rajaram Krishnamurthy ex-IRS > *brags* about his knowledge of our vedams, our shaasthrams, our religious > practices, our bhagavath-geetha, the better is he exposed, his abysmal > ignorance exposed, hi lies exposed, and he is named and shamed. > > Did not madman KR ex-IRS himself earlier write that Vaalmeeki was a dacoit > and murderer? Were not those the acts of a dalit and a chandaala? By > writing:- > > "*Valmiki is a Brahmin Munivar Rishi sage; and you are a shudra; Varna is > by what you do. KR IRS 1224//2224,"* > > is not perpetual villain KR ex-IRS committing three asathyams -- Vaalmeeki > is in fact a nothing more than a renamed/relabelled dacoit and murderer of > innocents; Sri Gopalakrishnan is a born, bred and practising braahmana; > and KR ex-IRS 1224//2224 is by action and by choice a dalit? > > S Narayanaswamy Iyer > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 11:15 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Gopala started the henpecked vomiting as usual. Gopala never understands >> any language , leave alone Tamil. When Gopala and thesin bastard writes in >> malayalam, it becomes a deva bhasha but when I do it is intemperate. And >> always as his knowledge is blind, he thinks when N and L writes it is >> Yajurvedam and when I write it is abuse. When I write about the rights to >> address, he turns the other side, as he knows it is a right question and he >> is an intruder. But he will accuse only others of myself of not doing this >> and that; but a man of stupidity only will skip over what is truth and spin >> over to get sympathy; those political dramas are all over; the more they >> brat, the better they expose themselves. Gopalakrishnaan has no right to >> call Valmiki as Shudra at all; who gave him the right? He is a shudra who >> stopped at Gaya and ended the srardham; and when advised, he felt so guilty >> , he addressed the so-called Guru once as "who said he is aguru etc" >> nonsensical words. Shudra shall not call a brahmin as once shudra, once >> judge , once IRS , once.....,but his chamcha is always an endless perennial >> gutter. Gopalakrishnan You and all must check facts and put it in proper >> manner; you said Valmiki himself is a shudra; your cockpit Tiruvalluvan and >> Vyasa are shudras; and what are you Gopalkrishnan?; a brahmin?; still >> thinking that way with all the inimical weaknesses in you? Your request to >> the shudras your commune looks like this: Cho in md bin tughlaq will say<" >> avargalai vittu vidungal; kallal adikaadeergal" etc;( Leave them alone; do >> not pelt stones) ; and when In Bhatinda questions that , Tuklaq will reply: >> "The more we say negatively, people will pelt more stones and that is >> politics. Without reading completely even the western oriented, leave >> alone Mahabharatham and Valmiki Ramayanam why even a stotram, you shall not >> write nonsense. You want to focus before others as if you are a great >> wisdom child and present yourself, so pitiable. Still you want to persist. >> Valmiki is a Brahmin Munivar Rishi sage; and you are a shudra; Varna is by >> what you do. KR IRS 1224//2224 >> >> On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 20:49, gopala krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sirs, >>> >>> I made a response about aadikavi Valmiki. He was born as Sudra. Mr >>> Rajaram simply copy pasted pages about Valmiki in which* no where it >>> was told Valmiki was not a Sudra.* >>> >>> It is not known why so much of responses which carry no sense and full >>> of abusing by all. >>> >>> I request Mr Narayanswamy and Mr Sarma, to stop further responding to Mr >>> Rajaram. It is because by his nature *Mr Rajaram will not stop his >>> abusing* and will not prove the other way. >>> >>> *Mr Narayanaswamy and Mr Sarma sirs,* >>> >>> Both of you can never go the level of Mr Rajaram in *Tamil abusing.* *Both >>> of you will be defeated,* by further responses from Mr Rajaram,* from >>> the stocked Tamil abusing till not wrote by him and kept reserved as >>> Pasupathartha.* >>> >>> >>> *Gopalakrishnan* >>> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "iyer123" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhOGwNHAa1REwYN87JpHDeSPY6fYic8y73djGZHSP-ORwA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CAL4idhOGwNHAa1REwYN87JpHDeSPY6fYic8y73djGZHSP-ORwA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqrYUmNRXwL%2Bf5Wwu_E45FNgpRU3BAZG85ieqdz0aYjqw%40mail.gmail.com.
